Abstract
Stoichiometric analysis is a crucial step in biochemical processes because it allows us to find the proportions in which the substrates and products react. A system of algebraic equation is obtained from an elemental balance of the participating substances and determined, overdetermined or underdetermined systems can result depending on the number of substances and elements. Underdetermined systems are the most common ones as there are, generally, more substances than elemental balances. However, such systems have been poorly studied and a straightforward way to establish the solution space has not yet been reported. In this work a novel approach for finding all the possible solutions to such underdetermined systems is reported for the first time. The solutions space is expressed as a set of vectors which are here referred as extreme stoichiometries. To illustrate the general applicability and some uses of the proposed approach, three different fermentation systems are analyzed: growth of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a mixed culture for hydrogen production, and the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It is shown how the full stoichiometric spaces can be calculated for heterotrophy, autotrophy, mixotrophy, growth of mixed cultures in mixed substrates and how the experimental results should be contained in such spaces, what permits a consistency analysis. With the proposed method, it is now possible to estimate the maximum yields for any given microbial growth reaction and to assess the congruence of experimental data, even when the system is underdetermined.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
24 December 2022
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-022-1111-8
References
Hoover, S. R. and F. E. Allison (1940) The growth metabolism of Rhizobium, with evidence on the interrelations between respiration and synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 134: 181–192.
Monod, J. (1949) The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 3: 371–394.
Roels, J. A. (1980) Application of macroscopic principles to microbial metabolism. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22: 2457–2514.
Heijnen, J. J. (1981) Application of the macroscopic electric charge balance in fermentation modeling. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23: 1133–1144.
Wang, N. S. and G. Stephanopoulos (1983) Application of macroscopic balances to the identification of gross measurement errors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25: 2177–2208.
Xie, L. and D. I. C. Wang (1994) Stoichiometric analysis of animal cell growth and its application in medium design. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43: 1164–1174.
Ooijkaas, L. P., R. M. Buitelaar, J. Tramper, and A. Rinzema (2000) Growth and sporulation stoichiometry and kinetics of Coniothyrium minitans on agar media. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 69: 292–300.
Thorne, L. R. (2010) An innovative approach to balancing chemical-reaction equations: a simplified matrix-inversion technique for determining the matrix null space. Chem. Educ. 15: 304–308.
Chuang, J.-C. (2011) Convex geometry and stoichiometry. arXiv:1106.3773. 1–34.
Akinola, R. O., S. Y. Kutchin, I. A. Nyam, and O. Adeyanju (2016) Using row reduced echelon form in balancing chemical equations. Adv. Linear Algebra Matrix Theory. 6: 146–157.
Chowdhury, A. and C. D. Maranas (2015) Designing overall stoichiometric conversions and intervening metabolic reactions. Sci. Rep. 5: 16009.
Schuster, S. and C. Hilgetag (1994) On elementary flux modes in biochemical reaction systems at steady state. J. Biol. Syst. 2: 165–182.
Beckers, V., I. Poblete-Castro, J. Tomasch, and C. Wittmann (2016) Integrated analysis of gene expression and metabolic fluxes in PHA-producing Pseudomonas putida grown on glycerol. Microb. Cell Fact. 15: 73.
Dash, S., D. G. Olson, S. H. Joshua Chan, D. Amador-Noguez, L. R. Lynd, and C. D. Maranas (2019) Thermodynamic analysis of the pathway for ethanol production from cellobiose in Clostridium thermocellum. Metab. Eng. 55: 161–169.
Mendonça, T. T., J. G. C. Gomez, E. Buffoni, R. J. Sánchez Rodriguez, J. Schripsema, M. S. G. Lopes, and L. F. Silva (2014) Exploring the potential of Burkholderia sacchari to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 116: 815–829.
Noorman, H. J., J. J. Heijnen, and K. C. A. M. Luyben (1991) Linear relations in microbial reaction systems: a general overview of their origin, form, and use. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38: 603–618.
Clarke, B. L. (1981) Complete set of steady states for the general stoichiometric dynamical system. J. Chem. Phys. 75: 4970.
Schuster, S., C. Hilgetag, J. H. Woods, and D. A. Fell (2002) Reaction routes in biochemical reaction systems: algebraic properties, validated calculation procedure and example from nucleotide metabolism. J. Math. Biol. 45: 153–181.
Wagner, C. (2004) Nullspace approach to determine the elementary modes of chemical reaction systems. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108: 2425–2431.
Zamorano, F., A. V. Wouwer, and G. Bastin (2010) A detailed metabolic flux analysis of an underdetermined network of CHO cells. J. Biotechnol. 150: 497–508.
Urbanczik, R. and C. Wagner (2005) An improved algorithm for stoichiometric network analysis: theory and applications. Bioinformatics. 21: 1203–1210.
von Kamp, A., S. Thiele, O. Hädicke, and S. Klamt (2017) Use of CellNetAnalyzer in biotechnology and metabolic engineering. J. Biotechnol. 261: 221–228.
Mavrovouniotis, M. L. (1991) Estimation of standard Gibbs energy changes of biotransformations. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 14440–14445.
Alberty, R. A. (1998) Calculation of standard transformed Gibbs energies and standard transformed enthalpies of biochemical reactants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 353: 116–130.
Popovic, M. (2019) Thermodynamic properties of microorganisms: determination and analysis of enthalpy, entropy, and Gibbs free energy of biomass, cells and colonies of 32 microorganism species. Heliyon. 5: e01950.
Vuppaladadiyam, A. K., P. Prinsen, A. Raheem, R. Luque, and M. Zhao (2018) Microalgae cultivation and metabolites production: a comprehensive review. Biofuel. Bioprod. Biorefin. 12: 304–324.
Boyle, N. R. and J. A. Morgan (2009) Flux balance analysis of primary metabolism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. BMC Syst. Biol. 3: 4.
Schwartz, E. and B. Friedrich (2006) The H2-metabolizing prokaryotes. pp. 496–563. In: [M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K.-H. Schleifer, and E. Stackebrandt (eds.). The Prokaryotes. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
Kleerebezem, R. and M. C. van Loosdrecht (2007) Mixed culture biotechnology for bioenergy production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18: 207–212.
García-Depraect, O., R. Castro-Muñoz, R. Muñoz, E. R. Rene, E. León-Becerril, I. Valdez-Vazquez, G. Kumar, L. C. Reyes-Alvarado, L. J. Martínez-Mendoza, J. Carrillo-Reyes, and G. Buitrón (2021) A review on the factors influencing biohydrogen production from lactate: the key to unlocking enhanced dark fermentative processes. Bioresour. Technol. 324: 124595.
Esquivel-Elizondo, S., I. Chairez, E. Salgado, J. S. Aranda, G. Baquerizo, and E. I. Garcia-Peña (2014) Controlled continuous bio-hydrogen production using different biogas release strategies. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 173: 1737–1751.
Gomez-Romero, J., I. Garcia-Peña, J. Ramirez-Muñoz, and L. G. Torres (2014) Rheological characterization of a mixed fruit/vegetable puree feedstock for hydrogen production by dark fermentation. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 4: 81–88.
Niño-Navarro, C., I. Chairez, P. Christen, M. Canul-Chan, and E. I. García-Peña (2020) Enhanced hydrogen production by a sequential dark and photo fermentation process: effects of initial feedstock composition, dilution and microbial population. Renew. Energy. 147: 924–936.
Matsumoto, M. and Y. Nishimura (2007) Hydrogen production by fermentation using acetic acid and lactic acid. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 103: 236–241.
Detman, A., D. Mielecki, A. Chojnacka, A. Salamon, M. K. Błaszczyk, and A. Sikora (2019) Cell factories converting lactate and acetate to butyrate: Clostridium butyricum and microbial communities from dark fermentation bioreactors. Microb. Cell Fact. 18: 36.
Kargi, F., N. S. Eren, and S. Ozmihci (2012) Bio-hydrogen production from cheese whey powder (CWP) solution: comparison of thermophilic and mesophilic dark fermentations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 37: 8338–8342.
Gonzalez-Garcia, R. A., R. Aispuro-Castro, E. Salgado-Manjarrez, J. Aranda-Barradas, and E. I. Garcia-Peña (2017) Metabolic pathway and flux analysis of H2 production by an anaerobic mixed culture. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 42: 4069–4082.
Dashko, S., N. Zhou, C. Compagno, and J. Piškur (2014) Why, when, and how did yeast evolve alcoholic fermentation? FEMS Yeast Res. 14: 826–832.
Kutyna, D. R., C. Varela, P. A. Henschke, P. J. Chambers, and G. A. Stanley (2010) Microbiological approaches to lowering ethanol concentration in wine. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 21: 293–302.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge to the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) for the partial financial support (Grant No. 682137) and the full PhD scholarship (CVU 867318).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HGRE: conceptualization, programming and calculation performance, applications of the method and algorithm, analysis of results, manuscript writing. ABJS: analysis of theoretical aspects, contributions on data consistency and metabolic aspects of S. cerevisiae, manuscript reviewing and correction. BCA: analysis of results, metabolic aspects of C. reinhardtii, proof correcting. GPEI: analysis of results, metabolic aspects on biohydrogen production, proof correcting SME: conceptualization, algorithmic adaptation and programming, analysis of results, manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Neither ethical approval nor informed consent was required for this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hernández-Guisao, R.E., Aranda-Barradas, J.S., Badillo-Corona, A. et al. Calculation of All Possible Stoichiometric Coefficients and Theoretical Yields of Microbial Global Reactions. Biotechnol Bioproc E 27, 797–809 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-022-0061-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-022-0061-5