Abstract
Assessment of current antibiotic prescribing patterns is an important step towards appropriate use of antimicrobial agents. This study was planned to know the surgical prophylaxis practices and the influence of educational intervention. In this educational interventional study, only clean and clean-contaminated surgeries were included. Preinterventional study was done by collecting data regarding the use of surgical prophylaxis in the Department of Surgery. After analyzing the preinterventional data, educational intervention was done. A pretest questionnaire was given to all the surgeons to assess knowledge and practice of surgical prophylaxis in our institute. The questionnaire was designed to collect information regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotic, its duration, time of administration, and prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). In our study, third-generation cephalosporin was used in maximum cases in preinterventional analysis and prophylaxis was continued for 3–5 days. Surgeon’s decision in selecting a prophylactic agent was based on information taken from departmental colleagues or drug companies. Two or more doses of antibiotic were used even when duration of surgery did not exceed more than two and half hours. Definite improvement was seen after the education where single antibiotic was used as prophylactic drug and the first dose of antibiotic was administered 30 to 60 min before incision. This shows that educational intervention makes a change in antibiotic prescribing habit. Hence, there is an urgent need for adoption of specific guidelines to ensure standardization of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis practices in hospitals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burke JP (2003) Infection control—a problem for patient safety. N Engl J Med 348:651–656
Gagliardi AR, Fenech D, Eskicioglu C, Nathens AB, McLeod R (2009) Factors influencing antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infection prevention in general surgery: a review of the literature. Can J Surg 52(6):481–489
Mangram AJ (1999) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24(4):247–278
Kanji S, Devlin JW (2005) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. In: Dipiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM (eds) Pharmacotherapy—a pathophysiologic approach, 6th edn. Mc Graw Hill, New York, pp 2217–2229
Kernodle DS, Kaiser AB (1995) Surgical and trauma-related infections. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R (eds) Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 2742–2755
Meakins J (1994) Prophylactic antibiotics. In: Meakins J (ed) Surgical infections. Diagnosis and treatment. Scientific American Inc, New York, pp 139–149
Hecker MT, Aron DC, Patel NP et al (2003) Unnecessary use of antimicrobials in hospitalized patients: current patterns of misuse with an emphasis on the antianaerobic spectrum of activity. Arch Intern Med 163:972–978
Privitera G, Scarpellini P, Ortisi G et al (1991) Prospective study of Clostridium difficile intestinal colonization and disease following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:208–210
Dettenkofer M, Forster DH, Ebner W, Gastmeier P, Ruden H, Daschner FD (2002) The practice of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in eight German hospitals. Infection 30:164–167
Kulkarni RA, Kochhar PH, Dargude VA, Rajadhyakshya SS, Thatte UM (2005) Patterns of antimicrobial use by surgeons in India. Indian J Surg 67:308–315
Rehan HS, Kakkar AK, Goel S (2010) Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Int J Infect Control 6(2):1–6
ASHP (1999) ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. American Society of Health-System Pharmacist. Am J Health Pharm 56:1839–1888
Bull AL, Russo PL, Friedman ND, Bennett NJ, Boardman CJ, Richards MJ (2006) Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis—reporting from a statewide surveillance programme in Victoria, Australia. J Hosp Infect 63:140–147
Bedouch P, Labarere J, Chirpaz E, Allenet B, Lepape A, Fourny M, Pavese P, Girardet P, Merloz P, Saragagliaa D, Calop J, Francois P (2004) Compliance with guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip replacement surgery: results of a retrospective study of 416 patients in a teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 25:302–307
Al-Azzam SI, Alzoubi KH, Mhaidat NM, Haddadin RD, Masadeh MM, Tumah HN, Magableh A, Maraqa NK (2012) Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis practice and guideline adherence in Jordan: a multi centre study in Jordanian hospitals. J Infect Dev Ctries 6(10):715–720
Hosoglu S, Sunbul M, Erol S, Altindis M, Caylan R, Demirdag K, Uemak H, Mendes H, Geyik MF, Turgut H, Gundes S, Doyuk EK, Aldemir M, Dokucu A (2003) A national survey of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in Turkey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24:758–761
Pons-Busom M, Aguas-compaired M, Delas J, Eguileor-Partearroyo B (2004) Compliance with local guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 25:308–312
Chakane M, Purandare S (2012) A single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery: our experience. Indian J Appl Res 2:2122–2123
Chandrashekhar C, Seenu V, Misra MC, Rattan A, Kapur BM, Singh R (1996) Risk factor for wound infections following cholecystectomy. Trop Gastroenterol 17(4):230–232
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This project is a part of ICMR ASPIC Programme: Antimicrobial Stewardship, Prevention and Infection Control conducted by CMC Vellore, India. Our Institute is one of the participating centers in this study.
Appendices
Annexure –I Proforma
Annexure –II Pre &Post Test Questionnaire
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nagdeo, N., Sonarkar, R., Thombare, V.R. et al. Effects of an Educational Module in Rationalizing Surgical Prophylaxis. Indian J Surg 77, 290–296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1297-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1297-5