Neuroscience Bulletin

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 436–444 | Cite as

Animal models of axon regeneration after spinal cord injury



With advances in genetic and imaging techniques, investigating axon regeneration after spinal cord injury in vivo is becoming more common in the literature. However, there are many issues to consider when using animal models of axon regeneration, including species, strains and injury models. No single particular model suits all types of experiments and each hypothesis being tested requires careful selection of the appropriate animal model. in this review, we describe several commonly-used animal models of axon regeneration in the spinal cord and discuss their advantages and disadvantages.


pyramidotomy strain differences contusion injury models 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Cafferty WB, McGee AW, Strittmatter SM. Axonal growth therapeutics: regeneration or sprouting or plasticity? Trends Neurosci 2008, 31: 215–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Steward O, Zheng B, Tessier-Lavigne M. False resurrections: distinguishing regenerated from spared axons in the injured central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 2003, 459: 1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Tuszynski MH, Steward O. Concepts and methods for the study of axonal regeneration in the CNS. Neuron 2012, 74: 777–791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Inman D, Guth L, Steward O. Genetic influences on secondary degeneration and wound healing following spinal cord injury in various strains of mice. J Comp Neurol 2002, 451: 225–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Basso DM, Fisher LC, Anderson AJ, Jakeman LB, McTigue DM, Popovich PG. Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains. J Neurotrauma 2006, 23: 635–659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kigerl KA, McGaughy VM, Popovich PG. Comparative analysis of lesion development and intraspinal inflammation in four strains of mice following spinal contusion injury. J Comp Neurol 2006, 494: 578–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ma M, Wei P, Wei T, Ransohoff RM, Jakeman LB. Enhanced axonal growth into a spinal cord contusion injury site in a strain of mouse (129X1/SvJ) with a diminished inflammatory response. J Comp Neurol 2004, 474: 469–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kostyk SK, Popovich PG, Stokes BT, Wei P, Jakeman LB. Robust axonal growth and a blunted macrophage response are associated with impaired functional recovery after spinal cord injury in the MRL/MpJ mouse. Neuroscience 2008, 156: 498–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dimou L, Schnell L, Montani L, Duncan C, Simonen M, Schneider R, et al. Nogo-A-deficient mice reveal straindependent differences in axonal regeneration. J Neurosci 2006, 26: 5591–5603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Doetschman T. Influence of genetic background on genetically engineered mouse phenotypes. Methods Mol Biol 2009, 530: 423–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Rossignol S, Frigon A. Recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury: some facts and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 2011, 34: 413–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Rossignol S, Bouyer L, Langlet C, Barthelemy D, Chau C, Giroux N, et al. Determinants of locomotor recovery after spinal injury in the cat. Prog Brain Res 2004, 143: 163–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Lee JH, Jones CF, Okon EB, Anderson L, Tigchelaar S, Kooner P, et al. A novel porcine model of traumatic thoracic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2013, 30: 142–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kuluz J, Samdani A, Benglis D, Gonzalez-Brito M, Solano JP, Ramirez MA, et al. Pediatric spinal cord injury in infant piglets: description of a new large animal model and review of the literature. J Spinal Cord Med 2010, 33: 43–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Rosenzweig ES, Courtine G, Jindrich DL, Brock JH, Ferguson AR, Strand SC, et al. Extensive spontaneous plasticity of corticospinal projections after primate spinal cord injury. