Indian Journal of Surgery

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 42–47 | Cite as

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-Surgeon Initial Experience

  • Mingjun Wang
  • Yunqiang Cai
  • Yongbin Li
  • Bing Peng
Original Article


Minimally invasive surgery has gained increasing acceptance over the last few years, which has expanded to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been determined to be a feasible, safe, and effective procedure in an experienced surgeon’s hands, but the adaptations to the clumsy instruments are needed. The improved dexterity of the Da Vinci robotic system provides a good opportunity to perform this challenging procedure in the minimally invasive context. The aim of this study was to share our preliminary experience of totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. From April 2015 to August 2015, four patients were selected to undergo totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. The demographic characteristics, perioperative details, and pathological results were retrospectively reviewed. One female and two male patients underwent totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, while another male patient underwent robotic total pancreatectomy due to the severe atrophy of pancreatic body and tail. The mean age of the four patients was 56.8 years. The average operation time and intraoperative blood loss were 563 min and 228 mL, respectively. No one needed blood transfusion, conversion to open pancreaticoduodenectomy, or postoperative analgesia. The postoperative courses of these patients were uneventful. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 days. No one required to be readmitted, and there was no death within 30 days following the surgery. Final pathologic examinations revealed one malignant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and three benign lesions. Based on this initial study, robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible, with acceptable oncological outcomes for highly selected patients in experienced surgeons’ hands. However, concerns such as long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness analysis, and learning curve analysis should be fully demonstrated before the popularization of this challenging procedure.


Da Vinci Pancreaticoduodenectomy Minimally invasive surgery Total pancreatectomy 



This study was funded by the West China Hospital, Sichuan University.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Mingjun Wang.

Performed the experiments: Mingjun Wang, Yunqiang Cai, Yongbin Li.

Analyzed the data: Mingjun Wang.

Wrote the paper: Mingjun Wang.

Final approval of the version to be published: Bing Peng.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo K, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260:633–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langan RC, Graham JA, Chin AB, Rubinstein AJ, Oza K, Nusbaum JA, Smirniotopoulos J, Kayser R, Jha R, Haddad N, Al-Kawas F, Carroll J, Hanna J, Parker A, Al-Refaie WB, Johnson LB (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: early favorable physical quality-of-life measures. Surgery 156:379–384Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang M, Zhang H, Wu Z, Zhang Z, Peng B (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 29:3783–3794Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song KB, Kim SC, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee DJ, Lee JW, Park KM, Lee YJ (2015) Matched case-control analysis comparing laparoscopic and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 262:146–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zeh HJ 3rd, Bartlett DL, Moser AJ (2011) Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection. Adv Surg 45:323–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strijker M, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, van Hillegersberg R, Borel Rinkes IH, Vriens MR, Molenaar IQ (2013) Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. HPB (Oxford) 15:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Secrest A, Dauoudi M, Bartlett D, Moser AJ (2012) Outcomes after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 19:864–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS (2010) Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach. Pancreas 39:160–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo S, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26:2397–2402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, Zhang X, Wang Z, Ren S, Chen XF (2011) Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot 7:131–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M, Cappelli C, Amorese G, Mosca F (2013) Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100:917–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy—a comparative study. Int J Surg 10:475–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Pugin F, Hagen ME (2010) Set-up and docking of the da Vinci surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot 6:57–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL, Gigot JF, Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic Section of the Royal Belgian Society of S, Belgian Group for Endoscopic S, Club C (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1:20–25 discussion 5-6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT (2014) Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 18:682–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang J, Wu WM, You L, Zhao YP (2013) Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1774–1780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beane JD, Pitt HA, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Howard TJ, Lillemoe KD (2011) Splenic preserving distal pancreatectomy: does vessel preservation matter? J Am Coll Surg 212:651–657 discussion 7-8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kendrick ML (2012) Laparoscopic and robotic resection for pancreatic cancer. Cancer J 18:571–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baker EH, Ross SW, Seshadri R, Swan RZ, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Martinie JB (2016) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison of complications and cost to the open approach. Int J Med Robot 12:554–560Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mingjun Wang
    • 1
  • Yunqiang Cai
    • 1
  • Yongbin Li
    • 1
  • Bing Peng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pancreatic SurgeryWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations