Abstract
The increasing demand of biochemical supply for various industries has spurred the development of metabolic engineering to find the optimal design of the microbial cell factories. Traditional method of chemical synthesis using the natural producer leads to the production far below their theoretical maximums. Gene knockout strategy is then introduced to improve the metabolite production. To aid the process, many computational algorithms have been developed to design the optimal microbial strain as cell factories to increase the production of the desired metabolite. However, due to the size of the genome scale model of the microbial strain, finding the optimal combination of genes to be knocked out is not an easy task. In this paper, we propose a hybrid of Genetic Ant Colony Optimization (GACO) and Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) namely GACOFBA to find the optimal gene knockout that increase the production of the target metabolite. Using E. coli and S. cerevisiae genome scale model, we test our proposed hybrid algorithm to increase the production of four different metabolites. By comparing with the results from existing method OptKnock as well as the conventional Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), the results show that our proposed hybrid algorithm able to identify the best set of genes and increase the production while maintaining the optimal growth rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Joyce, A. R., B. Ø. Palsson, P. Fu, and S. Panke (2009) In silico genome-scale metabolic models: The constraint-based approach and its application. pp. 193–233. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Song, B., E. Buyuktahtakin, N. Bandyopadhyay, S. Ranka, and T. Kahveci (2011) Identifying enzyme knockout strategies on multiple enzyme associations. Bioinformatics — Trends and Methodol. 162: 353–370.
Mahadevan, R., A. P. Burgard, I. Famili, S. V. Dien, and H. S. Christophe (2005) Applications of metabolic modeling to drive bioprocess development for the production of value-added chemicals. Biotechnol. Bioproc. Eng. 10: 408–417.
Price, N. D., J. A. Papin, C. H. Schilling, and B. O. Palsson (2003) Genome-scale microbial in silico models: The constraints-based approach. Trends Biotechnol. 21: 162–169.
Park, J. M., T. Y. Kim, and S. Y. Lee (2009) Constraints-based genome-scale metabolic simulation for systems metabolic engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 27: 978–988.
Orth, J. D., I. Thiele, and B. Ø. Palsson (2010) What is flux balance analysis? Nat. Computat. Biol. 28: 245–248.
Reed, J. L. and B. O. Palsson (2003) Thirteen years of building constraint-based in silico models of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 185: 2692–2699.
Burgard, A. P., P. Pharkya and C. D. Maranas (2003) Optknock: A bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 84: 647–657.
Holland, J. H. (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Dorigo, M., V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni (1996) Ant System: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part B 26: 29–41.
Pham, D. T., A. Ghanbarzadeh, E. Koç, S. Otri, S. Rahim, and M. Zaidi (2006) The bees algorithm — A novel tool for complex optimisation problems. pp. 454–461. Proceedings of IPROMS 2006 Conference. July 3–14. Cardiff, UK.
Patil, K. R., I. Rocha, J. Forster, and J. Nielsen (2005) Evolutionary programming as a platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Bioinform. 6: 308.
Hwang, S. F. and R. S. He (2006) A hybrid real-parameter genetic algorithm for function optimization. Adv. Eng. Inform. 20: 7–21.
Xue, X. D., X. D. Cheng, B. Xu, H. L. Wang, and C. P. Jiang (2010) The basic principle and application of ant colony optimization algorithm. pp. 358–360. Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE) International Conference. Oct 29–30. Hangzhou, China.
Kauffman, K. J., P. Prakash, and J. S. Edward (2003) Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr. Opinion Biotechnol. 14: 491–496.
Varma, A. and B. O. Palsson (1994) Metabolic flux balancing: Basic concept, scientific and practical use. Bio/Technol. 12: 994–998.
Nemati, S., M. E. Basiri, N. Ghasem-Aghaee, and M. H. Aghdam (2009) A novel ACO–GA hybrid algorithm for feature selection in protein function prediction. Expert. Syst. Applicat. 36: 12086–12094.
