Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Small Bowel Anastomosis Single-Layer Close Suturing—Open-Label Case Series

  • Surgical Techniques and Innovations
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In single-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis, the inter-suture distance is conventionally kept at 4 to 5 mm. There is no human study which has described which is the appropriate inter-suture distance. A study that has investigated the gap between sutures in rats concluded that a small distance between sutures (1.5 mm) improves apposition compared with a larger distance (2.5 mm). We hypothesize that in humans also close inter-suture distance should have better apposition and healing. We performed case series to evaluate the rate of anastomotic leak and anastomotic stricture in ileoileal and ileocolic anastomosis with close inter-suture distance of 3 mm. The patients of ileostomy closure were taken for the study, and anastomosis was hand-sewn, single layer, full thickness, interrupted with 3-0 polydioxanone or polyglactin. We performed anastomosis in 38 patients. Five patients had superficial surgical site infection, which was managed with dressing and required secondary skin closure. No patients had an anastomotic leak. No patient had stricture related complaints in the mean follow-up period of 16 months (range 6 to 22 months). Our case series on anastomotic technique looks promising in decreasing anastomotic complications. A comparative study with randomization can throw more light on it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Available.

References

  1. Sajid MS, Siddiqui MR, Baig MK (2012) Single layer versus double layer suture anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD005477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shikata S, Yamagishi H, Taji Y, Shimada T, Noguchi Y (2006) Single versus two- layer intestinal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg 6:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Turrentine FE, Denlinger CE, Simpson VB, Garwood RA, Guerlain S, Agrawal A, Friel CM, LaPar DJ, Stukenborg GJ, Jones RS (2015) Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lembert A. Me’moire sur L’ente’roraphie avec la description d’un proce’de´ nouveau pour pratiquer cette ope’ration chirurgical (1826) In: Breschet MG, ed. Re’pertoire Ge’ne’ral d’Anatomie et de Physiologie Pathologique et des Cliniques Chirurgicale. Vol 2. Paris, France: Boiste Fils 100–107

  5. Waninger J, Kauffmann GW, Shah IA, Farthmann EH (1992) Influence of the distance between interrupted sutures and the tension of sutures on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 163(3):319–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Yusuf Afaque.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Institutional ethical approval taken.

Consent to Participate

Taken.

Consent for Publication

Taken.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afaque, M.Y., Alam, J., Riyaz, M. et al. Small Bowel Anastomosis Single-Layer Close Suturing—Open-Label Case Series. Indian J Surg 83, 999–1001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02479-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02479-2

Keywords

Navigation