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13: 1505–1510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Bortoff GA, Strick PL. Corticospinal terminations in two newworld primates: further evidence that corticomotoneuronal connections provide part of the neural substrate for manual dexterity. J Neurosci 1993, 13: 5105–5118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Courtine G, Bunge MB, Fawcett JW, Grossman RG, Kaas JH, Lemon R, et al. Can experiments in nonhuman primates expedite the translation of treatments for spinal cord injury in humans? Nat Med 2007, 13: 561–566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Ethier C, Oby ER, Bauman MJ, Miller LE. Restoration of grasp following paralysis through brain-controlled stimulation of muscles. Nature 2012, 485: 368–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Zheng B, Lee JK, Xie F. Genetic mouse models for studying inhibitors of spinal axon regeneration. Trends Neurosci 2006, 29: 640–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Brosamle C, Schwab ME. Cells of origin, course, and termination patterns of the ventral, uncrossed component of the mature rat corticospinal tract. J Comp Neurol 1997, 386: 293–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Brosamle C, Schwab ME. Ipsilateral, ventral corticospinal tract of the adult rat: ultrastructure, myelination and synaptic connections. J Neurocytol 2000, 29: 499–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Steward O, Zheng B, Ho C, Anderson K, Tessier-Lavigne M. The dorsolateral corticospinal tract in mice: an alternative route for corticospinal input to caudal segments following dorsal column lesions. J Comp Neurol 2004, 472: 463–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Bareyre FM, Kerschensteiner M, Misgeld T, Sanes JR. Transgenic labeling of the corticospinal tract for monitoring axonal responses to spinal cord injury. Nat Med 2005, 11: 1355–1360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Neumann S, Woolf CJ. Regeneration of dorsal column fibers into and beyond the lesion site following adult spinal cord injury. Neuron 1999, 23: 83–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Hoffman PN. A conditioning lesion induces changes in gene expression and axonal transport that enhance regeneration by increasing the intrinsic growth state of axons. Exp Neurol 2010, 223: 11–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Cao Z, Gao Y, Bryson JB, Hou J, Chaudhry N, Siddiq M, et al. The cytokine interleukin-6 is sufficient but not necessary to mimic the peripheral conditioning lesion effect on axonal growth. J Neurosci 2006, 26: 5565–5573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Blesch A, Lu P, Tsukada S, Alto LT, Roet K, Coppola G, et al. Conditioning lesions before or after spinal cord injury recruit broad genetic mechanisms that sustain axonal regeneration: superiority to camp-mediated effects. Exp Neurol 2012, 235: 162–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Stam FJ, MacGillavry HD, Armstrong NJ, de Gunst MC, Zhang Y, van Kesteren RE, et al. Identification of candidate transcriptional modulators involved in successful regeneration after nerve injury. Eur J Neurosci 2007, 25: 3629–3637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Gruner JA. A monitored contusion model of spinal cord injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma 1992, 9: 123–126; discussion 126–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Wrathall JR, Pettegrew RK, Harvey F. Spinal cord contusion in the rat: production of graded, reproducible, injury groups. Exp Neurol 1985, 88: 108–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Stokes BT. Experimental spinal cord injury: a dynamic and verifiable injury device. J Neurotrauma 1992, 9: 129–131; discussion 131–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Jakeman LB, Guan Z, Wei P, Ponnappan R, Dzwonczyk R, Popovich PG, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury produced by controlled contusion in mouse. J Neurotrauma 2000, 17: 299–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Scheff SW, Rabchevsky AG, Fugaccia I, Main JA, Lumpp JE Jr. Experimental modeling of spinal cord injury: characterization of a force-defined injury device. J Neurotrauma 2003, 20: 179–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Nishi RA, Liu H, Chu Y, Hamamura M, Su MY, Nalcioglu O, et al. Behavioral, histological, and ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging assessment of graded contusion spinal cord injury in mice. