Advertisement

Topological Shape Changes Weaken the Innate Defensive Response to Visual Threat in Mice

  • Yan HuangEmail author
  • Lei Li
  • Kun Dong
  • Hongsi Tang
  • Qingning Yang
  • Xianglian Jia
  • Yundan Liao
  • Wenbo Wang
  • Zhen Ren
  • Lin Chen
  • Liping WangEmail author
Letter to the Editor
  • 57 Downloads

Dear Editor,

Understanding the primitives of visual perception is a fundamental question in the study of vision. To address this question, a theory of topology-based functional hierarchy in visual perception has been proposed [1, 2]. This theory suggests that the extraction of topological properties (TPs) serves as the starting point of object perception. The TP of a figure is the holistic identity which remains constant across various smooth shape-changing transformations of an image [2]. For example, the shape of a rubber sheet can be changed through bending and twisting without changing its TP as long as the sheet does not tear. The number of holes in a geometrical object is a TP because it is retained during such rubber-sheet deformations. Thus the TP of an object is thought to be a basic attribute that is crucial for the stability of perception from variable visual input and is processed with priority during visual perception [2]. The “early topological perception” hypothesis was...

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Funding Program, China (JCYJ20170818161400180 and JCYJ20180508152336419), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81425010, 31630031, and 31971072), and the Key Laboratory of Brain Connectome of Guangdong Province, China (2017B030301017).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary material

12264_2019_454_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (61 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 61 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Chen L. Topological structure in visual perception. Science 1982, 218: 699–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen L. The topological approach to perceptual organization. Vis Cogn 2005, 12: 553–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang Y, Zhou T, Chen L. The precedence of topological change over top-down attention in masked priming. J Vis 2011, 11: 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang Y, He L, Wang W, Meng Q, Zhou T, Chen L. What determines the object-level visual masking: The bottom-up role of topological change. J Vis 2018, 18: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin YL, Chien SHL, Hu S. An early sensitivity for detecting differences in visual topological property in 0-to 4- day-old human neonates. Pediatric Dimensions 2016, 1: 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu J, Guo XY, Ma Y, Ren F. Different topological properties pattern recognition in mice. Prog Biochem Biophys 2010, 37: 613–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen L, Zhang S, Srinivasan MV. Global perception in small brains: Topological pattern recognition in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100: 6884–6889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou K, Luo H, Zhou T, Zhuo Y, Chen L. Topological change disturbs object continuity in attentive tracking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107: 21920–21924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhuo Y, Zhou TG, Rao HY, Wang JJ, Meng M, Chen M, et al. Contributions of the visual ventral pathway to long-range apparent motion. Science 2003, 299: 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    King SM, Dykeman C, Redgrave P, Dean P. Use of a distracting task to obtain defensive head movements to looming visual stimuli by human adults in a laboratory setting. Perception 1992, 21: 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wallace DJ, Greenberg DS, Sawinski J, Rulla S, Notaro G, Kerr JND. Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion. Nature 2013, 498: 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li L, Feng X, Zhou Z, Zhang H, Shi Q, Lei Z, et al. Stress accelerates defensive responses to looming in mice and involves a locus coeruleus-superior colliculus projection. Curr Biol 2018, 28: 859–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shang C, Liu Z, Chen Z, Shi Y, Wang Q, Liu S, et al. A parvalbumin-positive excitatory visual pathway to trigger fear responses in mice. Science 2015;, 348: 1472–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meng Q, Huang Y, Cui D, He L, Chen L, Ma Y, et al. The dissociations of visual processing of “hole” and “no‐hole” stimuli: An functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain Behav 2018, 8: e00979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Livingstone M, Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 1988, 240: 740–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duan J, Fu H, Zhang J. Activation of parvalbumin-positive neurons in both retina and primary visual cortex improves the feature-selectivity of primary visual cortex neurons. Neurosci Bull 2017, 33: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Erskine D, Taylor JP, Thomas A, Collerton D, McKeith I, Khundakar A, et al. Pathological changes to the subcortical visual system and its relationship to visual hallucinations in dementia with lewy bodies. Neurosci Bull 2019, 35: 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schiff W, Caviness JA, Gibson JJ. Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of “looming”. Science 1962, 136: 982–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    White BJ, Munoz DP. The Superior Colliculus. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Das P, Kemp AH, Flynn G, Harris AW, Liddell BJ, Whitford TJ, et al. Functional disconnections in the direct and indirect amygdala pathways for fear processing in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2007,90: 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, CAS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute (BCBDI), Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science-Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions, Guangdong Key Lab of Brain ConnectomicsShenzhenChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, CASUniversity of the CASBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations