Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ignorance Led Fatal Complication of Shockwave Lithotripsy

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is often marketed as a non-invasive and absolutely safe out-patient treatment, and hence many non-trained medical professionals in India have acquired this technology. Presented here is a patient who developed a life-threatening renal and peri-renal hematoma after receiving 4500 shockwaves for a renal calculus. The treating physician, a non-allopathic doctor, carried out SWL despite the patient’s uncontrolled hypertension and anticoagulant drugs. The large expanding hematoma needed emergency nephrectomy. The patient died in the next 48 h due to persistent bleeding and disseminated intravascular coagulation. This case brings to light that proper training is needed even for such seemingly “risk-free” treatments. Also, legislations and regulations are needed to monitor sales of such vital equipment to non-qualified professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Yes

References

  1. Knapp PM, Kulb TB, Lingeman JE, Newman DM, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE (1988) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-induced perirenal hematomas. J Urol. 139:700–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Telegrafo M, Carluccio DA, Rella L, Ianora AA, Angelelli G, Moschetta M (2016) Diagnostic and prognostic role of computed tomography in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy complications. Urol Ann. 8:168–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Knorr PA, Woodside JR (1990) Large perirenal hematoma after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Urology. 35:151–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reynolds LF, Kroczak T, Pace KT (2018) Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes. Asian J Urol. 5:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Willis LR, Evan AP, Connors BA, Shao Y, Blomgren PM, Pratt JH (2005) Shockwave lithotripsy: dose-related effects on renal structure, hemodynamics, and tubular function. J Endourol. 19:90–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Labanaris AP, Kühn R, Schott GE, Zugor V (2007) Perirenal hematomas induced by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Therapeutic management. ScientificWorldJournal 7:1563–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tailly GG (2013) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy today. Indian J Urol. 29:200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj N. Maheshwari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

Yes

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gadgil, N.D., Maheshwari, P.N. Ignorance Led Fatal Complication of Shockwave Lithotripsy. Indian J Surg 83, 1567–1569 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02677-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02677-y

Keywords

Navigation