Genes & Nutrition

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 1–4 | Cite as

Foodomics: a new comprehensive approach to food and nutrition



In the past 20 years, the scientific community has faced a great development in different fields due to the development of high-throughput, omics technologies. Starting from the four major types of omics measurements (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics), a variety of omics subdisciplines (epigenomics, lipidomics, interactomics, metallomics, diseasomics, etc.) has emerged. Thanks to the omics approach, researchers are now facing the possibility of connecting food components, foods, the diet, the individual, the health, and the diseases, but this broad vision needs not only the application of advanced technologies, but mainly the ability of looking at the problem with a different approach, a “foodomics approach”. Foodomics is the comprehensive, high-throughput approach for the exploitation of food science in the light of an improvement of human nutrition. Foodomics is a new approach to food and nutrition that studies the food domain as a whole with the nutrition domain to reach the main objective, the optimization of human health and well-being.


Foodomics Omics technologies Food science Human nutrition 


  1. Bordoni A, Astolfi A, Morandi L, Pession A, Danesi F, Di Nunzio M, Franzoni M, Biagi P, Pession A (2007) N-3 PUFAs modulate global gene expression profile in cultured rat cardiomyocytes. Implications in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. FEBS Lett 581:923–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordoni A, Picone G, Babini E, Vignali M, Danesi F, Valli V, Di Nunzio M, Laghi L, Capozzi F (2011) NMR comparison of in vitro digestion of Parmigiano Reggiano cheese aged 15 and 30 months. Magn Reson Chem 49:S61–S70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerdà J, Manchado M (2012) Advances in genomics for flatfish aquaculture. Gene Nutr. doi:10.1007/s12263-012-0312-8
  4. Cifuentes A (2009) Food analysis and foodomics. J Chromatogr A 1216:7109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Alessandro A, Zolla L (2012) We are what we eat: food safety and proteomics. J Proteome Res 11:26–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. García-Cañas V, Simó C, León C, Ibáñez E, Cifuentes A (2011) MS-based analytical methodologies to characterize genetically modified crops. Mass Spectrom Rev 30:396–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. German JB, Zivkovic AM, Dallas DC, Smilowitz JT (2011) Nutrigenomics and personalized diets: what will they mean for food? Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2:97–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hong YS (2011) NMR-based metabolomics in wine science. Magn Reson Chem 49(Suppl 1):S13–S21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Montoliu I, Genick U, Ledda M, Collino S, Martin F-P, le Coutre J, Rezzi S (2012) Current status on genome-metabolome wide associations: an opportunity in nutrition research. Gene Nutr (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Morrell PL, Buckler ES, Ross-Ibarra J (2011) Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat Rev Genet 13:85–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Morrison N, Cochrane G, Faruque N, Tatusova T, Tateno Y, Hancock D, Field D (2006) Concept of sample in OMICS technology. OMICS 10:127–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pérez-Massot E, Banakar R, Gómez-Galera S, Zorrilla-López U, Sanahuja G, Arjó G, Miralpeix B, Vamvaka E, Farré G, Rivera SM, Dashevskaya S, Berman J, Sabalza M, Yuan D, Bai C, Bassie L, Twyman RM, Capell T, Christou P, Zhu C (2012) The contribution of transgenic plants to better health through improved nutrition: opportunities and constraints. Gene Nutr (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Picone G, Engelsen SB, Savorani F, Testi S, Badiani A, Capozzi F (2011a) Metabolomics as a powerful tool for molecular quality assessment of the fish Sparus aurata. Nutrients 3:212–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Picone G, Mezzetti B, Babini E, Capocasa F, Placucci G, Capozzi F (2011b) Unsupervised principal component analysis of NMR metabolic profiles for the assessment of substantial equivalence of transgenic grapes (Vitis vinifera). J Agric Food Chem 59:9271–9279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Puiggròs F, Solà R, Bladé C, Salvadó MJ, Arola L (2011) Nutritional biomarkers and foodomic methodologies for qualitative and quantitative analysis of bioactive ingredients in dietary intervention studies. J Chromatogr A 1218:7399–7414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rezzi S, Ramadan Z, Fay LB, Kochhar S (2007) Nutritional metabonomics: applications and perspectives. J Proteome Res 6:513–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Savorani F, Picone G, Badiani A, Fagioli P, Capozzi F, Engelsen SB (2010) Metabolic profiling and aquaculture differentiation of gilthead sea bream by H-1 NMR metabonomics. Food Chem 120:907–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shukla Y, George J (2011) Combinatorial strategies employing nutraceuticals for cancer development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1229:162–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Soni KA, Nannapaneni R, Tasara T (2011) The contribution of transcriptomic and proteomic analysis in elucidating stress adaptation responses of Listeria monocytogenes. Foodborne Pathog Dis 8:843–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Valdés A, García-Cañas V, Rocamora-Reverte L, Gómez-Martínez A, Ferragut JA, Cifuentes A (2012) Effect of rosemary polyphenols on human colon cancer cells: transcriptomic profiling and functional enrichment analysis. Gene Nutr (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food SciencesUniversity of BolognaCesenaItaly

Personalised recommendations