Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurement of Depth of Premammary Fascia and Breast Parenchyma by Sonography and Histological Quantitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most surgical texts recommend the skin flap elevation in mastectomy at a plane between small and large fat lobules. However, raising a skin flap at this plane results in necrosis of skin in 10 to 15% cases. Objective of mastectomy is to remove the tumor along with entire breast parenchyma containing ducto-lobular units. Pre-mammary fascia is interposed between subcutaneous fat and breast parenchyma. Most of the terminal ducto-lobular units (TDLUs) reach superficially the plane of pre-mammary fascia. Raising a skin flap superficial to pre-mammary fascia would allow the surgeon to remove most of the breast parenchymal tissue without leaving any TDLUs under the flaps. The depth of pre-mammary fascia was measured by ultrasound in 50 patients at four spots, one in each quadrant of the breast before mastectomy. The distance between dermis and nearest TDLU was measured histologically at the same four spots in 50 mastectomy specimens. Maximum depth of pre-mammary fascia by sonography was observed in upper outer quadrant (UOQ) (mean = 1.8 cm) and minimum in lower inner quadrant (LIQ) (mean = 1.2 cm). Histologically maximum depth of TDLU was found in UOQ (mean = 1.9 cm) and the minimum depth in the LIQ (mean = 1.3 cm). There was a very strong correlation between sonographic and histologic measurements (Pearson’s rho = 0.93). This study demonstrated that ducto-lobular tissue is located deep to pre-mammary fascia. Skin flap elevation at the plane of pre-mammary fascia would ensure complete removal of breast tissue during mastectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Cancer Registry Program Indian Council of Medical Research (2005) Two-year report of the population based cancer registries 1999–2000. Bangalore, India: Incidence and Distribution of Cancer

  3. Nishimura S, Matsusue S, Koizumi S, Kashihara S (1992) Architectural distortion of subcutaneous fascial layer in breast tumors: Ultrasonographic evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol 18(10):815–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borgstein PJ, Meijer S, Pijpers RJ, Van Diest PJ (2000) Functional lymphatic anatomy for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Echoes from the past and the Periareolar blue method. Ann Surg 232(1):81–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Larson DL, Basir Z, Bruce T (2011) Is oncologic safety compatible with a predictably viable mastectomy skin flap? Plast Reconstr Surg 127(1):27–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beer GM, Varga Z, Budi S, Seifert B, Meyer VE (2002) Incidence of the superficial fascia and its relevance in skin-sparing mastectomy. Cancer 94(6):1619–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karusseit VOL, Oberholzer HM, Irsigler NG, Olorunju SAS (2014) Determination of the accuracy of juxtacapsular dissection of the breast. What is left behind? Int J Surg 12:384–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao D, Tsangaris TN, Kouprina N, Wu LSF, Balch CM, Vang R, Argani P (2008) The superficial margin of the skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: factors predicting involvement and efficacy of additional margin sampling. Ann Surg Oncol 15(5):1330–1340

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Torresan RZ, dos Santos CC, Okamura H et al (2005) Evaluation of residual tissue after skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 12(12):1037–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ho CM, Mak CKL, Lau Y, Cheung WY, Chan MCM, Hung WK (2003) Skin involvement in invasive breast carcinoma: safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 10(2):102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Handley RS (1965) The technique and results of conservative radical mastectomy (Patey’s operation). In: Ariel IM (ed) Progress in clinical cancer, vol 1. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 462–469

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roses DF, Harris MN, Gumport SL (1977) Total mastectomy with axillary dissection - a MRM. Am J Surg 134:674–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anurag Srivastava.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by institute ethics committee.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Presentation or prior publication

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Purkait, B., Srivastava, A., Kataria, K. et al. Measurement of Depth of Premammary Fascia and Breast Parenchyma by Sonography and Histological Quantitation. Indian J Surg 81, 265–270 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1791-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1791-7

Keywords

Navigation