Abstract
Manual massage is frequently recommended in the post-operative period after plastic surgery. However, in the literature, studies on manual massage have mostly been conducted within the scope of sports medicine, whereas the number of studies related to plastic surgery is limited. In this study, a questionnaire was applied to reveal plastic surgeons’ views of manual massage. A 14-item electronic questionnaire was administered to plastic surgeons in Turkey. Questions on frequently performed surgeries, reasons for recommending massage, level of knowledge about massage maneuvers, and other details were asked. The collected data were analyzed. A sample of 115 plastic surgeons responded. Eighty-eight percent thought that manual massage after plastic surgery worked effectively, and 93% recommended massage. The most common reason for recommending massage was “to speed up recovery from edema.” Eighteen percent could refer patients to a professional massage practitioner, but 41% thought that there were not enough studies in the plastic surgery literature on the post-operative use of manual massage. Sixty-three percent thought there should be sessions in scientific meetings, publications in journals, or other continuing medical education tools on manual massage in plastic surgery. This study revealed that manual massage is frequently used in plastic surgery and surgeons think that it works well. Level of Evidence V
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goats GC (1994) Massage--the scientific basis of an ancient art: Part 1. The techniques Br J Sports Med 28(3):149–152. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.28.3.149
Cafarelli E, Flint F (1992) The role of massage in preparation for and recovery from exercise: an overview. Sports Med 14(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199214010-00001
Holey LA, Dixon J (2014) Connective tissue manipulation: a review of theory and clinical evidence. J Bodyw Mov Ther 18(1):112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.08.003
Ezzo J, Manheimer E, McNeely ML et al (2015) Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. In: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published online May 21. Cochrane Breast Cancer Group. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2
Knygsand-Roenhoej K, Maribo T (2011) A randomized clinical controlled study comparing the effect of modified manual edema mobilization treatment with traditional edema technique in patients with a fracture of the distal radius. J Hand Ther 24(3):184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2010.10.009
Weerapong P, Hume PA, Kolt GS (2005) The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Sports Med 35(3):235–256. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200535030-00004
Becker H, Prysi MF (1990) Quantitative assessment of postoperative breast massage. Plast Reconstr Surg 86(2):355–356. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199008000-00030
Sood A, Xue EY, Sangiovanni C, Therattil PJ, Lee ES (2017) Breast massage, implant displacement, and prevention of capsular contracture after breast augmentation with implants: a review of the literature. Eplasty 17:e41
Boey GE, Wasilenchuk JL (2014) Enhanced clinical outcome with manual massage following cryolipolysis treatment: a 4-month study of safety and efficacy. Lasers Surg Med 46(1):20–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22209
Anthonissen M, Daly D, Janssens T, Van den Kerckhove E (2016) The effects of conservative treatments on burn scars: a systematic review. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj 42(3):508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.12.006
Shin TM, Bordeaux JS (2012) The role of massage in scar management: a literature review. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al 38(3):414–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02201.x
Zhang Q, Sun Z, Yue J (2015) Massage therapy for preventing pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 6:CD010518. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010518.pub2
Nunes ND, de Matos MO, Rocha-Lima ABC, Soares VCG, Farcic TS (2020) Therapeutic approaches used as a tool for functional and aesthetic restoration in plastic surgery post-operative phase: a literature review. Revista eletrônica em Gestão e Tecnologia 6(1)
Karafa M, Karafová A, Szuba A (2020) A compression device versus compression stockings in long-term therapy of lower limb primary lymphoedema after liposuction. J Wound Care 29(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2020.29.1.28
Field T, Diego M, Hernandez-Reif M (2007) Massage therapy research. Dev Rev 27(1):75–89
Field T (2002) Massage therapy. Med Clin 86(1):163–171
Field T (2016) Massage therapy research review. Complement Ther Clin Pract 24:19–31
Gasibat Q, Suwehli W (2017) Determining the benefits of massage mechanisms: a review of literature. Rehabil Sci 3(2):58–67
Kukimoto Y, Ooe N, Ideguchi N (2017) The effects of massage therapy on pain and anxiety after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Manage Nurs 18(6):378–390
Atchison JW, Tolchin RB, Ross BS, Eubanks JE (2021) Manipulation, traction, and massage. In: Braddom’s physical medicine and rehabilitation. Elsevier, pp 316–337 e7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Ethics committee approval is not required for this type of study.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent is not required for this type of study.
Conflict of İnterest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix. 14-item questionnaire
Appendix. 14-item questionnaire
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Erdal, A.I. Manual Massage in Plastic Surgery: Current Practices and Surgeons’ Perspectives. Indian J Surg 85, 1159–1169 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03701-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03701-7