Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prevention of Esophageal-Stomach Anastomosis Leakage After Esophagectomy—an Analysis of 1243 Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To summarize the tips for the prevention of esophageal anastomosis leakage. Improvement in clinical techniques and treatments has decreased anastomotic leakage occurrence, but it remains one of the main causes of death after esophageal and gastric surgery. After efforts to improve outcomes in the past 7 years, we observed only four cases of anastomotic leakage. Thus, here we summarize the technical details for peer reference. The tips for preventing esophageal-stomach anastomosis fistula include preoperative general nutrition improvement and esophageal edema-reducing measures. During surgery, technical prevention measures include protection and improvement of anastomosis technology. Postoperative measures include maintaining cervical anteflexion position, reduced anastomotic tension, and circulation-invigorating medicines to improve anastomotic circulation. Between January 2006 and December 2012, 1243 patients with esophageal cancer underwent resection of the esophagus and esophagogastrostomy. There were 885 male patients and 358 female patients, aged 40 to 78 years old, with an average age of 63.4 ± 5.6 years. The esophageal-stomach anastomotic leakage occurred in four cases, for an incidence rate of only 0.32% (4/1243). In these four detected cases, three patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital. One patient died. The application of improved technical measures may reduce postoperative esophageal anastomotic leakage incidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang Z (2010) Peking union medical college thoracic surgery, Second edn. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turkyilmaz A, Eroglu A, Aydin Y, Tekinbas C, Muharrem Erol M, Karaoglanoglu N (2009) The management of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 22(2):119–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00866.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Messager M, Warlaumont M, Renaud F, Marin H, Branche J, Piessen G, Mariette C (2017) Recent improvements in the management of esophageal anastomotic leak after surgery for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(2):258–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC (2013) Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg 96(6):1919–1926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB (2013) Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20(13):4274–4281. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3189-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu QX, Deng XF, Hou B, Min JX, Dai JG (2014) Preventing and localizing esophagogastric anastomosis leakage by sleeve-wrapping of the pedicled omentum. World J Gastroenterol 20(43):16282–16286. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16282

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kechagias A, van Rossum PS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2016) Ischemic conditioning of the stomach in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 101(4):1614–1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones CE, Watson TJ (2015) Anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 25(4):449–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2015.07.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crofts TJ (2000) Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for middle and lower third oesophageal lesions--how we do it. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45(5):296–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alanezi K, Urschel JD (2004) Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10(2):71–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu K (2003) Kaishi Gu thoracic and cardiac surgery. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sauvanet A, Baltar J, Le Mee J, Belghiti J (1998) Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 85(10):1446–1449. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00869.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell JD (2006) Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 16(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giuli R, Gignoux M (1980) Treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus. Retrospective study of 2,400 patients. Ann Surg 192(1):44–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blewett CJ, Miller JD, Young JE, Bennett WF, Urschel JD (2001) Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 7(2):75–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Correa AM, Hess K, Putnam JB Jr, Ajani JA, Dolormente M, Francisco R, Komaki RR, Lara A, Martin F, Rice DC, Sarabia AJ, Smythe WR, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Roth JA (2002) Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 236(3):376–384; discussion 384-375. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000027925.23604.5c

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 230(3):392–400 discussion 400-393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hankins JR, Attar S, Coughlin TR Jr, Miller JE, Hebel JR, Suter CM, McLaughlin JS (1989) Carcinoma of the esophagus: a comparison of the results of transhiatal versus transthoracic resection. Ann Thorac Surg 47(5):700–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM (2006) Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg 82(5):1857–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dai JG, Zhang ZY, Min JX, Huang XB, Wang JS (2011) Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery 149(3):404–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.08.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ming Cai and Yuan Weng contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, the Fourth People’s Hospital of Wuxi, Wuxi, 214000, China

    Ming Cai, Yuan Weng, Zhiqiang Wang, Jun Zhu & Qingjun You

Authors
  1. Ming Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuan Weng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhiqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jun Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qingjun You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Cai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, M., Weng, Y., Wang, Z. et al. Prevention of Esophageal-Stomach Anastomosis Leakage After Esophagectomy—an Analysis of 1243 Patients. Indian J Surg 82, 775–779 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02100-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02100-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation