Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current Debates in Surgery – A Cross Sectional Study amongst Indian Surgeons

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgery like all fields of medicine is evolving rapidly and these new techniques are challenging to replace the existing ‘standard of care’. Though some of these advances are here to stay, many of them are driven by a handful of surgeons influenced by market forces. In some controversial topics, there is a problem of plenty and it is difficult for a general surgeon to choose from the various options available. In order to address some of these contentious issues, a cross sectional, questionnaire based study was designed. The questionnaire was posted to surgeons across the country and it included 11 questions (single best answer format) on the current debates in surgery. The questionnaire was answered by 778 surgeons and gave rise to interesting observations. The practice of surgery is an interplay of patient- surgeon and market forces and more comprehensive studies are required to address these controversial topics in surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annual report 2010 (2011) Intuitive Surgical Inc.

  2. Anonymous (2008) Nat Biotechnol 26:953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brownstein CA, Brownstein JS, Williams DS III, Wicks P, Heywood JA (2009) The power of social networking in medicine. Nat Biotechnol 27:888–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brehm BJ, Rourke KM, Cassell C (1999) Training health professionals: a multidisciplinary team approach in a university- based weight- loss program. J Allied Health 28(4):226–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sothern MS, Schumacher H, von Almen TK, Carlisle LK, Udall JN (2002) Committed to kids: an integrated, 4-level team approach to weight management in adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 102(3 Suppl):S81–S85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Connor S (2009) Single-port-access cholecystectomy: history should not be allowed to repeat. World J Surg. 33:1020–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 254:22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bignell M, Hindmarsh A, Nageswaran H, Mothe B, Jenkinson A, Mahon D, Rhodes M (2011) Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there a problem? Surg Endosc. 25:2574–2577.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Voyles CR, Hamilton BJ. Johnson WD, et al (2002) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trails favors open hernia repair with preperitoneal mesh prosthesis. Am J Surg. 184:6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bingener J, Buck L, Richards M, Michalek J, Schwensinger W, Sirinek K (2007) Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair. Arch Surg 142(6):562–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalra M, Gloviczki P (2002) Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery: who benefits? Semin Vasc Surg 15(1):39–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hitt E (2012) FDA Approves First ‘Inside the Body’ Surgical Platform. Downloaded from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/763107?src=rss on 10 May 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chintamani or Rohan Khandelwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chintamani, Khandelwal, R., Agarwal, B.B. et al. Current Debates in Surgery – A Cross Sectional Study amongst Indian Surgeons. Indian J Surg 74, 213–216 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0585-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0585-6

Keywords

Navigation