Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anorectal Anomalies in Adults-Laparoscopic Management and Review of Literature

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the most common congenital anomalies dealt by surgeons. The reported incidence of ARMs range between 1:3,300 and 1:5,000 live births. These defects are invariably detected and treated in infancy or early childhood. There is a group of patients among these who have fistulous external opening from the rectum. These may not present in child hood and may continue to live with fecal incontinence till adult hood. One of such anomalies is rectovaginal fistulas which comprises of only 4% of all anomalies. Delayed management in such cases increases surgical and functional complications. Traditionally high and intermediate anorectal anomalies are treated by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). This involves cutting of sphincter muscles in the midline and then placement of rectum in the sphincter complex. The continence results of this operation are less than ideal. Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) has potential advantage of precise placement of the rectum inside the sphincter complex without dividing and weakening the muscles, diminished soft tissue scarring around the rectum leading to improved rectal compliance. Three adult female patients with ARMs were managed through LAARP procedure. It involves dissection around rectum, identification and ligation of fistula tract, creation of neoanus and pull through of rectum into neoanus. Results-Continence was good in all our patients which they regained after 3 to 4 days of surgery. On follow up which ranged from 6 months to 2 years all were passing well formed stools 1–2 times a day and have symmetric anal contraction with strong squeeze on digital rectal examination. Conclusion-LAARP offers an excellent option to the patients of ARM over conventional posterior sagittal anorectal approach because if its theoretical advantages of early recovery and better continence. Long term followup is needed to substantiate these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT (2000) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull through for high imperforate anus—a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 35:927–931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Raghupathy RK, Moorthy PK, Rajamani G et al (2003) Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty for high ARM. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 8:202–207

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shukla VK, Mishra A, Shukla RC et al (2004) An extremely unusual presentation of high anorectal malformation: rectovaginal fistula with sacral agenesis and uterus didelphys. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 9:151–154

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Vries PA, Pena A (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 17:638–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shandip S, Ravi PK, Ashish W et al (2008) Delayed presentation of anorectal malformations. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 13:64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith ED (1988) The bath water needs changing, but don’t throw out the baby: an overview of anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 22:335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Simmang CL, Paquette E, Tapper D et al (1997) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: primary repair of a rectovaginal fistula in an adult. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1119–1123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rintala RJ, Lindahl H (1995) Is normal bowel function possible after repair of intermediate and high anorectal malformations? J Pediatr Surg 30:491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiesewetter WB, Nixon HH (1967) Imperforate anus. Its surgical anatomy. J Pediatr Surg 2:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ymataka A, Segawa O, Yoshida R et al (2001) Laparoscopic muscle electro stimulation during laparoscopy-assisted anorectal pull through for high imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 36:1659–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lambrecht W, Lierse W (1987) The internal sphincter in anorectal malformations. Morphologic investigation in neonatal pigs. J Pediatr Surg 22:1160–1168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz LD, Zinkin LD, Stonzsifer GL et al (1978) Imperforate anus and ectopic orifices in adult patients. Dis Colon Rectum 21:633–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India

    Ripan K. Miglani, Divakar Murthy, Ravi Shanker Bhat & Kumar K. V. Ashok

  2. 67 B Tagore Nagar, Civil Lines, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141001, India

    Ripan K. Miglani

Authors
  1. Ripan K. Miglani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Divakar Murthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ravi Shanker Bhat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kumar K. V. Ashok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ripan K. Miglani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miglani, R.K., Murthy, D., Bhat, R.S. et al. Anorectal Anomalies in Adults-Laparoscopic Management and Review of Literature. Indian J Surg 74, 301–304 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-011-0394-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-011-0394-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation