Skip to main content
Log in

Management of post dilatation oesophageal perforation: an experience from a tertiary centre

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 February 2009

Abstract

Background

Treatment of oesophageal perforation remains controversial. This study shows that native oesophagus should be preserved. Early recognition improves survival.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of management of post dilatation oesophageal perforation in a tertiary centre.

Methods

Between 1999 and 2007, 35 patients with oesophageal perforation following dilatation were treated. Post dilatation corrosive stricture perforations constituted the major aetiology.

Results

Twenty-four (69%) underwent early intervention (< 24 hours) and the remaining 11 (31%) were late (>24 hours). The 30-day mortality was found to be 9%, and mean hospital stay was 14 ± 14.7 days. Comparing outcomes between early and late groups, statistically significant difference was observed, with increased mortality (p=0.001) and hospital stay (p=0.001) following late intervention.

Conclusion

Early intervention decreases mortality and hospital stay in oesophageal perforation and preservation of oesophagus may be attempted, as native oesophagus is the best conduit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Attar S, Hankins JR, Suter CM et al (1990) oesophageal perforation: a Therapeutic challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 50:45–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Altorjay A, Kiss J, Voros A et al (1997) Nonoperative management of oesophageal perforations — is it justified? Ann Surg 225:415–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. David RJ (2005) Management of oesophageal perforations: the value of aggressive surgical treatment. Am J Surg 190: 161–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chau-Hsiung C, Pyng JL, Jen-Ping C et al (1992) One — stage operation for treatment after delayed diagnosis of thoracic oesophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 53:617–620

    Google Scholar 

  5. Urschel HC JR, Razzuk MA, Wood RE (1974) Improved management of oesophageal perforation: Exclusion and diversion in continuity. Ann Surg 179:587–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bufkin BL, Miller JL, Mansour KA (1996) oesophageal perforation: emphasis on management. Ann Thorac surg 61: 1447–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal S, Sikora SS, Kumar A (2004) Surgical management of corrosive strictures of stomach. Indian J Gastroenterol 23:178–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones WG, Ginsberg RJ (1992) oesophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 53:534–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. White CS, Templeton PA, Attar S (1993) oesophageal perforations: CT findings. AJR 160:767–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stephen BV, Robert RW, Martin TD (2005) oesophageal Perforation in Adults. Aggressive, Conservative Treatment Lowers Morbidity and Mortality. Ann Surg 241: 1016–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cameron JL, Kieffer RF (1979) Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic oesophageal disruptions. Ann Thorac Surg 27:404–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Iannettoni MD, Vlessis AA, Whyte RI (1997) Functional outcome after treatment of oesophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 64:1606–1610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Orringer MB, Stirling MC (1990) Esophagectomy for oesophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 49:35–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hendren WH, Henderson BM (1968) Immediate esophagectomy for instrumental perforation of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 168:192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Venki P, Rumisek JD, Chang FC (1995) Spontaneous recanalization of the oesophagus after exclusion using nonabsorbable staples. Ann Thorac Surg 59: 1214–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sinha KN (1996) Foley catheter self dilatation for strictures of the upper end of oesophagus. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 38(2):91–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiernan D, Sheridan MJ, Hettrick V, Vaughan B, Graling P (2006) Thoracic oesophageal perforation: one surgeon’s experience. Diseases of the oesophagus 19:24–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Klein AS, Zinner MJ (1988) Treatment of instrumental perforation of oesophageal malignancy by transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 123: 1016–1018

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anbalagan Amudhan.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-009-0016-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amudhan, A., Balachandar, T.G., Rajendran, S. et al. Management of post dilatation oesophageal perforation: an experience from a tertiary centre. Indian J Surg 70, 308–312 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-008-0088-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-008-0088-7

Keywords

Navigation