Skip to main content

Low or Ultralow Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer Without Diverting Stoma: Experience with 28 Patients

Abstract

A diverting temporary stoma is frequently used to decrease the chance of anastomosis leakage in the middle and lower rectum cancer surgeries, but its role in preventing the leakage is still doubtful. This study has been designed to evaluate any possible anastomosis complications after a rectum resection and a low or ultralow anastomosis when no diverting stoma is applied in patients with rectal cancer. Twenty-eight patients suffering from rectal cancer were treated by a low anterior resection between the years 2005 and 2008 in Imam Reza University Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Out of the 28 patients, 6 patients had already undergone a course of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Anastomosis was performed manually in 23 patients, using a stapler in 5 of them. None of the patients had a diverting stoma. Then, the outcome was evaluated. Fecal incontinence occurred in one of the patients (6.7 %) who had already undergone a course of radiotherapy preoperatively and had a stapler used for anastomosis. No leakage was detected in any of them. The very low incidence of complications in this study, such as those not preventable by a diverting stoma, suggest a very low chance of leakage in low or ultralow anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer and in those who were treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J et al (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pucciarelli S, Toppan P, Friso ML et al (1999) Preoperative combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer does not affect early postoperative morbidity and mortality in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1276–1284

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C et al (2004) Comparison of functional results and quality of between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:832–838

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C et al (1998) Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 85:1114–1117

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW et al (1999) Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 23:463–467

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J et al (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–124

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lefebure B, Tuech JJ, Bridoux V et al (2008) Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:283–288

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P et al (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mealy K, Burke P, Hyland J (1992) Anterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: questions of safety. Br J Surg 79:305–307

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong NY, Eu KW (2005) A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2076–2079

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M et al (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6:462–469

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vlot EA, Zeebregts CJ, Gerritsen JJ et al (2005) Anterior resection of rectal cancer without bowel preparation and diverting stoma. Surg Today 35(8):629–633

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen F, Stuart M (1996) The morbidity of defunctioning stomata. ANZ J Surg 66:218–221

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2002) Prospective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 4:167–171

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Gorgun E (2006) The outcome after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:470–477

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bailey CM, Wheeler JM, Birks M et al (2003) The incidence and causes of permanent stoma after anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 5:331–334

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA et al (2005) Dutch colorectal cancer group. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R et al (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bax TW, McNevin MS (2007) The value of diverting loop ileostomy on the high-risk colon and rectal anastomosis. Am J Surg 193:585–587

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huh JW, Park YA, Sohn SK (2007) A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1040–1046

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Giuliani D, Willemsen P, Van Elst F et al (2006) A defunctioning stoma in the treatment of lower third rectal carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 106:40–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leester B, Asztalos I, Polnyib C (2002) Septic complications after low anterior rectal resection—is diverting stoma still justified? Acta Chir Iugosl 49:67–71

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanellos I, Vasiliadis K, Angelopoulos S et al (2004) Anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 1:s79–s81, 8 Suppl

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koperna T (2003) Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking. Arch Surg 138:1334–1338

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kong AP, Kim J, Holt A et al (2007) Selective treatment of rectal cancer with single-stage coloanal or ultralow colorectal anastomosis does not adversely affect morbidity and mortality. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:897–901

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SI, Sohn SK, Park YA (2007) Sphincter-preserving operations without defunctioning stoma. ANZ J Surg 77:381–384

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R et al (2005) Working Group ‘Colon/Rectum Carcinoma’. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1164–1171

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Flikier-Zelkowicz B, Codina-Cazador A, Farrés-Coll R et al (2008) Morbidity and mortality associated with diverting ileostomy closures in rectal cancer surgery. Cir Esp 84:16–19

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsunoda A, Tsunoda Y, Narita K (2008) Quality of life after low anterior resection and temporary loop ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:218–222

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kalady MF, Mantyh CR, Petrofski J et al (2008) Routine contrast imaging of low pelvic anastomosis prior to closure of defunctioning ileostomy: is it necessary? J Gastrointest Surg 12:1227–1231

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the Vice Chancellor for Research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The authors gratefully acknowledge Ms. M. Hassanpour for revising and editing the manuscript.

Funding sources

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Conflict of Interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Jangjoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soltani, E., Jangjoo, A. & Saremi, E. Low or Ultralow Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer Without Diverting Stoma: Experience with 28 Patients. Indian J Surg 77, 423–426 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0863-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0863-y

Keywords

  • Rectal cancer
  • Diverting stoma
  • Anastomosis leakage
  • Low anterior resection