Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extent of Axillary Dissection: How Far Down Should We Dissect?

  • Surgical Techniques and Innovations
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the ‘gold standard’ surgical procedure for the management of metastatic axillary nodes in patients with invasive breast cancer. The procedure involves removal of all the lymph nodes below the inferior border of axillary vein along with fibro-fatty tissue from the axilla preserving important nerves and vessels. Following ALND, histological examination reveals the number of involved lymph node(s) along with findings of any perinodal spread of tumour which is considered a significant prognostic indicator according to the 8th Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer—AJCC 8th edition. The risk of locoregional and systemic recurrence is determined by the number of positive nodes, the stage of the cancer and the extent of axillary dissection. With complete ALND, the axillary recurrence varies from 0.5 to 2.5% at 10 years. The extent of clearance of axillary tissue in ALND has clearly defined anatomical boundaries all around except for the ‘inferior limit’ of dissection. The surgical literature does not provide a clear guideline regarding the lower border of axillary dissection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yan M, Abdi MA, Falkson C (2018) Axillary management in breast cancer patients: a comprehensive review of the key trials. Clin Breast Cancer 18(6):e1251–e1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giuliano AE, Edge SB, Hortobagyi GN (2018) Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25(7):1783–1785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson AM (1999) Axillary node clearance for breast cancer. A F R Coll Surg Edinb 23:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  4. O’Rourke MGE, Layt CWL (1993) Angular vein of the axilla and the anatomy of the subscapular vein important in axillary node dissection. Aust NZ J Surg 63:396–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan CY, Tan M (2003) Spatial relations of the angular vein, an important landmark in axillary node dissection. Br J Surg 90:948–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan MP, Ung OA (2007) Surgical approach to the angular vein of the axilla: an ‘Inverted’ technique of axillary dissection. Breast J 13(2):220–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khonji NI, Edwards R, Sweetland HM, Monypenny IJ, Mansel RE, Webster DJ (2002) Incidence of node in completion mastectomy specimens following breast conservation and axillary clearance. Br J Surg 89(10):1294–1295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chintamani (2010) Optimum axillary dissection in breast cancer—is angular vein a reliable spatial landmark? Indian J Surg Oncol 1(3):214–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chintamani (2014) Ten commandments of safe and optimum mastectomy for breast cancer. Indian J Surg 76(3):175–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamal Kataria.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Kamal Kataria, Afrin Sultana, Chitresh Sharma, Piyush Ranjan, Anita Dhar, Anurag Srivastava.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presentation or prior publication: None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sultana, A., Kataria, K., Sharma, C. et al. Extent of Axillary Dissection: How Far Down Should We Dissect?. Indian J Surg 84 (Suppl 3), 786–788 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03235-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03235-w

Keywords

Navigation