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24: 674–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Noble LJ, Wrathall JR. Spinal cord contusion in the rat: morphometric analyses of alterations in the spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1985, 88: 135–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Li W, Cai WQ, Li CR. Repair of spinal cord injury by neural stem cells modified with BDNF gene in rats. Neurosci Bull 2006, 22: 34–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Barakat DJ, Gaglani SM, Neravetla SR, Sanchez AR, Andrade CM, Pressman Y, et al. Survival, integration, and axon growth support of glia transplanted into the chronically contused spinal cord. Cell Transplant 2005, 14: 225–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Pearse DD, Pereira FC, Marcillo AE, Bates ML, Berrocal YA, Filbin MT, et al. cAMP and Schwann cells promote axonal growth and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nat Med 2004, 10: 610–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Gao M, Lu P, Bednark B, Lynam D, Conner JM, Sakamoto J, et al. Templated agarose scaffolds for the support of motor axon regeneration into sites of complete spinal cord transection. Biomaterials 2013, 34: 1529–1536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Whishaw IQ, Pellis SM, Gorny B, Kolb B, Tetzlaff W. Proximal and distal impairments in rat forelimb use in reaching follow unilateral pyramidal tract lesions. Behav Brain Res 1993, 56: 59–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Starkey ML, Barritt AW, Yip PK, Davies M, Hamers FP, McMahon SB, et al. Assessing behavioural function following a pyramidotomy lesion of the corticospinal tract in adult mice. Expl Neurol 2005, 195: 524–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Lee JK, Geoffroy CG, Chan AF, Tolentino KE, Crawford MJ, Leal MA, et al. Assessing spinal axon regeneration and sprouting in Nogo-, MAG-, and OMgp-deficient mice. Neuron 2010, 66: 663–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Thallmair M, Metz GA, Z’Graggen WJ, Raineteau O, Kartje GL, Schwab ME. Neurite growth inhibitors restrict plasticity and functional recovery following corticospinal tract lesions. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1: 124–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Liu K, Lu Y, Lee JK, Samara R, Willenberg R, Sears-Kraxberger I, et al. PTEN deletion enhances the regenerative ability of adult corticospinal neurons. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13: 1075–1081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Cafferty WB, Strittmatter SM. The Nogo-Nogo receptor pathway limits a spectrum of adult CNS axonal growth. J Neurosci 2006, 26: 12242–12250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Leong SK, Ling EA, Fan DP. Glial reaction after pyramidotomy in mice and rats. Neurodegeneration 1995, 4: 403–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, et al. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 2000, 28: 41–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Kerschensteiner M, Schwab ME, Lichtman JW, Misgeld T. In vivo imaging of axonal degeneration and regeneration in the injured spinal cord. Nat Med 2005, 11: 572–577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Di Maio A, Skuba A, Himes BT, Bhagat SL, Hyun JK, Tessler A, et al. In vivo imaging of dorsal root regeneration: rapid immobilization and presynaptic differentiation at the CNS/PNS border. J Neurosci 2011, 31: 4569–4582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Han SB, Kim H, Skuba A, Tessler A, Ferguson T, Son YJ. Sensory Axon Regeneration: A Review from an in vivo imaging Perspective. Exp Neurobiol 2012, 21: 83–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Farrar MJ, Bernstein IM, Schlafer DH, Cleland TA, Fetcho JR, Schaffer CB. Chronic in vivo imaging in the mouse spinal cord using an implanted chamber. Nat Methods 2012, 9: 297–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Davalos D, Lee JK, Smith WB, Brinkman B, Ellisman MH, Zheng B, et al. Stable in vivo imaging of densely populated glia, axons and blood vessels in the mouse spinal cord using two-photon microscopy. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 169: 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Fenrich KK, Weber P, Hocine M, Zalc M, Rougon G, Debarbieux F. Long-term in vivo imaging of normal and pathological mouse spinal cord with subcellular resolution using implanted glass windows. J Physiol 2012, 590: 3665–3675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Davalos D, Akassoglou K. In vivo imaging of the mouse spinal cord using two-photon microscopy. J Vis Exp 2012: e2760.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Yanik MF, Cinar H, Cinar HN, Chisholm AD, Jin Y, Ben-Yakar A. Neurosurgery: functional regeneration after laser axotomy. Nature 2004, 432: 822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Chen L, Wang Z, Ghosh-Roy A, Hubert T, Yan D, O’Rourke S, et al. Axon regeneration pathways identified by systematic genetic screening in C. elegans. Neuron 2011, 71: 1043–1057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of Miami School of MedicineMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations