Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Laboratory Parameters in Preoperatively Predicting Perforated Appendicitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common pediatric surgical emergencies. Herewith we present our study to determine the correlation of preoperative laboratory investigations with intraoperative findings and histopathological report in children with appendicitis. A case series analysis of 60 patients undergoing appendicectomy was performed at the Department of Pediatric Surgery in All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India from July 2018 to July 2019. Historic records were analyzed. Parameters studied were age, gender, duration of symptoms, total leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein, ultrasonography, intraoperative findings, placement of drain in perforated cases, postoperative duration of antibiotics, and hospital stay. We compared the values of total leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein in perforated and non-perforated cases. Histopathological report of the specimens was retrieved. The mean age of the patients was 11.23 years (range 2–18 years) with a male preponderance of 2:1. The mean total leucocyte count was 16,772 cells/mm3 in the perforated group which was significantly higher than the non-perforated group 10,872cells/mm3 (p value<0.001). Mean C-reactive protein for the perforated group was 104.3mg/L which was significantly higher (p value 0.015) as compared to 40.69mg/L of the non-perforated group. We calculated a cutoff total leucocyte count of 17,930 cells/mm3, and C-reactive protein value of 32.9mg/L was found to be suitable preoperative parameters suggestive of perforated appendicitis. Ultrasonography correctly identified perforated appendicitis in 56% (n=23) patients. The negative appendicectomy rate at our hospital was <5% which is comparable to the previous studies. No significant difference was noted in the post-operative course and duration of hospital stay if drain was placed intraoperatively in perforated appendicitis. Biochemical parameters can accurately predict perforation in appendicitis preoperatively, and we propose administration of higher antibiotics according to perforated appendicitis protocol in patients who initially present with high total leucocyte count and C-reactive protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harnoss JC, Zelienka I, Probst P (2017) Antibiotics versus surgical therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials (PROSPERO 2015 CRD42015016882). Ann Surg 265:889–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aydin OU, Soylu L, Dandin O (2016) Laboratory in complicated appendicitis prediction and predictive value of monitoring. Bratisl Lek Listy 117:697–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim HY, Park JH, Lee YJ (2018) Systematic review and metaanalysis of CT features for differentiating complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Radiology 287:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubér M, Andersson M, Petersson BF, Olaison G, Andersson RE, Ekerfelt C (2010) Systemic Th17-like cytokine pattern in gangrenous appendicitis but not in phlegmonous appendicitis. Surgery 147:366–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S et al (2015) Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 386:1278–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang C-B, Li W-Q, Zheng J-W, Li X-W, Lin D-P, Chen X-F et al (2019) Preoperative assessment of complicated appendicitis through stress reaction and clinical manifestations. Medicine 98(23):e15768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P, Aarnio M, Rantanen T, Tuominen R, Hurme S, Virtanen J, Mecklin JP, Sand J, Jartti A, Rinta-Kiikka I, Grönroos JM (2015) Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:2340–2348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sallinen V, Akl EA, You JJ, Agarwal A, Shoucair S, Vandvik PO, Agoritsas T, Heels-Ansdell D, Guyatt GH, Tikkinen KAO (2016) Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 103:656–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15:557–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Andersson M, Andersson RE (2008) The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg 32:1843–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2015) Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 102:979–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Atema J. (2015) Diagnosis of intra-abdominal infections and management of catastrophic outcomes

  15. Baghdadi MA, Metwalli AEM, Abdelhamid MI (2019) Preoperative laboratory tests as predictors of complicated appendicitis. Egypt J Surg 38:535–541

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

• Study conception and design: Dr. Kirtikumar Rathod

• Data acquisition (Operating surgeons):

○ Dr. Kirtikumar Rathod

○ Dr. Avinash Jadhav

○ Dr. Manish Pathak

○ Dr. Rahul Saxena

○ Dr. Arvind Sinha

• Analysis and data interpretation: Dr. Ayushi Vig

• Drafting of the manuscript: Dr. Ayushi Vig

Critical revision: Dr. Avinash Jadhav

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirtikumar J Rathod.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vig, A., Rathod, K.J., Jadhav, A.S. et al. Role of Laboratory Parameters in Preoperatively Predicting Perforated Appendicitis. Indian J Surg 84, 136–140 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02849-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02849-4

Keywords

Navigation