Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urgent Redo-Laparotomies: Patterns and Outcome—A Single Centre Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A proportion of the operations performed in a surgical gastroenterology department are unplanned repeat laparotomies for complications of the original procedure. We examined why, in our department, these ‘redo’ laparotomies were performed and what was their outcome. We retrospectively analyzed 6530 patients operated between September 1996 - December 2010, of these 257 redo laparotomies were performed in 193(2.5 %) patients. There were 138 males and 55 females who had a mean age of 42 years (range 7–68 years). Eighty one (42 %) of the index surgeries were elective and 112 (58 %) performed in the emergency situation. Pancreas was the commonest organ for the index operation {50 (25.9 %)}, followed by the colon and rectum {45 (23.3 %)} and the small bowel {36 (18.7 %)}. Postoperative bleeding was the most common cause for re-exploration 66 (34.2 %) followed by an abscess or fluid collection that required surgical drainage 57 (29.6 %). The mortality rate after redo laparotomies was 33.2 % with sepsis and multi-organ failure being the commonest cause of death. Urgent redo-laparotomies that are performed following complicated abdominal operations have a high mortality rate. Postoperative bleeding, intrabdominal abscess and peritonitis are the commonest cause for redo-laparotomy. Multiple redolaparotomies and associated co-morbid conditions are significant predictors of mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Girgor’ev SG, Petrov VA, Grigor’eva TS (2003) Relaparotomy. Problems of terminology. Khirurgiia 6:60–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ching SS, Muralikrishnan VP, Whiteley GS (2003) Relaparotomy: a five year review of indications and outcome. Int J Clin Pract 57:333–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haluk RU, Erdinc K, Haldun K, Ahmet B, Mustafa P, Mehmet AO (2006) Urgent abdominal re-explorations. World J Emerg Surg 1:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oddeke VR, Cecilia WM, Kimberly RB et al (2007) Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 298(8):865–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Myshkin KI, Bluvshtein GA, Dodin SV (1989) Relaparotomy after operations on the rectum and colon. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 143:5–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krivitskii DI, Shuliarenko VA, Babin IA (1990) Indications for relaparotomy. Klin Khir 1:18–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tera H, Aberg C (1975) Relaparotomy. A ten-year series. Acta Chir Scand 141:637–644

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rygachev GP, Nekhaev AN, Kerez PI, Kremen VE (1997) Relaparotomy in the treatment of generalized postoperative Peritonitis. Khirurgiia 1:45–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mulier S, Penninckx F, Verwaest C, Filez L, Aerts R, Fieuws S, Lauwers P (2003) Factors affecting mortality in generalized postoperative peritonitis: multivariate analysis in 96 patients. World J Surg 27:379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mark WF, Peter A (1987) Emergency abdominal re-exploration in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mulari K, Leppaniemi A (2004) Severe secondary peritonitis following gastrointestinal tract perforation. Scand J Surg 93:204–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uggeri FR, Perego E, Franciosi C, Uggeri FA (2004) Surgical approach to the intraabdominal infections. Minerva Anestesiol 70:175–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hutchins RR, Gunning MP, Lucas DN, Allen-Mersh TG, Soni NC (2004) Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery. World J Surg 28:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holzheimer RG, Gathof B (2003) Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis – how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis. Eur J Med Res 8:125–134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zavernyi LG, Poida AI, Mel?ik VM, Bondarenko ND, Tarasov AA, Nadeev SS, Stepanik IV (1992) Prognosis in the outcome of relaparotomy. Klin Khir 8:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  16. Desiaterik VI, Krivitskii IM, Mikhno SP, Ageenko AP, Polishchuk ON, Shapovaliuk VV (2000) Relaparotomy: clinical, strategic and organizational aspects. Klin Khir 7:35–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mamchich VI, Shaprinskii VA, Palienko PK (1992) Intraabdominal hemorrhage after surgery on the abdominal organs requiring relaparotomy. Klin Khir 8:31–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellozy SH, Harris MT, Bauer JJ, Gorfine SR, Kreel I (2002) Early postoperative small-bowel obstruction: a prospective evaluation in242 consecutive abdominal operations. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1214–1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naimish Mehta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koirala, R., Mehta, N., Varma, V. et al. Urgent Redo-Laparotomies: Patterns and Outcome—A Single Centre Experience. Indian J Surg 77, 195–199 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0760-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0760-9

Keywords

Navigation