Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Lumen Occlusion on Outcomes in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rectal cancer presenting with intestinal obstruction has historically been associated with poor outcomes. However, most of these studies were published before the neoadjuvant chemoradiation era. We intended to look for the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer presenting with and without luminal occlusion. One hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients, compliant with the treatment protocol from January 2013 to May 2014 were included in the study. They were classified as lumen-occluding or non-lumen-occluding based on colonoscopy, and outcomes were compared in the 2 groups. The two groups had similar demographic profiles. Median follow-up time of the study cohort was 5 years. The 5-year overall survival was 72.2% and 54.8% in the lumen non-occluding and lumen-occluding group, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (p–0.34). However, 5-year disease-free survival was 65.1% and 39.9% in the non-occluding group and lumen-occluding group, respectively (p = 0.02). This difference in disease-free survival was not significant on multivariate analysis (p–0.07). Lumen-occluding growths on colonoscopy are not associated with poor outcomes in today’s era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phillips RKS, Hittinger R, Fry KS et al (1985) Malignant large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 72(4):296–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohman U (1982) Prognosis in patients with obstructing colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 143(6):742–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bass G, Fleming C, Conneely J et al (2009) Emergency first presentation of colorectal cancer predicts significantly poorer outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 52(4):672–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mc Ardle CS, Hole DJ (2004) Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5–year survival. Br J Surg 91(5):605–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pokharkar AB, Bhandare M, Patil P, Mehta S et al (2017) Young Vs Old Colorectal cancer in Indian subcontinent: a tertiary care center experience. Indian J Surg Oncol 8(4):491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen YL, Chang WC, Hsu HH, Hsu CW et al (2013) An evolutionary role of the ED: outcomes of patients with colorectal cancers presenting to the ED were not compromised. Am J Emerg Med 31(4):646–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuffy M, Abir F, Audisio RA, Longo WE (2004) Colorectal cancer presenting as surgical emergencies. Surg Oncol 13(2-3):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coco C, Verbo A, Manno A, Mattana C et al (2005) Impact of emergency surgery in the outcome of rectal and left colon carcinoma. World J Surg 29(11):1458–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hogan J, Samaha G, burke J et al (2015) Emergency presenting colon cancer is an independent predictor of adverse disease free survival. Int Surg 100:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliphant R, Mansouri D, Nicholson GA, Mcmillan DC et al (2014) Emergency presentation of node-negative colorectal cancer treated with curative surgery is associated with poorer short and longer-term survival. Int J Color Dis 29(5):591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manning AT, Waldron R, Barry K (2006) Poor awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms: a preventable cause of emergency and late stage presentation. Ir J Med Sci 175:55–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Archampong D, Borowski D, Iversen LH (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD005391

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mealy K, Salman A, Arthur G (1988) Definitive one-stage emergency large bowel surgery. Br J Surg 75(12):1216–1219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Biondo S, Martí-Ragué J, Kreisler E, Parés D et al (2005) A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer. Am J Surg 189(4):377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Diggs JC, Xu F, Diaz M et al (2007) Failure to screen: predictors and burden of emergency colorectal cancer resection. Am J Manag Care 13(3):157–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smothers L, Hynan L, Fleming J, Turnage R et al (2003) Emergency surgery for colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 46(1):24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Li C (2006) Risk factors for obstruction, perforation, or emergency admission at presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(5):1098–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell AD, Inglis KM, Murdoch JM, Porter GA (2007) Emergency room presentation of colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 14(3):1099–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weixler B, Warschkow R, Ramser M et al (2016) Urgent surgery after emergency presentation for colorectal cancer has no impact on overall and disease-free survival: a propensity score analysis. BMC Cancer 16:208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avanish Saklani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study (retrospective), formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Impact of lumen occlusion/obstruction is not studied/reported in post NACTRT era; our study is the first to look into this issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shinde, R.S., Gupta, A., Patil, P. et al. Impact of Lumen Occlusion on Outcomes in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma. Indian J Surg 83, 1401–1406 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02678-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02678-x

Keywords

Navigation