Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Limited Parenchyma-Sparing Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Neuroendocrine Tumors and Cystic Neoplasms—the Use of Duodenum-Preserving Head Resection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treating benign tumors of the pancreatic head by using duodenum-preserving total or subtotal pancreatic head resection (DPPHRt/s) has proven to reduce mortality and morbidity with a positive postoperative outcome, when compared with the standard approach which is represented by pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We present three cases of DPPHRs for benign tumors, in which pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) were used. The long-term outcome of these patients was favorable; with a single case that presents a rapid onset of an acute pancreatitis, with postoperative pancreatic fistula that necessitate reoperation. The best results on early postoperative outcome were recorded in the case of pancreaticogastrostomy, with rapid onset of digestive tolerance and short period of hospital stay. These cases come in aiding modern surgery by ensuring an alternative to reintegrate the pancreatic remnant into the digestive tract after limited pancreatic head resection, with lower rates of postoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, Bertrand C, Hubert C, Janssens M, Closset J (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14(7):655–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P, Munoz-Forner E, Lopez-Ben S, Falgueras L, Sala-Palau C, Albiol M, Ortega-Serrano J, Castro-Gutierrez E (2013) Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100(12):1597–1605. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beger HG, Krautzberger W, Bittner R, Buchler M, Limmer J (1985) Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in patients with severe chronic pancreatitis. Surgery 97(4):467–473

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozawa F, Friess H, Kondo Y, Shrikhande SV, Buchler MW (2000) Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) in chronic pancreatitis: its rationale and results. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7(5):456–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340050218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beger HG, Nakao A, Mayer B, Poch B (2015) Duodenum-preserving total and partial pancreatic head resection for benign tumors—systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 15(2):167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2015.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT, Kuechler T, Binmoeller KF, Broelsch CE (1995) Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 221(4):350–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Petrucciani N, Nigri GR, Kazemi A, Muroni M, Del GM, Balesh A, Cescon M, Cucchetti A, Ravaioli M (2011) Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a collective review. Am Surg 77(3):257–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 261(5):882–887. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grendar J, Ouellet JF, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Ball CG, Dixon E (2015) In search of the best reconstructive technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy. Can J Surg 58(3):154–159. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.010014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Koninger J, Seiler CM, Wente MN, Reidel MA, Gazayakan E, Mansmann U, Muller MW, Friess H, Buchler MW (2006) Duodenum preserving pancreatectomy in chronic pancreatitis: design of a randomized controlled trial comparing two surgical techniques [ISRCTN50638764]. Trials 7:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P, Huang W, Ke NW, Hu WM, Nunes QM, Sutton R, Liu XB (2014) Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101(10):1196–1208. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beger HG, Witte C, Krautzberger W, Bittner R (1980) Experiences with duodenum-sparing pancreas head resection in chronic pancreatitis. Chirurg 51(5):303–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D, Fernandez-del CC, Warshaw AL (2004) Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 351(12):1218–1226. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra031623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crippa S, Zerbi A, Boninsegna L, Capitanio V, Partelli S, Balzano G, Pederzoli P, Di CV, Falconi M (2012) Surgical management of insulinomas: short- and long-term outcomes after enucleations and pancreatic resections. Arch Surg 147(3):261–266. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.1843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beger HG, Poch B, Vasilescu C (2014) Benign cystic neoplasm and endocrine tumours of the pancreas–when and how to operate–an overview. Int J Surg 12(6):606–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.03.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Que W, Fang H, Yan B, Li J, Guo W, Zhai W, Zhang S (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 209(6):1074–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242(6):767–771 discussion

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S, Fourtanier G, Muscari F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Radovanowic A, Fagniez PL (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189(6):720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuan CH, Tao M, Jia YM, Xiong JW, Zhang TL, Xiu DR (2014) Duodenum-preserving resection and Roux-en-Y pancreatic jejunostomy in benign pancreatic head tumors. World J Gastroenterol 20(44):16786–16792. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16786

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fatih O, Adil B, Cengiz A, Mustafa A, Sagir KA, Maras OZ, Sezai Y (2015) No mortality or pancreatic fistula after full-thickness suture pancreaticogastrostomy in 39 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int Surg 100(2):275–280. doi. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00095.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. WAUGH JM, CLAGETT OT (1946) Resection of the duodenum and head of the pancreas for carcinoma; an analysis of thirty cases. Surgery 20:224–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schlitt HJ, Schmidt U, Simunec D, Jager M, Aselmann H, Neipp M, Piso P (2002) Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy following partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 89(10):1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02202.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, Klein F, Sick O, Niedergethmann M, Wilhelm TJ, Farkas SA, Borner T, Bruns C, Kleespies A, Kleeff J, Mihaljevic AL, Uhl W, Chromik A, Fendrich V, Heeger K, Padberg W, Hecker A, Neumann UP, Junge K, Kalff JC, Glowka TR, Werner J, Knebel P, Piso P, Mayr M, Izbicki J, Vashist Y, Bronsert P, Bruckner T, Limprecht R, Diener MK, Rossion I, Wegener I, Hopt UT (2016) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 263(3):440–449. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001240

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, VonlanthenR, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Stefan Tudor or Catalin Vasilescu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Daniel Gavrila and Monica Lacatus share first authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gavrila, D., Lacatus, M., Beger, H.G. et al. Limited Parenchyma-Sparing Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Neuroendocrine Tumors and Cystic Neoplasms—the Use of Duodenum-Preserving Head Resection. Indian J Surg 82, 371–376 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-019-01971-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-019-01971-8

Keywords

Navigation