Abstract
We are now living in the era of shared decision making and informed consent where the decision to undergo surgery is no longer decided by the operating surgeon alone. This involves a degree of decisiveness on the part of the patient. Decisional conflict is defined as a state of uncertainty about the course of action to be taken by the patients. Decisional conflict scale is a 16-item validated psychometric scale that measures decisional conflict objectively. In this study, we aim to introduce the concept of a decisional conflict and document its prevalence in patients undergoing surgery in a tertiary care center. This was a prospective observational study carried out in a tertiary care center between September 2019 and March 2020. The decisional conflict scale data was collected from the patients in the ward before shifting them to the operating theater. The maximum score possible was 80 and the minimum was 16. The higher the score is, the lesser the conflict. We chose an arbitrary cut-off value of 75% which equated to a score of 60 on the scale. The modified Kuppuswamy scale was used to calculate the socioeconomic status of patients. We had a total of 227 patients enrolled in the study. In our study, it was noted that 169 (74.45%) patients did not have a decisional conflict while 58 (25.55%) had a decisional conflict. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of education, occupation, income, and socioeconomic status. On subgroup analysis, it was noted that patients had a maximum conflict in 2 questions: (1) information about the available choices and (2) the risks and complications of the surgery. Measuring decisional conflict in surgical patients is feasible. Decisional conflict cuts across groups irrespective of patient gender, education, occupation, income, and socioeconomic status.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ (2013) Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med 368(1):6–8
Barr PJ, Elwyn G (2016) Measurement challenges in shared decision making: putting the ‘patient’ in patient-reported measures. Health Expect 19(5):993–1001
O'Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15(1):25–30
Saleem SM (2020) Modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale updated for the year 2020. Indian Journal of Forensic and Community Medicine 7(1):1–3
Lam WW, Kwok M, Chan M, Hung WK, Ying M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Yoon S, Fielding R (2014) Does the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing a decision for breast cancer surgery? Patient Educ Couns 94(2):243
Manne SL, Topham N, D’Agostino TA, Myers Virtue S, Kirstein L, Brill K, Manning C, Grana G, Schwartz MD, Ohman-Strickland P (2016) Acceptability and pilot efficacy trial of a web-based breast reconstruction decision support aid for women considering mastectomy. Psycho-oncology. 25(12):1424–1433
Jha S, Duckett J (2019) Utility of patient decision aids (PDA) in stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 30(9):1483–1486
Lam WW, Chan M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Fielding R (2013) Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 31(23):2879–2885
Boss EF, Mehta N, Nagarajan N, Links A, Benke JR, Berger Z, Espinel A, Meier J, Lipstein EA (2016) Shared decision making and choice for elective surgical care: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154(3):405–420
Lin PJ, Fang SY, Kuo YL (2019) Development and usability testing of a decision support app for women considering breast reconstruction surgery. J Cancer Educ:1–8
Acknowledgments
All the authors would like to thank Dr. Rajasekhara Reddy H. V, Dr. Ramakrishna H.K, Dr. Ravishankar H R, and Dr. Niranjan P for their suggestions, and Dr. Janani S. V, Dr. Hariharasaran I, and Dr. Rajesh for their help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors have contributed equally.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The study protocol was approved by the hospital ethics committee.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reddy, C.M., Lakshmikantha, N. & K, L. Decisional Conflict in Surgical Patients. Indian J Surg 83, 1470–1473 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02722-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02722-4