Indian Journal of Surgery

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 61–67 | Cite as

Efficacy of the Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers for the Reduction of Negative Appendectomy Rates

  • Fatih Mehmet Yazar
  • Aykut Urfalioglu
  • Murat Bakacak
  • Ömer Faruk Boran
  • Ertan Bülbüloğlu
Original Article
  • 128 Downloads

Abstract

Unnecessary appendectomy can cause complications; ways of reducing negative appendectomy rates (NAR) using biochemical and imaging methods are desirable. We retrospectively examined 640 patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected AA. Patients with histologically confirmed appendicitis were designated the positive appendectomy group (n = 565), whereas those with unconfirmed appendicitis were designated the negative appendectomy group (n = 75). The positive appendectomy group was subdivided into the non-perforated (n = 511) and perforated (n = 54) appendectomy groups according to pathology reports. We compared the age, sex, lymphocyte count, neutrophil percentage, pathologic positivity or negativity for appendicitis, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) of the patients. When the perforated, non-perforated, and negative appendectomy groups were compared, the highest CRP level, NLR, and PLR were evident in the perforated appendectomy group (p = 0.001), whereas the lowest neutrophil percentage was found in the non-perforated appendectomy group (p = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified neutrophil percentage, CRP value, and NLR as independent variables and demonstrated that AA could be diagnosed with 88.9 % accuracy using the cutoff values determined. In patients with suspected AA, particularly in rural areas with limited access to advanced imaging modalities, the evaluation of neutrophil percentage, CRP level, and NLR, in combination with the findings of a physical examination, may aid diagnosis and reduce NAR.

Keywords

Acute appendicitis Negative appendectomy rate Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio C-reactive protein Neutrophil percentage 

Notes

Author’s Contribution

Each author’s contribution to the manuscript: conception and design: Fatih Mehmet Yazar and Murat Bakacak; data collection: Fatih Mehmet Yazar, Murat Bakacak, and Ömer Faruk Boran; writing the article: Fatih Mehmet Yazar and Aykut Urfalioğlu; and critical revision of the article: Ertan Bülbüloğlu.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.

In this article, there was no conflict with ethical standards as no data of human beings were created and approval for this study was obtained from the institutional Medical Ethics Committee.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sandell E, Berg M, Sandblom G, Sundman J, Fränneby U, Boström L et al (2015) Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis. BMC Surg 2:15–69Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inal M, Unal B, Bilgili YK (2014) Better visualization of vermiform appendix with tissue harmonic imaging compared to conventional sonography. Iran J Radiol 11(4):e18114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergeron E, Richer B, Gharib R, Giard A (1999) Appendicitis is a place for clinical judgement. Am J Surg 177:460–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ (2005) Role of leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Am Surg 71(4):344–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tan WJ, Acharyya S, Goh YC, Chan WH, Wong WK, Ooi LL et al (2015) Prospective comparison of the Alvarado score and CT scan in the evaluation of suspected appendicitis: a proposed algorithm to guide CT use. J Am Coll Surg 220:218–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toorenvliet BR, Wiersma F, Bakker RF, Merkus JW, Breslau PJ, Hamming JF (2010) Routine ultrasound and limited computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg 34:2278–2285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahramanca S, Ozgehan G, Seker D, Gökce EI, Seker G, Tunç G et al (2014) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 20:19–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sen BB, Rifaioglu EN, Ekiz O, Inan MU, Sen T, Sen N (2014) Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a measure of systemic inflammation in psoriasis. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 33:223–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salim DK, Mutlu H, Eryilmaz MK, Salim O, Musri FY, Tural D et al (2015) Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic factor in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 3:839–842CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dirican A, Kucukzeybek BB, Alacacioglu A, Kucukzeybek Y, Erten C, Varol U et al (2015) Do the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predict prognosis in breast cancer? Int J Clin Oncol 20:70–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Unalmiser S (1995) Accuracy of serum C-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon’s clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1270–1274Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    John SK, Joseph J, Shetty SR (2011) Avoiding negative appendectomies in rural surgical practice: is C-reactive protein estimation useful as a diagnostic tool? Natl Med J India 24:144–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multi-detector row CT. Radiolog 235:879–885Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Franca Neto AH, Amorim MM, Nóbrega BM (2015) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy: literature review. Rev Assoc Med Bras 61:170–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 100:322–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hallan S, Asberg A (1997) The accuracy of C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis—a meta-analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 57:373–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ (2006) Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 76:71–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bozkurt S, Kose A, Erdogan S, Bozali GI, Ayrik C, Arpaci RB et al (2015) MPV and other inflammatory markers in diagnosing acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Assoc 65:637–641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Al-gaithy ZK (2012) Clinical value of total white blood cells and neutrophil counts in patients with suspected appendicitis: retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg 7(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-7-32 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Şahbaz NA, Bat O, Kaya B, Ulukent SC, İlkgül Ö, Özgün MY et al (2014) The clinical value of leucocyte count and neutrophil percentage in diagnosing uncomplicated (simple) appendicitis and predicting complicated appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 20:423–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anderson M, Anderson RE (2008) The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado Score. World J Surg 32:1843–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keskek M, Tez M, Yoldas O, Acar A, Akgul O, Gocmen E et al (2008) Receiver operating characteristic analysis of leukocyte counts in operations for suspected appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 26:769–772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goodman DA, Goodman CB, Monk JS (1995) Use of the neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Am Surg 61:257–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shimizu T, Ishizuka M, Kubota K (2016) A lower neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is closely associated with catarrhal appendicitis versus severe appendicitis. Surg Today Feb 46(1):84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ishizuka M, Shimizu T, Kubota K (2012) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has a close association with gangrenous appendicitis in patients undergoing appendectomy. Int Surg 97:299–304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Borissoff JI, Spronk HM, ten Cate H (2011) The hemostatic system as a modulator of atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 364:1746–1760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turkmen K, Erdur FM, Ozcicek F, Ozcicek A, Akbas EM, Ozbicer A et al (2013) Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio better predicts inflammation than neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in end-stage renal disease patients. Hemodial Int 17:391–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Atan D, İkincioğulları A, Köseoğlu S, Özcan KM, Çetin MA, Ensari S et al (2015) New predictive parameters of Bell’s palsy: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio. Balkan Med J 32:167–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Özer S, Yılmaz R, Sönmezgöz E, Karaaslan E, Taşkın S, Bütün İ et al (2015) Simple markers for subclinical inflammation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Med Sci Monit 21:298–303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    İlhan M, İlhan G, Gök AF, Bademler S, Verit Atmaca F, Ertekin C (2015) Evaluation of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and red blood cell distribution width-platelet ratio as early predictor of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29(9):1476–1480PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatih Mehmet Yazar
    • 1
  • Aykut Urfalioglu
    • 2
  • Murat Bakacak
    • 3
  • Ömer Faruk Boran
    • 2
  • Ertan Bülbüloğlu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgerySütçü Imam University School of MedicineKahramanmaraşTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology and ReanimationSütçü Imam University School of MedicineKahramanmaraşTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySütçü Imam University School of MedicineKahramanmaraşTurkey

Personalised recommendations