Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgery for Varicose Veins

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous surgical techniques are available to treat patients presenting with varicose veins. A balance is sought between advantages and disadvantages of the available techniques to render them suitable for the treatment of varicose veins depending on the patient’s clinical profile. The abolition of axial venous reflux to reduce ambulatory venous hypertension is the critical factor for successful treatment of varicose veins. Surgical ablation in the form of high ligation of sapheno-femoral junction and stripping of great saphenous vein is more than a century old surgical procedure that is still considered the gold standard in surgery. Various surgical techniques have evolved including elaborate open methods with extensive groin and thigh incisions, sub-fascial ligation of perforators using leg long incisions, endoscopic approach, and the recently developed techniques. The modern surgical approaches are minimally invasive, cosmetically appealing, use local anesthesia, and are performed under the guidance of ultrasonography. These surgeries can often be done as office procedures and demonstrate long-term results and similar hemodynamics in comparison to that of traditional open surgical methods. Although endovenous ablative therapies are preferred by both patients and physicians due to potential advantages such as less pain, short duration of hospital stay, faster recovery, technical ease, and short procedure time, the open surgical techniques still have an essential role and definitive indications in the modern clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutgers PH, Kitslaar PJ (1994) Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. Am J Surg 168:311–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80155-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D, Cooke S, Earnshaw JJ (1996) Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J VascEndovasc Surg 12:442–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80011-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aburhama B, Cambria C, Comerota D, Eidt F, Farber F, Forbes F, Geary Gloviczki G, Huber K, Mills M, Schermerhorn S, Sternbergh T, Upchurch W edited by Cronenwett JL and Johnston KW 2014, RUTHERFORD'S VASCULAR SURGERY, 8th edition, Elsevier Saunders

  4. Delis K, Knaggs A, Hobb J (2006) The non-saphenous vein of popliteal fossa: prevalence, patterns of reflux, hemodynamic quantification and clinical significance. J Vasc Surg 44:611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheshire N, Elias SM, Keagy B, Kolvenbach R, Leahy AL, Marston W, Pannier-Fischer F, Rabe E, Spitz GA (2002) Powered phlebectomy (TriVexTM) in treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg 16:488–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-001-0100-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parés JO, Juan J, Tellez R, Mata A, Moreno C, Quer FX, Suarez D, Codony I, Roca J (2010) Varicose vein surgery: stripping versus the CHIVA method: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:624–631. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d0d0a3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellmunt-Montoya S, Escribano JM, Dilme J, Martinez-Zapata MJ (2015) CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD009648. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009648.pub3

  8. Negro D (2012) C.H.I.V.A ou la cure hémodynamique de l’insuffisanceveineuseenambulatoire. Mot à motN°74. source https://www.chivatechnique.com/chivastatergy

  9. Pittaluga P, Chastanet S (2017) The ASVAL story. Vein Mag 10. A publication of vein directory.org. Accessed 01-08-2017 https://www.veindirectory.org/magazine/article/techniques-technology/the-asval-story

  10. Labropoulos N, Tassiopoulos AK, Kang SS, Mansour MA, Littooy FN, Baker WH (2000) Prevalence of deep venous reflux in patients with primary superficial vein incompetence. J Vasc Surg 32:663–668. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2000.110050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh JC, Bergan JJ, Beeman S, Comer TP (1994) Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping. Ann Vasc Surg 8:566–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sales CM, Bilof ML, Petrillo KA, Luka NL (1996) Correction of lower extremity deep venous incompetence by ablation of superficial venous reflux. Ann Vasc Surg 10:186–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02000764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adam DJ, Bello M, Hartshorne T, London NJ (2003) Role of superficial venous surgery in patients with combined superficial and segmental deep venous reflux. Eur J VascEndovasc Surg 25:469–472. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Neglen P, Einarsson E, Eklöf B (1993) The functional long-term value of different types of treatment for saphenous vein incompetence. J CardiovascSurg 34:295–301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. MacKenzie RK, Paisley A, Allan PL, Lee AJ, RuckleyCV BAW (2002) The effect of long saphenous vein stripping on quality of life. J Vasc Surg 35:1197–1203. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.121985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Michaels JA, Brazier JE, Campbell WB, MacIntyre JB, Palfreyman SJ, Ratcliffe J (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins. Br J Surg 93:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, Kistner RL, Pichot O, Schuller-Petrovic S, Sessa C (2003) Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg 38:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00228-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, Kistner RL, Pichot O, Sessa C, Schuller-Petrovic S (2005) Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J VascEndovasc Surg 29:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.09.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Perälä J, Ohtonen P, Heikkinen T, Wiik H, Karjalainen P, Haukipuro K, Juvonen T (2002) Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg 35:958–965. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.123096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hinchliffe RJ, Ubhi J, Beech A, Ellison J, Braithwaite BD (2006) A prospective randomised controlled trial of VNUS closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins. Eur J VascEndovasc Surg 31:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.07.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Perrin M, Eklöf B (2011) Randomized controlled trials in the treatment of varicose veins (2). Phlebolymphology 18:196–207

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rasmussen L, Lawaetz M, Serup J, Bjoern L, Vennits B, Blemings A, Eklof B (2013) Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins with 3-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg Venous LymphatDisord 1:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M, Blemings A, Lawaetz B, Eklof B (2007) Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short-term results. J Vasc Surg 46:308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Furtado de Medeiros CA, Luccas GC (2005) Comparison of endovenous treatment with an 810 nm laser versus conventional stripping of the great saphenous vein in patients with primary varicose veins. Dermatol Surg 31:1685–1694. https://doi.org/10.2310/6350.2005.31309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rass K, Frings N, Glowacki P, Hamsch C, Vogt T, Tilgen W (2012) Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study). Arch Dermatol 148:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2011.272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van den Broek TA (2008) Endovenous or open venous surgery: choices to make. Acta Chir Belg 108:656–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2008.11680311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC et al (2011) The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg 53(5 Suppl):2S-48S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dwerryhouse S, Davies B, Harradine K et al (1999) Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five – year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 29:589–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Michaels JA, Campbell WB, Brazier JE et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial, observational study and assessment of cost effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins (REACTIV trial). Health Technol Assess 10:1-196.iii-iv

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tisi PV, Beverly C, Rees A (2006) Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001732. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001732.pub2

  31. de Roos KP, Nieman FH, Neumann HA (2003) Ambulatory phlebectomy versus compression sclerotherapy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg 29:221–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Carradice D, Mekako AI, Hatfield J et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial of concomitant or sequential phlebectomy after endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins. Br J Surg 96:369–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. N. Sharmila.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharmila, D.N. Surgery for Varicose Veins. Indian J Surg 85 (Suppl 1), 22–29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03044-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03044-1

Keywords

Navigation