Abstract
Since the early twentieth century, diathermy has been increasingly used for tissue dissection and haemostasis, but the surgeons, however, are reluctant to use surgical diathermy for making skin incisions. This reluctance is now being challenged by multiple studies suggesting diathermy to be a safer option. This was a randomised, clinical study conducted in the department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery at Calcutta Medical Research Institute, Kolkata in 2017. The study was done to evaluate the diathermy as an effective alternative to scalpel blade in making skin incisions in elective abdominal surgeries. A total of 72 patients undergoing abdominal surgeries were included and randomly divided into diathermy and scalpel groups. Both groups were compared based on incisional blood loss, early postoperative pain, wound complication rates, and cosmetic outcome of scar by Patient-Observer Scar Assessment Scale. After exclusion, a total of 72 patients, 36 each from the two groups, were analysed based on the above mentioned parameters. We found that the incisional blood loss is significantly lesser in the diathermy group in comparison to that of the scalpel group (p < 0.001). Also, the early postoperative pain was significantly lesser in the diathermy group (p < 0.001). Postoperative wound complication rates were comparable between the two groups, and postoperative scar cosmesis is significantly better with the use of diathermy (p < 0.001). In our study, we found that the diathermy is an effective and safe alternative to the steel scalpel blade for making abdominal skin incisions in elective procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnson C, Serpell J (1990) Wound infection after abdominal incision with scalpel or diathermy. Br J Surg 77(6):626–627
Shivagouda P et al (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of diathermy incision versus scalpel incision over skin in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Recent Res Sci Technol 2:44–47
Neumayer L (2017) NasrinGhalyaie. Principles of preoperative and operative surgery. Sabiston Textbook Surg 20:235–236
Siraj A et al (2011) Elective midline laparotomy: a comparison of diathermy and scalpel incisions. Prof Med J 18:106–111
Kumar V, Tewari M, Shukla HS (2011) A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer. Indian J Cancer 48:216–219
Rappaport WD, Hunter GC, Allen R, Lick S, Halldorsson A, Chvapil T, Holcomb M, Chvapil M (1990) Effect of electrocautery on wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Am J Surg 160:618–620
Keenan KM, Rodeheaver GT, Kenney JG, Edlich RF (1984) Surgical cautery revisited. Am J Surg 147:818–821
Papay FA, Stein J, Luciano M, Zins JE (1998) The microdissection cautery needle versus the cold scalpel in bi-coronal incisions. J Craniofac Surg 9:344–347
Peter W et al (1998) Electric cautery lowers the contamination threshold for infection of laparotomies. Am J Surg 175:263–266
Ly J, Mittal A, Windsor J (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision. Br J Surg 99:613–620
Cuschieri A et al (1995) Surgical craft and technology. Essent Surg Pract 1:37–68
Cushing H (1989) Electrosurgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors with a preliminary note on a new surgical current generator. Surg Gynecol Obstet 64:751–784
Laughlin SA, Dudley DK (1992) Electrosurg Clin Dermatol 10:285–290
Sigel B, Dunn MR (1965) The mechanism of blood vessel closure by high-frequency electrocoagulation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 121:823–833
Talpur AA et al (2015) Randomized, clinical trial on diathermy and scalpel incisions in elective general surgery. IRCMJ. 17:14–21
Lee BJ et al (2014) Advanced cutting effect system versus cold steel scalpel: a comparative wound healing and scar formation in targeted surgical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2:23–34
Hjermstad MJ (2011) Studies comparing Numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag 41:1073–1093
Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YAM, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PPM (2004) The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1960–1965
Lalgudi DP, NiteshBalaji et al (2015) Comparison of electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in midline abdominal surgery – a double blind randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 19:78–82
O’Connor JL, Bloom DA (1996) William T. Bovie and electrosurgery. Surgery. 119:390–396
Parker EO 3rd. (1984) Electrosurgical burn at the site of an oesophageal temperature probe. Anaesthesiology. 61:93–95
Chalya PL, Mchembe MD, Mabula JB et al (2013) Diathermy versus Scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. East Centr Afr j Surg 18:71–77
Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, McNamara D, Deasy J (2001) Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 88:41–44
Aird LN, Bristol SG et al (2015) Randomized double-blind trial comparing the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incisions. Br J Surg 102:489–494
Stupart DA, Sim FW et al (2016) Cautery versus scalpel for abdominal skin incisions: a double blind, randomized crossover trial of scar cosmesis. ANZ J Surg 86:303–306
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This is an original article with significant contributions from all the above authors.
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Karthik Shetty is the first author and principal investigator.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shetty, K., Shetty, D. & Nemani, P.K. Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial of Scalpel Versus Diathermy for Abdominal Skin Incisions. Indian J Surg 83, 1464–1469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02734-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02734-0