Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinico-pathological Evaluation and Outcomes of Emergency Right Hemicolectomies in the HIV Era

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emergency right hemicolectomies (RH) are attended by high morbidity and mortality. A primary ileocolic anastomosis (PA) or stoma may be performed, depending upon clinical risk factors. In HIV/AIDS patients, multiple pathologies involve the ileo-caecal area, and may necessitate a RH. To provide a clinico-pathological evaluation and outcome analysis of emergency RH. A retrospective chart analysis of 55 patients undergoing an emergency RH in two regional referral centres in KwaZulu-Natal, from January 2013 to December 2018, was undertaken. A total of 55 patients, median age 35 (range 12–83 years), underwent emergency RH. Seventeen patients were HIV-positive (30.9%) and 36 HIV-negative (65.5%), while 2 were not tested. A RH with PA was more commonly performed (61.8%). There was a higher rate of metabolic acidosis (p = 0.0046) and inotropic support (p = 0.001) in the RH and ileostomy cohort. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the RH and ileostomy cohort (42.9% vs 14.7%), p = 0.0275. There was a significantly higher rate of RH and ileostomy done in the HIV-positive cohort than in the HIV-negative cohort (58.8% vs 27.7%), p = 0.03. Ileo-caecal tuberculosis was more common in HIV-positive patients (35.3% vs 2.8%), p = 0.003. Overall, complicated appendicitis was the most common indication for RH (38.2%). Emergency RH with ileostomy is performed more often in the physiologically unstable patient and, hence, has a high mortality rate. Ileo-caecal TB is more common in HIV-positive patients leading to a higher ileostomy rate. Complicated appendicitis was the most common indication for emergency RH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meintjies G (2014) Management challenges in tuberculosis and HIV. S Afr Med J 104:885. https://doi.org/10.17196/SAMJ.9121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marshall JB (1993) Tuberculosis of the gastrointestinal tract and peritoneum. Am J Gastroenterol 88(7):989–999. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199404000-00031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farinha HT, Melloul E, Hahnloser D et al (2016) Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible? World J Emerg Surg 11:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0073-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dindo D, Dimartinez N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240(4):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae61.8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jessen M, Nerstrøm M, Wilbek TE, Roepstorff S, Rasmussen MS, Krarup PM (2016) Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after right hemicolectomy. Int J Color Dis 31(9):1619–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2623-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyrzykowski AD, Feliciano DV, George TA et al (2005) Emergent right hemicolectomies. Am Surg 71(8):653–656 discussion 656-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan KK, Liu JZ, Yeow Y et al (2011) Is emergency right hemicolectomy still associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates? An institution’s experience of 207 cases over 6 years. Int J Color Dis 26(9):1157–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1203-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe M, Suzuki H, Nomura S et al (2014) Risk factors for surgical site infection in emergency colorectal surgery: a retrospective analysis. Surg Infect 15(3):256–261. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2012.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weledji PE, Nsagha D, Chichom A et al (2015) Gastrointestinal surgery and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Med Surg 4(1):36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2014.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Islam J, Clarke DL, Thomson SR (2014) Lessons from emergency laparotomy for abdominal tuberculosis in the HIV/AIDS era. S Afr J Surg 52(1):10–12. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJS.1604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chirokar K, Garg N, Jain AK (2016) Surgical management of abdominal tuberculosis; a retrospective study from Central India. Int Surg J 3(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20151217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gigabhoy R, Cheddie S, Singh B (2018) Appendicitis in the HIV era: a South African perspective. Indian J Surg 80(3):207–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-016-1564-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guvan H, Koc B, Saglam F et al (2014) Emergency right hemicolectomy for inflammatory cecal masses mimicking acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 9:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-9-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kong V, Clarke DL, Sartorius B (2015) Acute appendicitis in the developing world is a morbid disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(5):390–395. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588415X14181254790608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shalen Cheddie.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of the University of KwaZulu - Natal.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bundhoo, G., Kader, S., Manneh, C.G. et al. Clinico-pathological Evaluation and Outcomes of Emergency Right Hemicolectomies in the HIV Era. Indian J Surg 82, 604–609 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02079-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02079-0

Keywords

Navigation