Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association of Polygenic Risk Score with Age at Onset and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease in a Chinese Cohort

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neuroscience Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate whether the polygenic profile modifies the development of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (sAD) and pathological biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 462 sAD patients and 463 age-matched cognitively normal (CN) controls were genotyped for 35 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are significantly associated with sAD. Then, the alleles found to be associated with sAD were used to build polygenic risk score (PRS) models to represent the genetic risk. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the predictive value of PRS for the sAD risk and age at onset. We measured the CSF levels of Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40, total tau (T-tau), and phosphorylated tau (P-tau) in a subgroup (60 sAD and 200 CN participants), and analyzed their relationships with the PRSs. We found that 14 SNPs, including SNPs in the APOE, BIN1, CD33, EPHA1, SORL1, and TOMM40 genes, were associated with sAD risk in our cohort. The PRS models built with these SNPs showed potential for discriminating sAD patients from CN controls, and were able to predict the incidence rate of sAD and age at onset. Furthermore, the PRSs were correlated with the CSF levels of Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40, T-tau, and P-tau. Our study suggests that PRS models hold promise for assessing the genetic risk and development of AD. As genetic risk profiles vary among populations, large-scale genome-wide sequencing studies are urgently needed to identify the genetic risk loci of sAD in Chinese populations to build accurate PRS models for clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gatz M, Reynolds CA, Fratiglioni L, Johansson B, Mortimer JA, Berg S, et al. Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006, 63: 168–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel D, George-Hyslop PH, Pericak-Vance MA, Joo SH, et al. Association of apolipoprotein E allele epsilon 4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1993, 43: 1467–1472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lambert JC, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 2013, 45: 1452–1458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hollingworth P, Harold D, Sims R, Gerrish A, Lambert JC, Carrasquillo MM, et al. Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 2011, 43: 429–435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harold D, Abraham R, Hollingworth P, Sims R, Gerrish A, Hamshere ML, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 2009, 41: 1088–1093.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Naj AC, Jun G, Beecham GW, Wang LS, Vardarajan BN, Buros J, et al. Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 2011, 43: 436–441.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lambert JC, Heath S, Even G, Campion D, Sleegers K, Hiltunen M, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 2009, 41: 1094–1099.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chouraki V, Seshadri S. Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Adv Genet 2014, 87: 245–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyashita A, Koike A, Jun G, Wang LS, Takahashi S, Matsubara E, et al. SORL1 is genetically associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in Japanese, Koreans and Caucasians. PLoS One 2013, 8: e58618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lacour A, Espinosa A, Louwersheimer E, Heilmann S, Hernandez I, Wolfsgruber S, et al. Genome-wide significant risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease: role in progression to dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease among subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Mol Psychiatry 2017, 22: 153–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jansen IE, Savage JE, Watanabe K, Bryois J, Williams DM, Steinberg S, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat Genet 2019, 51: 404–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun BL, Li WW, Zhu C, Jin WS, Zeng F, Liu YH, et al. Clinical research on Alzheimer’s disease: progress and perspectives. Neurosci Bull 2018, 34: 1111–1118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stocker H, Mollers T, Perna L, Brenner H. The genetic risk of Alzheimer’s disease beyond APOE epsilon4: systematic review of Alzheimer’s genetic risk scores. Transl Psychiatry 2018, 8: 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karch CM, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Biol Psychiatry 2015, 77: 43–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Desikan RS, Fan CC, Wang Y, Schork AJ, Cabral HJ, Cupples LA, et al. Genetic assessment of age-associated Alzheimer disease risk: Development and validation of a polygenic hazard score. PLoS Med 2017, 14: e1002258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sleegers K, Bettens K, De Roeck A, Van Cauwenberghe C, Cuyvers E, Verheijen J, et al. A 22-single nucleotide polymorphism Alzheimer’s disease risk score correlates with family history, onset age, and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42. Alzheimers Dement 2015, 11: 1452–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jack CR, Jr., Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018, 14: 535–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li WW, Shen YY, Tian DY, Bu XL, Zeng F, Liu YH, et al. Brain amyloid-beta deposition and blood biomarkers in patients with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2019, 69: 169–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bu XL, Yao XQ, Jiao SS, Zeng F, Liu YH, Xiang Y, et al. A study on the association between infectious burden and Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2015, 22: 1519–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984, 34: 939–944.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975, 12: 189–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005, 53: 695–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cuyvers E, Sleegers K. Genetic variations underlying Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from genome-wide association studies and beyond. Lancet Neurol 2016, 15: 857–868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lambert JC, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Genetics 2013, 45: 1452–1458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang S, Li X, Ma G, Jiang Y, Liao M, Feng R, et al. CLU rs9331888 polymorphism contributes to Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility in Caucasian but not East Asian populations. Mol Neurobiol 2016, 53: 1446–1451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu JT, Li L, Zhu QX, Zhang Q, Zhang W, Wu ZC, et al. Implication of CLU gene polymorphisms in Chinese patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Chim Acta 2010, 411: 1516–1519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiao Q, Liu ZJ, Tao S, Sun YM, Jiang D, Li HL, et al. Risk prediction for sporadic Alzheimer’s disease using genetic risk score in the Han Chinese population. Oncotarget 2015, 6: 36955–36964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Y, Yu JT, Wang HF, Hao XK, Yang YF, Jiang T, et al. Association between NME8 locus polymorphism and cognitive decline, cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 2014, 9: e114777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu H, Zhu XC, Wang HF, Cao L, Tan MS, Tan CC, et al. Lack of Association between SLC24A4 polymorphism and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in Han Chinese. Curr Neurovasc Res 2016, 13: 239–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zeng F, Shen C, Liu YH, Li J, Zhu J, Wang YR, et al. Genetic association between APP, ADAM10 gene polymorphism, and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease in the Chinese population. Neurotox Res 2015, 27: 284–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Blennow K, Hampel H, Weiner M, Zetterberg H. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2010, 6: 131–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Persson S, Arai H, Batish SD, Bernardini S, et al. The Alzheimer’s Association external quality control program for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement 2011, 7: 386–395 e386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yuan L, Song Z, Deng X, Yang Z, Yang Y, Guo Y, et al. Genetic analysis of FBXO2, FBXO6, FBXO12, and FBXO41 variants in Han Chinese patients with sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Bull 2017, 33: 510–514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Farrer LA, Cupples LA, Haines JL, Hyman B, Kukull WA, Mayeux R, et al. Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium. JAMA 1997, 278: 1349–1356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang Q, Chen K, Zhang H, Zhang W, Gong C, Zhang Q, et al. Correlations between single nucleotide polymorphisms, cognitive dysfunction, and postmortem brain pathology in Alzheimer’s disease among Han Chinese. Neurosci Bull 2019, 35: 193–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mormino EC, Papp KV, Rentz DM, Schultz AP, LaPoint M, Amariglio R, et al. Heterogeneity in suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology among clinically normal older individuals. JAMA Neurol 2016, 73: 1185–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Scheltens P, Blennow K, Breteler MM, de Strooper B, Frisoni GB, Salloway S, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2016, 388: 505–517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients and their families for their participation and dedication to research. This work was supported by the National Basic Research Development Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFC1306401) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91749206).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li-Yong Chen or Yan-Jiang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 124 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, WW., Wang, Z., Fan, DY. et al. Association of Polygenic Risk Score with Age at Onset and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease in a Chinese Cohort. Neurosci. Bull. 36, 696–704 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-020-00469-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-020-00469-8

Keywords

Navigation