Consent in Surgical Practice


Informed consent addresses core principles of medical ethics—beneficence, nonmaleficence and autonomy. In this era of ever-increasing legal and social scrutiny of complex surgical procedures, informed consent is not just an ethical debate but a legal requirement. Unfortunately, many surgeons, to their own peril, still see it as a mere formality. This article deliberates upon informed consent process in surgical practice with emphasis on Indian perspectives and discusses common scenarios and special situations through legal citations in order to sensitize surgeons regarding their obligations pertaining to informed consent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data Availability

Not applicable.


  1. 1.

    NHS (2017) Consent to treatment. Accessed 14 Sep 2020

  2. 2.

    Bruce L (2020) A pot ignored boils on: sustained calls for explicit consent of intimate medical exams. Hec Forum:1–21.

  3. 3.

    Tribble C, Julliard W (2019) First, we do harm: obtaining informed consent for surgical procedures. Heart Surg Forum 22:E423–E428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital | Project Gutenberg Self-Publishing - eBooks | Read eBooks online. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  5. 5.

    Samira Kohli vs Dr. Prabha Manchanda & Anr on 16 January, 2008. Accessed 4 Oct 2020

  6. 6.

    MCI (2002) Ethics Regulations-2002. Accessed 14 Sep 2020

  7. 7.

    Dr. Janaki S. Kumar and Another v Sarafunnisa on 21 June 1999 - Judgement - LawyerServices. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  8. 8.

    Doyal L (2001) Closing the gap between professional teaching and practice. BMJ 322:685–686

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Director General Indian Council of Medical Research (2006) Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  10. 10.

    Dr. T.T. Thomas vs Smt. Elisa And Ors. on 11 August, 1986. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  11. 11.

    Jones JW, McCullough LB, Richman BW (2007) A comprehensive primer of surgical informed consent. Surg Clin N Am 87:903–918, viii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ashraf B, Saaiq M, Zaman K-U (2014) Qualitative study of Nocebo Phenomenon (NP) involved in doctor-patient communication. Int J Health Policy Manag 3:23–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  14. 14.

    Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital | (1985) 1 All ER 643 | United Kingdom House of Lords | Judgment | Law | CaseMine. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  15. 15.

    Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 | Casetext Search + Citator. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  16. 16.

    Pearce & Anor v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust | (1998) EWCA Civ 877 | England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) | Judgment | Law | CaseMine. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  17. 17.

    Langerman A, Siegler M, Angelos P (2016) Intraoperative decision making: the decision to perform additional, unplanned procedures on anesthetized patients. J Am Coll Surg 222:956–960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D (2006) The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 166:493–497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Spatz ES, Suter LG, George E, Perez M, Curry L, Desai V, Bao H, Geary LL, Herrin J, Lin Z, Bernheim SM, Krumholz HM (2020) An instrument for assessing the quality of informed consent documents for elective procedures: development and testing. BMJ Open 10:e033297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rector TS (2008) How should we communicate the likelihood of risks to inform decisions about consent? IRB Ethics Hum Res 30:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    OR Manager Inc (2009) Frequent questions on informed consent. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  22. 22.

    Kumar A, Mullick P, Prakash S, Bharadwaj A (2015) Consent and the Indian medical practitioner. Indian J Anaesth 59:695–700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rao N (2010) Ethics of medical practice. In: textbook of forensic medicine and toxicology, 2nd edn. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., New Delhi, pp 23–44

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Herring J (2012) Consent to treatment. In: Medical law & ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, UK, pp 149–220

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vinod Khanna vs R.G. Stone urology and laparoscopy ... on 6 July, 2020. Accessed 3 Dec 2020

  26. 26.

    Singh TSS (2017) Is it time to separate consent for anesthesia from consent for surgery? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 33:112–113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Waisel D (2010) Legal aspects of anesthesia care. In: Miller R (ed) Miller’s anesthesia, 7th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tewari A, Garg S (2003) Informed consent and anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 47:311–312

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Charan Lal Sahu v. Union Of India . | Supreme Court Of India | Judgment | Law | CaseMine. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  30. 30.

    Pecanac KE, Kehler JM, Brasel KJ, Cooper Z, Steffens NM, McKneally MF, Schwarze ML (2014) It’s big surgery: preoperative expressions of risk, responsibility, and commitment to treatment after high-risk operations. Ann Surg 259:458–463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jones JW, McCullough LB (2015) What is meant by high-risk informed consent? J Vasc Surg 62:510–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mani RK, Amin P, Chawla R et al (2012) Guidelines for end-of-life and palliative care in Indian intensive care units: ISCCM consensus Ethical Position Statement. Indian J Crit Care Med Peer-Rev 16:166–181.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Law Commission of India (2006) Medical treatment of terminally ill patients (for the protection of patients and medical practitioners). Accessed 5 Oct 2020

  34. 34.

    Common Cause (A Regd. Society) vs Union Of India on 9 March, 2018. Accessed 5 Oct 2020

  35. 35.

    OHCHR | Principles for the protection of persons with mental illness. Accessed 28 Nov 2020

  36. 36.

    Murty OP (2013) Uniform guidelines for postmortem work in India. J Forensic Med Toxicol 30(1 & 2):1–137

  37. 37.

    Government of India (1994) Transplant of human organs act, 1994. http://www.medindianet/tho/thobill1.asp. Accessed 14 Sep 2020

  38. 38.

    (1974) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. An act to consolidate and amend the law relating to criminal procedure. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  39. 39.

    Board of Governors (2020) Telemedicine practice guidelines Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  40. 40.

    (2015) The Gazette of India Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  41. 41.

    Chauhan RC, Purty AJ, Singh N (2015) Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India. Perspect Clin Res 6:159–162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Burkle CM, Anderson KA, Xiong Y, Guerra AE, Tschida-Reuter DA (2017) Assessment of the efficiency of language interpreter services in a busy surgical and procedural practice. BMC Health Serv Res 17:456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    American Health Lawyers Association (2016) Understanding informed consent: a guide for active-duty military and military medical beneficiaries. Accessed 24 Nov 2020

  44. 44.

    Section 3 in The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act (1971) Accessed 28 Nov 2020

  45. 45.

    Research studies and standards division ministry of health and family welfare (2006) Standards for female and male sterilization services. Accessed 6 Oct 202046

  46. 46.

    Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh on 26 March, 2007. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  47. 47.

    Parihar M (2004) ICOG FOGSI recommendations for good clinical practice on female sterilization. Accessed 6 Oct 202048

  48. 48.

    Jones JW, McCullough LB (2002) Consent for residents to perform surgery. J Vasc Surg 36:655–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bagnall NM, Pucher PH, Johnston MJ, Arora S, Athanasiou T, Faiz O, Darzi LA (2017) Informing the process of consent for surgery: identification of key constructs and quality factors. J Surg Res 209:86–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bindey Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Consent taken.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, B., Ali, M., Kumar, M. et al. Consent in Surgical Practice. Indian J Surg (2021).

Download citation


  • Informed consent
  • Surgery
  • Jurisprudence
  • Ethics