Feist, A. M., C. S. Henry, J. L. Reed, M. Krummenacker, A. R. Joyce, P. D. Karp, L. J. Broadbelt, V. Hatzimanikatis, and B. Ø. Palsson (2007) A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3: 121.
Mo, M. L., B. Ø. Palsson, and M. J. Herrgård (2009) Connecting extracellular metabolomic measurements to intracellular flux states in yeast. BMC Syst. Biol. 3: 37.
Schellenberger, J., R. Que, R. M. Fleming, I. Thiele, J. D. Orth, A. M. Feist, D. C. Zielinski, A. Bordbar, N. E. Lewis, S. Rahmanian, J. Kang, D. R. Hyduke, and B. Ø. Palsson (2011) Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: The COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat. Protoc. 6: 1290–1307.
Suman, M., J. Clomburg, and R. Gonzalez (2010) Escherichia coli strains engineered for homofermentative production of d-lactic acid from glycerol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76: 4237–4336.
Zhu, J. and K. Shimizu (2005) Effect of a single-gene knockout on the metabolic regulation in Escherichia coli for D-lactate production under microaerobic condition. Metab. Eng. 7: 104–115.
Yang, Y., G. N. Benett, and K. San (1999) Effect of inactivation of nuo and ackA-pta on redistribution of metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 65: 291–297.
Zhao, J., T. Baba, H. Mori, and K. Shimizu (2004) Effect of zwf gene knockout on the metabolism of Escherichia coli grown on glucose or acetate. Metab. Eng. 6: 164–174.
Arikawa, Y., T. Kuroyanagi, M. Shimosake, H. Muratsubaki, K. Enomoto, R. Kodaira, and M. Okazaki (1999) Effect of gene disruptions of the TCA cycle on production of succinic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 87: 28–26.
Park, S., P. Cotter, and R. P. Gunsalus (1995) Regulation of malate dehydrogenase (mdh) gene expression in Escherichia coli in response to oxygen, carbon, and heme availability. J. Bacteriol. 177: 6652–6656.
Zimenkov, D., A. Gulevich, A. Skorokhodova, I. Biriukova, Y. Kozlov, and S. Mashko (2005) Escherichia Coli ORF ybhE is pgl gene encoding 6-phosphogluconolactonase (EC 3.1.1.31) that has no homology with known 6PGLs from other organisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 244: 275–280.
Richard, J. D., L. Eshantha, J. Salgado, and J. E. Hewlins (2002) The catabolism of amino acid to long chain and complex alcohols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 8028–8034.
Leskovac, V., S. Triviæ, and D. Perièin (2002) The three zinccontaining alcohol dehydrgenase from baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2: 481–494.
Lee, S. J., D. Lee, T. Y. Kim, B. H. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Y. Lee (2005) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for enhanced production of succinic acid, based on genome comparison and In Silico gene knockout simulation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 7880–7887.
Cotter, P. A., V. Chepuri, R. B. Gennis, and R. P. Gunsalus (1990) Cytochrome o(cyoABCD) and d (cydAB) oxidase gene expression in Escherichia coli is regulated by oxygen, pH, and the fnr gene product. J. Bacteriol. 172: 6333–6338.
Janausch, I. G., O. B. Kim, and G. Unden (2001) DctA-and Dcuindependent transport of succinate in Escherichia coli: Contribution of diffusion and of alternative carriers. Arch. Microbiol. 176: 224–230.
Compos-Bermudez, V. A., F. P. Bologna, C. S. Andreo, and M. F. Drincovich (2010) Functional dissection of Escherichia coli phosphotransacetylase structural domains and analysis of key compounds involved in activity regulation. FEBS J. 277: 1957–1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salleh, A.H.M., Mohamad, M.S., Deris, S. et al. Gene knockout identification for metabolite production improvement using a hybrid of genetic ant colony optimization and flux balance analysis. Biotechnol Bioproc E 20, 685–693 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-015-0276-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-015-0276-9