Skip to main content
Log in

Garg Classification for Anal Fistulas: Is It Better than Existing Classifications?—a Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classifying a disease is important as it helps in categorizing the disease according to its severity and also guide the treating physician regarding the management of the disease. There are three classifications in vogue for fistula-in-ano—Parks, St James university hospital, and Standard Practice Task Force classification. These existing classifications were compared with the recently proposed Garg classification. The grading of earlier three classifications do not correlate with the severity of the disease and also does not provide any input about the management. Garg classification correlate quite well with the disease severity and also guides the surgeon regarding the management of the disease (fistulotomy can be safely done in Garg grade I-II and should never be attempted in Garg grade III-V). Thus, Garg classification should be used by surgeons and radiologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS (2000) MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics 20:623–635 discussion 635–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J 3rd, Hyman N et al (2005) Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon rectum 48:1337–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garg P (2017) Comparing existing classifications of fistula-in-ano in 440 operated patients: is it time for a new classification? Int J Surg 42:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garg P, Singh P, Kaur B (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): operative findings correlation in 229 fistula-in-ano patients. World J Surg 41:1618–1624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garg P (2017) Supralevator extrasphincteric fistula-in-ano are rare as supralevator extension is almost always in the intersphincteric plane. World J Surg 41:2409–2410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garg P, Song J, Bhatia A, Kalia H, Menon GR (2010) The efficacy of anal fistula plug in fistula-in-ano: a systematic review. Color Dis 12:965–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong KD, Kang S, Kalaskar S, Wexner SD (2014) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) to treat anal fistula: systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 18:685–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garg P, Singh P (2017) Video Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) in Cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis. Int J Surg 46:85–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garg P, Garg M (2015) PERFACT procedure: a new concept to treat highly complex anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 21:4020–4029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Garg P (2017) Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS)—a new procedure to treat high complex anal fistula. Int J Surg 40:130–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Garg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garg, P. Garg Classification for Anal Fistulas: Is It Better than Existing Classifications?—a Review. Indian J Surg 80, 606–608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1788-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1788-2

Keywords

Navigation