Indian Journal of Surgery

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 5–8 | Cite as

Laparoscopic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy (LATE) for Carcinoma of the Esophagus

  • Vageesh B G
  • Hirdaya H. Nag
  • Vaibhav Varshney
Original Article


Total laparoscopic approach for the management of carcinoma of the esophagus has not gained much popularity due to its complexity. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and outcome of laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (LATE) for patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. This retrospective study involves a total of 26 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus who were considered for LATE by a single surgical team from January 2010 to September 2014. The median (range) age was 55 years (35–72), and male to female ratio was 20:6. The median (range) operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 300 min (180–660), 300 ml (100–500), and 11.5 days (8–25), respectively. Pulmonary complications and cervical anastomotic leak (including one patient with conduit necrosis) occurred in eight (30.7 %) and three (11.5 %) patients, respectively. AJCC stage (7th ed.) was IIA in 12 (46.15 %), IIB in 10 (38.46 %), IIIA in 3 (11.53 %), and IIIB in 1 (3.84 %) patient. Surgical resection margin was negative in all but one patient (3.8 %). The median (range) number of lymph nodes (LN) retrieved was 13 (8–28). During a median follow-up 19 months (8–39), five patients (19.23 %) developed recurrence and three (11.5 %) of them died. LATE is a safe and feasible for the management of selected patients with carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus.


Esophagus Carcinoma Laparoscopy Esophagectomy Transhiatal 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. As per prevailing guidelines, permission from the ethics committee was not necessary.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 230:392–400CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, et al. (2010) The “best operation” for esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg 89:S2163–S2167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferriera EA, et al. (1995) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avital S, Zundel N, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R (2005 jul) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 190(1):69–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hulscher JBF, van Sandick J, de Boer AGEM, et al. (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011: Dec 254(6):894–906Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chu KM, Law SY, Fok M, et al. (1997) A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg 174:320–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. (2004) Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 240:962–972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rizk N, Venkatraman E, Park B, et al. (2006) American joint committee on cancer staging system. The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:1374–1381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vageesh B G
    • 1
  • Hirdaya H. Nag
    • 1
  • Vaibhav Varshney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of G I SurgeryGovind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations