Skip to main content
Log in

Abdominal Crunch Position In Spinal Anesthesia: a Novel Sitting Position

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous evidences suggested that traditional sitting position (flexion of knees approximately 90° and adduction of hips while feet rest on a stool) and lateral decubit position (sitting position with maximum extension of knees, adduction of hips, and forward bending) both reversed the lumbar lordosis and the number of spinal needle-bone contacts were identical when placing patients in these positions for neuraxial block.

Objectives

In this study, we suggested that abdominal crunch position reverses the lumbar lordosis and increase the gap of interspinal distance better than a traditional sitting position and lateral decubit position.

Patients and Methods

One hundred patients ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) class I or II aged over 18 years old scheduled for elective surgeries under elective spinal anesthesia. We compared the traditional sitting, lateral decubit position, and abdominal crunch position. Our primary endpoint was to detect the increasing of interspinal gap by ultrasound.

Results

The gap of interspinal distance was statistically higher in the abdominal crunch position compared to traditional sitting position and lateral decubit position (P = 0.01).

Conclusions

We suggested that the abdominal crunch position can to help our colleagues especially with the maximum spinal interval in the spinal anesthesia management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afolayan JM, Areo PO, Adegun PT, Ogundipe KO, Filani AB (2017) Comparison of ease of induction of spinal anaesthesia in sitting with legs parallel on the table versus traditional sitting position. Pan Afr Med J 28(1). https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.28.223.6992

  2. Defloor T (2000) The effect of position and mattress on interface pressure. Appl Nurs Res 13(1):2–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Manggala SK, Tantri AR, Satoto D (2016) Comparison of successful spinal needle placement between crossed-leg sitting position and traditional sitting position in patients undergoing urology surgery. Anesthesiol Pain Med 6(4):e39314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohammadi SS, Hassani M, Marashi SM (2014) Comparing the squatting position and traditional sitting position for ease of spinal needle placement: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiol Pain Med 4(2):e13969

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mohammadi SS, Piri M, Khajehnasiri A (2017) Comparing three different modified sitting positions for ease of spinal needle insertion in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. AnesthesiolPain Med 7(5):e55932

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shankar H, Rajput K, Murugiah K (2012) Correlation between spinous process dimensions and ease of spinal anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 56(3):250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrofsky JS, Batt J, Davis N, Lohman E, Laymon M, De Leon GE et al (2007) Core muscle activity during exercise on a mini stability ball compared with abdominal crunches on the floor and on a swiss ball. J Appl Res Clin Exp Ther 7(3):255

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pierce SE (2017) Electromyographical comparison of the abdominal crunch to planks performed with and without a suspension trainer. California State University, Fresno

    Google Scholar 

  9. Handa N, Yamamoto H, Tani T, Kawakami T, Takemasa R (2000) The effect of trunk muscle exercises in patients over 40 years of age with chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sci 5(3):210–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ignasiak D, Rüeger A, Ferguson SJ (2017) Multi-segmental thoracic spine kinematics measured dynamically in the young and elderly during flexion. Hum Mov Sci 54:230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Butterworth J, Mackey D, Wasnick J (2013) Spinal, epidural, & caudal blocks. Morgan & Mikhail's clinical anesthesiology, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 953–956

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martin-Salvaj G, Van EG, Forster A, Schweizer A, Iselin-Chaves I, Gamulin Z (1994) Influence of duration of lateral decubitus on the spread of hyperbaric tetracaine during spinal anesthesia: a prospective time-response study. Anesth Analg 79(6):1107–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McAfee PC, Eiserman L, Cunningham BW, Mullinix KA, Brooks DM (2017) Middle column gap balancing to predict optimal anterior structural support and spinal height in spinal reconstructive surgery. Spine. 42:S19–S20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tessler MJ, Kardash K, Wahba RM, Kleiman SJ, Trihas ST, Rossignol M (1999) The performance of spinal anesthesia is marginally more difficult in the elderly. Reg Anesth Pain Med 24(2):126–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sprung J, Bourke DL, Grass J, Hammel J, Mascha E, Thomas P et al (1999) Predicting the difficult neuraxial block: a prospective study. Anesth Analg 89(2):384–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bagheri R, Takamjani IE, Dadgoo M, Ahmadi A, Sarrafzadeh J, Pourahmadi MR et al (2018) Gender-related differences in reliability of thorax, lumbar, and pelvis kinematics during gait in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Ann Rehabil Med 42(2):239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Biviá-Roig G, Lisón JF, Sánchez-Zuriaga D (2019) Effects of pregnancy on lumbar motion patterns and muscle responses. Spine J 19(2):364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Norris MC (1988) Height, weight, and the spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient. Anesth Analg 67(6):555–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Siddiqui KM, Ali MA, Ullah H (2016) Comparison of spinal anesthesia dosage based on height and weight versus height alone in patients undergoing elective cesarean section. Korean J Anesthesiol 69(2):143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitkänen MT (1987) Body mass and spread of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 66(2):127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasin Tire.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tire, Y., Mermer, A. & Kozanhan, B. Abdominal Crunch Position In Spinal Anesthesia: a Novel Sitting Position. Indian J Surg 83, 1481–1485 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02744-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02744-y

Keywords

Navigation