Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gossypiboma and Surgeon- Current Medicolegal Aspect – A Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gossypiboma or textiloma is referred to as a surgical gauze or towel inadvertently retained inside the body following surgery. It is an infrequent but avoidable surgical complication, which must be kept in mind in any postoperative patient who presents with pain, infection, or palpable mass. Gossypiboma, in the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, proves that the surgeon is negligent. Moreover, it has medicolegal consequences including mental agony, humiliation, huge monetary compensation and imprisonment on the part of the surgeon and increased morbidity, mortality and financial loss on the part of the patient. Here we report two cases of gossypiboma and review its current medicolegal aspect in relation to the surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IV (2006) CPJ 105 NC Bench: S G Member, P Shenoy K Ravindra Nath (Dr) And Anr. vs Vitta Veera Surya Prakasam And Ors. on 17/8/2006

  2. Stawicki SP, Evans DC, Cipolla J, Seamon MJ, Lukaszczyk JJ, Prosciak MP et al (2009) Retained surgical foreign bodies: a comprehensive review of risks and preventive strategies. Scard J Surg 98:8–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dakubo J, Clegg-Lamptey JN, Hodasi WM, Obaka HE, Toboh H, Asempa W (2009) An intra-abdominal grossypiboma. Ghana Med J 43(1):43–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Qamar SA, Jamil M, Idress T, Sobia H (2010) Retained foreign bodies after intra-abdominal surgery: a continuing problem. Prof Med J 17(2):218–222

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paramythiotis D, Michalopoulos A, Papadopoulos VN, Panagiotou D, Papaefthymiou L, et al (2011) Gossypiboma presenting as mesosigmoid abscess: an experimental study. Tech Coloproctol (Suppl 1):S67–S69

  6. Tarik U, Gokhan DM, Sunay YM, Mahmut A (2009) The medico-legal importance of gossypiboma. 4thMediterranean Academy of Forensic Science Meeting, 14–18 October 2008, Antalya-Turkey. Abstract CD of Poster Presentations:82–83

  7. Kokubo T, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Yoshikawa K, Iio M, Atomi Y (1987) Retained surgical sponges: CT and US appearance. Radiology 165:415–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fair GL (1953) Foreign bodies in abdomen causing obstruction. Am J Surg 86:472–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. William RG, Bragg RG, Nelson JA (1978) Gossypiboma—the problem of the retained surgical sponge. Radiology 129:323–326

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaiser CW, Friedman S, Spurling KP, Slowick T, Kaiser HA (1996) The retained surgical sponge. Ann Surg 224:79–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarker MM, Golam Kibria AKM, Haque MM, Sarker KP, Rahman MK (2006) Spontaneous transmural migration of a retained surgical mop into the small intestinal lumen causing sub-acute intestinal obstruction: a case report. TAJ 19(1):34–37

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta NM, Chaudhary A, Nanda V, Malik AK (1985) Retained surgical sponge after laparotomy, unusual presentation. Dis Colon Rectum 28:451–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubota A, Haniuda N et al (2000) A case of retained surgical sponge (gossypiboma) and MRI features. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 33:1719–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson KB, Levin EJ (1966) Erosion of retained surgical sponges into the intestine. AJR 96:339–343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Düx M, Ganten M, Lubienski A, Grenacher L (2002) Retained surgical sponge with migration into the duodenum and persistent duodenal fistula. Eur Radiol 12:874–877

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hyslop J, Maull K (1982) Natural history of retained surgical sponges. South Med J 75:657–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mason LB (1968) Migration of surgical sponge into small intestine. JAMA 205:122–123

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crossen HA, Crossen DF (1940) Foreign bodies left in the abdomen. CV Mosby Co, St Louis, p 49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chau WK, Lai KH, Lo KJ (1984) Sonographic findings of intra-abdominal foreign bodies due to retained gauze. Gastrointest Radiol 9:61–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheward JE, Williams AG, Mettler FA (1986) CT appearance of a surgically retained towel; (Gossypiboma). J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:343–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Naik KS, Carrington BM, Yates W, Clarke NW (2000) The post-cystectomy pseudotumour sign: MRI appearances of a modified chronic pelvic haematoma due to retained haemostatic gauze. Clin Radiol 55:970–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. National Association of Theatre Nurses (2005) Swab, instrument and needles count. In: NATN standards and recommendations for safe perioperative practice. Harrogate, pp 233–237

  23. Association of peri-Operative Registered Nurses (2007) Recommended practices for sponge, sharp, and instrument counts. In: Standards, recommended practices and guidelines. AORN Inc., Denver, CO, pp 493–502

  24. Australian College of Operating Room Nurses and Association of peri-Operative Registered Nurses (2006) Counting of accountable items used during surgery. In: Standards for perioperative nurses. ACORN, O’Halloran Hill, South Australia, pp 1–12

  25. Operating Room Nurses Association of Canada (2007) Surgical counts. In: Recommended standards, guidelines, and position statements for perioperative nursing practice. Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga

  26. South African Theatre Nurse (2007) Swab, instrument and needle counts. In: Guidelines for basic theatre procedures. Panorama, South Africa

  27. American College of Surgeons. Statement on the prevention of retained foreign bodies after surgery. http://www.facs.org/fellows_info/statements/st-51.html (accessed 5 February 2008)

  28. Berlin L (2009) Malpractice issues in radiology: res ipsa loquitur. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1475–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Agarwal BB (2009) A self-tailored hernia mesh using lightweight material: a note of caution—res ipsa loquitur. Surg Endosc 23(7):1684–1685, Epub 2009 May 23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asif Ayaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biswas, R.S., Ganguly, S., Saha, M.L. et al. Gossypiboma and Surgeon- Current Medicolegal Aspect – A Review. Indian J Surg 74, 318–322 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0446-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0446-3

Keywords

Navigation