Abstract
Development in material engineering provide many kinds of suture materials to medical fields. The choice of utilization depends on the surgeons decision, the durability, absorbtion times, tensile strength of the suture, and operation site in means of organ and tissue. In this study we aimed to investigate 7 different suture materials in vivo and in vitro conditions to evaluate the properties and durability. Basal tensile strength (TS) values of all sutures were measured and 168 Wistar albino rats were utilised in vivo groups. The sutures were placed in the bladder, stomach, intestine and bile duct (after obstructive jaundice). Urine and bile of rat, pH 1 and pH 10 were used as in vitro conditions. Seven different suture materials (Maxon, Vicryl, Plain Catgut, Surgical Silk, Polypropylene, Caprosyn and Biosyn) were investigated in 9 different in vitro and in vivo conditions. All sutures were chosen to be in size 5/0. In the following 5th day the sutures were tested related to durability and stability. Results were compared stastically using the Mann-Whitney U test and p < 0.05 was considered as stastically significant. Among all the suture materials only polypropylene proved to preserve its stability in vivo and in vitro surveys. Cat-gut and caprosyn lost its TS in all medias. Silk and biosyn lost its TS in all conditions except the stomach and intestines. Maxon also lost its TS in all condition except urine. Utilisation of caprosyn and biosyn in urinary procedures reduces stone formation and infections. The suture of choice in biliary tract should be vicryl, maxon or biosyn since polypropylene preserves its stability that could result in stone formation. In intestinal operations polypropylene, vicryl, and silk could be preferred.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sanz LE, Patterson JA, Kamath R, Willett G, Ahmed SW, Butterfield AB (1988) Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats. Obstet Gynecol 71:418–422
Debus ES, Geiger D, Sailer M, Ederer J, Thiede A (1997) Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures. Eur Surg Res 29(1):52–61
Chu CC, Moncrief G (1983) An in vitro evaluation of the stability of mechanical properties of surgical suture materials in various pH conditions. Ann Surg 198(2):223–228
Greenberg JA, Clark RM (2009) Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2(3):146–158
Muftuoglu MA, Ozkan E, Saglam A (2004) Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials. Am J Surg 188(2):200–203
Tomihata K, Suzuki M, Ikada Y (2001) The pH dependence of monofilament sutures on hydrolytic degradation. J Biomed Mater Res 58(5):511–518
Mizuma K, Lee PC, Howard JM (1977) The disintegration of surgical sutures on exposure to pancreatic juice. Ann Surg 186(6):718–722
Vasanthan A, Satheesh K, Hoopes W, Lucaci P, Williams K, Rapley J (2009) Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study. J Periodontol 80(4):618–624
Brown RP (1992) Knotting technique and suture materials. Br J Surg 79:399–400
Greenberg CB, Davidson EB, Bellmer DD, Morton RJ, Payton ME (2004) Evaluation of the tensile strengths of four monofilament absorbable suture materials after immersion in canine urine with or without bacteria. Am J Vet Res 65(6):847–853
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karabulut, R., Sonmez, K., Turkyilmaz, Z. et al. An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Tensile Strength and Durability of Seven Suture Materials in Various pH and Different Conditions: An Experimental Study in Rats. Indian J Surg 72, 386–390 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0158-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0158-5