Skip to main content
Log in

Informed Consent Form for Surgery in India — Changing Scenario

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Obtaining an Informed consent before any surgical procedure has been in vogue since 1957. With the increasing rates of litigation against doctors, it has been found that not having obtained an explicit and adequate informed consent is the main reason for cases to be filed against surgeons. The electronic era has made significant upgrades on the way consent can be obtained through video- counselling, eConsents etc. There are certain loopholes seen in obtaining consents in high volume surgical centres where untrained residents get the consents and in old and frail patients not able to give effective consents. With the law stating that each consent should be customised for the patient, without use of general pre-printed forms, it is all the more important to understand clearly all that an Informed consent taken in today’s practice should contain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salgo v Leland Stanford, Jr University Board of Trustees. 154 Cal App 2d 560, 317 P2d 170 (1957). Accessed February 5, 2021. caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1759823.html

  2. Canadian Medical Protective Association. Risk Fact Sheet CMPA. Available: www.cmpa-acpm.ca/documents/10179/300031190 /informed_consent-e.pdf (accessed 2016 Mar. 1).

  3. Kumar S, Mohanraj R, Rose A, Paul MJ, Thomas G. How 'informed' is informed consent? Findings from a study in South India. Indian J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul-Sep;9(3):180–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2012.061.

  4. Mathiharan K (2014) Law on consent and confidentiality in India: a need for clarity. Natl Med J India. 27(1):39–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Owen D, Aresti N, Mulligan A, Kosuge D (2018) Customizable pre-printed consent forms: a solution in light of the Montgomery ruling. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 79(2):97–101. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2018.79.2.97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wood F, Martin SM, Carson-Stevens A, Elwyn G, Precious E, Kinnersley P (2016) Doctors’ perspectives of informed consent for non-emergency surgical procedures: a qualitative interview study. Health Expect 19(3):751–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12258 (Epub 2014 Sep 12)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heaney RM, Murray M, Heaney AM, Doherty EM (2019) “All by myself”: interns’ reports of their experiences taking consent in Irish hospitals. Ir J Med Sci 188(1):259–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1782-5 (Epub 2018 Mar 9)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garonzik-Wang JM, Brat G, Salazar JH et al (2013) Missing consent forms in the preoperative area: a single-center assessment of the scope of the problem and its downstream effects. JAMA Surg 148(9):886–889. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh AD, Rochwani R, Oberoi S (2021) Informed consent and responses of surgical patients: a study in North India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 11(8):925–929. https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2021.11.06217202109072021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rateesh S, Akanksha D (2019) Informed consent in medical decision making in India. J Couns Family Ther 1:30–37

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miao Y, Venning VL, Mallitt KA, Rhodes JEJ, Isserman NJ, Moreno G, Lee S, Ryman W, Fischer G, Saunderson RB (2020) A randomized controlled trial comparing video-assisted informed consent with standard consent for Mohs micrographic surgery. JAAD Int 1(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2020.03.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrarese A, Pozzi G, Borghi F, Pellegrino L, Di Lorenzo P, Amato B, Santangelo M, Niola M, Martino V, Capasso E (2016) Informed consent in robotic surgery: quality of information and patient perception. Open Med (Wars) 11(1):279–285. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. SenthilKumaran S, David SS, Menezes RG (2014) Thirumalaikolundusubramanian P. Concern counseling and consent for bariatric surgery Indian J Nephrol. 24(4):263–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.133045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reeves JJ, Mekeel KL, Waterman RS et al (2020) Association of electronic surgical consent forms with entry error rates. JAMA Surg 155(8):777–778. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bosk C (1979) Forgive and remember: managing medical failure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patial T, Thakur V, VijhayGanesun N, Sharma M (2017) Gossypibomas in India a systematic literature review. J Postgrad Med. 63(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.198153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dahlberg J, Dahl V, Forde R et al (2019) Lack of informed consent for surgical procedures by elderly patients with inability to consent: a retrospective chart review from an academic medical center in Norway. Patient Saf Surg 13:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0205-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Agozzino E, Borrelli S, Cancellieri M et al (2019) Does written informed consent adequately inform surgical patients? A cross sectional study. BMC Med Ethics 20:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0340-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rangaramanujam A (2008) Liberalizing consent - Supreme Court’s preference for “real consent” over “informed consent.” Indian J Radiol Imaging 18(3):195–197

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar A, Mullick P, Prakash S, Bharadwaj A (2015) Consent and the Indian medical practitioner. Indian J Anaesth 59(11):695–700. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.169989

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar B, Ali M, Kumar M et al (2021) Consent in surgical practice. Indian J Surg 83:1345–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02698-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaushik Bhattacharya.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharya, K., Bhattacharya, N. Informed Consent Form for Surgery in India — Changing Scenario. Indian J Surg 85, 485–488 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03508-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03508-y

Keywords

Navigation