Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Outer Diameter of Appendix, C-reactive Protein, and Serum Bilirubin Levels in Complicated Versus Uncomplicated Appendicitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary objective of the present study was to compare outer diameter of the vermiform appendix on ultrasound, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and serum bilirubin in complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis. Eighty patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis clinically and with confirmation on ultrasound undergoing operative management were included for this prospective, observational study. All the patients underwent transabdominal ultrasonography for measurement of diameter of the appendix. Total serum bilirubin and hs-CRP levels were measured. The operative findings were objectively classified as a complicated appendix if perforation of the appendix, empyema or abscess formation, faecal peritonitis, and gangrenous appendix were noted. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and unpaired ‘t’ test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables respectively. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used for different cut-off points of appendicular diameter and hs-CRP. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated. Mean appendicular diameter and mean hs-CRP level were significantly higher among the patients with complicated appendicitis compared with the patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. Sensitivity was 86.1%, 94.4%, and 100.0% for appendicular diameter ≥ 7.95 mm, hs-CRP ≥ 6.60 mg/dL, and appendicular diameter ≥ 7.95 mm or hs-CRP ≥ 6.60 mg/dL respectively. Specificity was 88.6%, 90.9%, and 81.8% for appendicular diameter ≥ 7.95 mm, hs-CRP ≥ 6.60 mg/dL, and appendicular diameter ≥ 7.95 mm or hs-CRP ≥ 6.60 mg/dL respectively. Appendicular diameter and hs-CRP levels were useful to diagnose complicated appendicitis preoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prystowsky JB, Pugh CM, Nagle AP (2005) Appendicitis. Curr Probl Surg 42:694–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabiston DC, Townsend CM (2002) Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, Ahlberg G, Haapaniemi S, Neovius G, Rex L, Badume I, Granström L (2006) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 30:1033–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jamaluddin M, Hussain S, Ahmad H (2013) Hyperbilirubinaemia a predictive factor for complicated acute appendicitis: a study in a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc 63(11):1374–1378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhary P, Kumar A, Saxena N, Biswal UC (2013) Hyperbilirubinemia as a predictor of gangrenous/perforated appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann Gastroenterol 26(4):325

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Beltran MA, Mendez PE, Barrera RE, Contreras MA, Wilson CS, Cortes VJ, Cruces KS (2009) Is hyperbilirubinaemia in appendicitis a better predictor of perforation than C-reactive protein?—a prospective study. Indian Journal of Surgery 71:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harvey M (1995) Intuitive biostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kartal K, Yazıcı P, Ünlü TM, Uludağ M, Mihmanlı M (2017) How to avoid negative appendectomies: can US achieve this? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 23(2):134–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin CJ, Chen JD, Tiu CM, Chou YH, Chiang JH, Lee CH, Chang CY, Yu C (2005) Can ruptured appendicitis be detected preoperatively in the ED? Am J Emerg Med 23:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim TH, Cho BS, Jung JH, Lee MS, Jang JH, Kim CN (2015) Predictive factors to distinguish between patients with noncomplicated appendicitis and those with complicated appendicitis. Ann Coloproctol 31:192–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moon HM, Park BS, Moon DJ (2011) Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in complicated appendicitis. J Kor Soc Coloproctol 27:122–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 100:322–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Avanesov M, Wiese NJ, Karul M, Guerreiro H, Keller S, Busch P, Jacobsen F, Adam G, Yamamura J (2018) Diagnostic prediction of complicated appendicitis by combined clinical and radiological appendicitis severity index (APSI). Eur Radiol 28:3601–3610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5339-9. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giordano S, Pääkkönen M, Salminen P, Grönroos JM (2013) Elevated serum bilirubin in assessing the likelihood of perforation in acute appendicitis: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Int J Surg 11(9):795–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adams HL, Jaunoo SS (2016) Hyperbilirubinaemia in appendicitis: the diagnostic value for prediction of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42(2):249–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chambers AC, Bismohun SL, Davies H, White P, Patil AV (2015) Predictive value of abnormally raised serum bilirubin in acute appendicitis: a cohort study. Int J Surg 13:207–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nevler A, Berger Y, Rabinovitz A, Zmora O, Shabtai M, Rosin D et al (2018) Diagnostic value of serum bilirubin and liver enzyme levels in acute appendicitis. Isr Med Assoc J 20(3):176–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I (2013) Hyperbilirubinemia as a predictor for appendiceal perforation: a systematic review. Scand J Surg 102(2):55–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Phalgune.

Ethics declarations

Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. Permission was obtained from ethics committee and scientific advisory committee of the institution.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parekh, D., Jain, D., Mohite, S. et al. Comparison of Outer Diameter of Appendix, C-reactive Protein, and Serum Bilirubin Levels in Complicated Versus Uncomplicated Appendicitis. Indian J Surg 82, 314–318 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-019-01931-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-019-01931-2

Keywords

Navigation