Skip to main content
Log in

A one year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis, in adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in co-relation to histopathology report for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Methodology

A prospective study of the patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at K.L.E.S. Hospital and M.R.C. Belgaum. The clinical, radiological and ultrasonogrpahic data of 60 patients with suspected appendicits was collected. These patients were evaluated by modified Alvarado here and ultrasonographically, which was correlated with histopatholocial finding.

Results

Out of 60 patients, 38.33% had acute appendicitis. 40% had modified Alvarado score ≥ 7 and 38.33% patients were ultrasonographically positive. In the present study, modified Alvarado score has sensitivity of 78.26%, specificity 83.78%, positive predictive value 75.00%, negative predictive value 86.11%, diagnostic accuracy 81.00% false positive error rate 16.22% and false negative error rate 21.74%. Ultrasonography had sensitivity of 82.61%, specificity of 89.19%, positive predictive value of 82.61, negative predictive value of 89.19.Diagnostic accuracy of 86.67%, false positive error rate of 10.81%, false negative error rate of 17.39%. When modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography were positive, 17 true positive cases and no false positive cases. The false negative cases in modified Alvarado score were five. When it was combined with ultrasonography the false negative cases reduced to two that is 60% reduction in false negative cases.

Conclusions

Modified Alvarado score is useful tool in clinical decision making. When compared with ultrasonography neither one is advantageous. However, additional information provided by ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO (1989) Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 76:7749

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones PF (1976) Active observation in the management of acute abdominal pain in childhood. Br J Surg ii:551–553

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denizbasi A and Unluer EE (2003) The role of the emergency medicine resident using the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the general surgery resident. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 10:296–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Puylaert JBCM (1986) Acute Appendicitis: Ultrasound sonography evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:35–60

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaffrey RB, Laing FC, Lewis FR (1987) Acute appendicitis high resolution real time ultrasound findings. Radiology 163:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kalen M, Rich AJ, Talbot DR, Canlitie WJ (1994) Evaluation of modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76: 418–419

    Google Scholar 

  7. Douglas CD, Macpherson NE, Davidson PM, Gani JS (2000) Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis incorporating the Alvarado score. Br J Surg 321:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abu-Yousef MM, Bleacher JJ, Macer J, Ordinate LF, Franked A, Metcalfe AM (1987) High resolution sonography of acute appendicitis. AJR 149:53–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yascoe ME, Jeffrey B (1994) Sonography of appendicitis and diverticulities. Radiol Clin North Am 32: 899–921

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhattacharjee PK, Chowdhary T, Roy D (2002) Prospective evaluation of modified Alvarado score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. JIMA 100(8):310–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Hashemy AM, Seleem MI (2004) Appraisal of the modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in adults. Saudi Med J 25(9):1229–1231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sooriakumaran P, Lovell D, Brown R (2005) A comparison of clinical judgment Vs the modified Alvarado score in acute appendicitis. International Journal of Surgery 3:59–52

    Google Scholar 

  13. Skaane P, Amland PF, Nordshus T, Solheim K (1990) Ultrasonography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. A prospective study. Br J Radiol 63:787–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarjan Z, Mako E, Winternitz T, Kiss I, Kalman A (1995) The value of ultrasonic diagnosis in acute appendicitis. Orv Hetil 136:713–717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ida Chan, Simon G, Bicknell Mary Graham (2005) Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting Appendicitis in a community Hospital. AJR 184: 1809–1812

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjot B. Kurane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurane, S.B., Sangolli, M.S. & Gogate, A.S. A one year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis, in adults. Indian J Surg 70, 125–129 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-008-0035-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-008-0035-7

Keywords

Navigation