Skip to main content
Log in

A Chink in the Armour? — “Good Surgical Practice” Audit of Operative Notes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A thorough and accurate operative note is an essential part of a good surgeon’s armamentarium. It serves as a crucial guide for postoperative patient care and has medico-legal ramifications. To assess the quality and completeness of operative notes in comparison with Royal College of England (RCSEng) guidelines, we, in a tertiary care hospital, conducted a closed-loop audit analysis of 100 random operative notes, for completeness and accuracy. The major deficiencies were details of operative findings, estimated blood loss, identification of prosthesis, and mention of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. After highlighting these lacunae, we educated surgeons and surgical trainees on the “Good Surgical Practice” recommendations by RCSEng. After the implementation of a new proforma for operative notes, a reaudit was done of 100 random operative notes after 3 months, to check for compliance. The overall quality of operative notes improved particularly with respect to date and time of surgery, operative findings, estimated blood loss, identification of prosthesis, and mention of thromboembolism prophylaxis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nyamulani N, Mulwafu W (2018) The quality of hand-written operative notes in a surgical unit at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Malawi: A prospective completed audit loop study. Malawi Med J 30(2):86. https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v30i2.6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rogers A, Bunting M, Atherstone A (2008) The quality of operative notes at a general surgery unit. S Afr Med J 98:726–728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamza AA, Abdalrahim HM, Idris SA, Ahmed OM (2013) Evaluating the operative notes of patients undergoing surgery at Omdurman teaching hospital, Sudan. Sch J App Med Sci 1(6):668–672

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coughlan F, Ellanti P, Fhoghlu CN, Moriarity A, Hogan N (2015) Audit of Orthopaedic Surgical Documentation. Surg Res Pract:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/782720

  5. Good Surg Pract 2014. Royal College of Surgeons (England) Available from: http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/docs/good-surgical-practice

  6. Lefter LP, Walker SR, Dewhurst F, Turner RWL (2008) An audit of operative notes: facts and ways to improve. ANZ J Surg 78(9):800–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malik SS, Nogaro MC, Shenoy R, Mitchell PD (2013) Improving trauma operation notes at an emerging trauma unit in the regional trauma network. R Coll Surg Engl 95(6):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588413x13643054410386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. General Medical Council (2013) Good medical practice. GMC, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campling E, Devlin H, Hoile R, Lunn J (1993) The report of the National Confidential Enquiry into perioperative deaths 1991/92. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. How to write an operation note? - Dr.Maheswaran Pitchaimuthu – Learning General Surgery. Available at : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOQSFNq4pzA&t=173

  11. Surgical Audit - Short Practice of Surgery - Bailey and Love, 27th Edition; 161-169

  12. Payne K, Jones K, Dickenson A (2011) Improving the Standard of Operative Notes within an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, using an Operative Note Proforma. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10(3):203–208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bateman ND, Carney AS, Gibbin KP (1999) An audit of the quality of notes in an otolaryngology unit. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44:94–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Din R, Jenna D, Muddu BN (2001) The use of an aide-memoire to improve the quality of operation notes in an orthopedic unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83:319–320

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Huda F, Kumar N, Verma S (2019) Assessing the Quality of Operation Notes in a Teaching Hospital. Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(1):000150

    Google Scholar 

  16. Javid M, Swaminathan SP, Jebasingh AV, Velayutham M, Mani R (2020) A prospective closed loop audit on the quality of the operative notes in a general surgical unit in a quaternary care centre. Int Surg J 7:382–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hussainy HA, Ali F, Jones S, McGregor-Riley JC, Sukumar S (2004) Improving the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: the value of a proforma. Injury 35(11):1102–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bateman ND, Carney AS, Gibbin KP (1999) An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44(2):94–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shayah A, Agada FO, Gunasekaran S, Jassar P (2007) The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard. Int J Clin Pract 61(4):677–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Bichere A, Sellu D (1997) The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79(5 Suppl):204–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lakshmikantha N, Lakshman K (2020) A review of Operation Theater notes in a tertiary care center. Indian J Surg 83(4):956–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02567-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Borchert D, Rarshen H, Kemps M, Lavelle M (2006) Operative notes teaching: re-discovery of an effective teaching tool in surgicaltraining. Int J Surg 8(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. GIRFT, RCS and ASGBI Best practice for Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Documentation. Available at: https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/GIRFT-best-practice-lap-appendicectomy-Final-20220830.pdf

  24. Abbas SH, Singh S, Sundran R, Akbari K, Gilmour J, Puttick M (2016) A thorough note: Does a procedure-specific operation note proforma for laparoscopic appendicectomy improve compliance with the Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines. Int J Surg Open 2:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2016.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meenakshi Mission Hospital And ... vs Samuraj And Anr. on 12 August, 2004 Available at: http://indiankanoon.org/doc/967273/

  26. Hospital leaves surgical mop in abdomen, Bengaluru woman wins Rs 20 lakh relief Available at: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/hospital-leaves-surgical-mop-in-abdomen-bengaluru-woman-wins-rs-20-lakh-relief/articleshow/95812622.cms

  27. Ghani Y, Thakrar R, Kosuge D, Bates P (2010) ‘Smart’ electronic operation notes in surgery: an innovative way to improve patient care. Int J Surg 12(5):30–32

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barritt AW, Clark L, Cohen AM, Hosangadi-Jayedev N, Gibb PA (2010) Improving the quality of procedure-specific operation reports in orthopaedic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92(2):159–162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Oladeji EO, Singh S, Kastos K (2022) Improving Compliance With Operative Note Guidelines Through the Implementation of an Electronic Proforma. Cureus 14(12):e32222. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Risha Shetty.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

M.N, L., Shetty, R., Kulkarni, S. et al. A Chink in the Armour? — “Good Surgical Practice” Audit of Operative Notes. Indian J Surg 86, 374–379 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03878-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03878-x

Keywords

Navigation