Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Epidemiological Study of Major Surgical Procedures in an Urban Population of East Delhi

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgery has become an integral part of global health care, with an estimated 234 million operations performed yearly. The World Bank in 2002 reported that an estimated 164 million disability-adjusted life years, representing 11% of the entire disease burden, were attributable to surgically treatable conditions. To study the prevalence of various surgical operations undergone by individuals in their life time, in an urbanized community of Delhi. Cross-sectional study, conducted from October 2008 to April 2009 in Vivek Vihar—an urban affluent colony in Delhi. A total of 3,043 individuals residing in 622 households were interviewed as part of the study. Total number of households with some member having ever undergone surgery was 306 (49.2%). 12.3% of our study population (375 out of 3,043) had undergone one or the other form of major surgical operation in their life time. Caesarean section was found to be the most common surgical procedure performed. 61.7% surgeries were elective in nature and 81.9% were performed in a private hospital. The lifetime prevalence of surgical procedures was 1.77% among children, 12.6% among adult males and 15.8% among adult females (p < 0.001). It was observed that the expense of surgeries conducted in private hospitals was more compared to government. Our findings suggest that surgery occurs at a substantial rate, at least among the urban affluent, with most of the patients choosing to refer to a private hospital for their surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Debas HT, Gosselin R, McCord C, Thind A. Surgery. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al. (2006) Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. Disease Control Priorities Project. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank: pp 1245–1260.

  2. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran BW (2003) High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population based cross-sectional study. BJOG 110:106–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhasin SK, Rajoura OP, Sharma AK, Metha M, Gupta N, Kumar S, Joshi ID (2007) A high prevalence of caesarean section rate in East Delhi. Ind J Comm Med 32:222–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American Heart Association. What is Coronary Bypass Surgery? Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/119626671501548%20WhatIsCornryBypsSrgry_9-07.pdf (Last accessed 05 October 2010)

  6. Kumari S, Walia IJ, Singh AJ (2000) Self-reported uterine prolapse in a resettlement colony of north India. J Midwifery Womens Health 45:343–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh AJ, Arora AK (2000) Menopausal women’s profile in rural north India—an integrated qualitative and quantitative study. Adv Obstet Gynecol 52:309–313

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh AJ, Arora AK (2003) Effect of uterine prolapse on the lives of rural north Indian Women. Singapore J Obstet Gynecol 34:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singh AJ, Arora AK (2005) Profile of menopausal women in rural north India. Climacteric 8:177–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy TM, Jones RH (2000) The epidemiology of hysterectomy and irritable bowel syndrome in a UK population. Int J Clin Pract 54(10):647–650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Settnes A, Jorgensen T (1996) Hysterectomy in a Danish cohort. Prevalence, incidence and socio-demographic characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75(3):274–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ong S, Codd MB, Coughlan M, O'Herlihy C (2000) Prevalence of hysterectomy in Ireland. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 69(3):243–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schofield MJ, Hennrikus DJ, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW (1991) Prevalence and characteristics of women who have had a hysterectomy in a community survey. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 31(2):153–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sukwatana P, Meekhangwan J, Tamrongterakul T, Tanapat Y, Assavarit S, Boonjitrpimon P (1991) Menopausal symptoms among Thai women in Bangkok. Maturitas 13:217–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh A, Arora AK (2008) Why hysterectomy rate are lower in India. Ind J Comm Med 33:196–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy TM, Jones RH (2000) Epidemiology of cholecystectomy and irritable bowel syndrome in a UK population. Br J Surg 87:1658–1663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding /support source

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rupali Roy.

Additional information

Guarantor: Dr Rupali Roy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhasin, S.K., Roy, R., Agrawal, S. et al. An Epidemiological Study of Major Surgical Procedures in an Urban Population of East Delhi. Indian J Surg 73, 131–135 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0198-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0198-x

Keywords

Navigation