Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing in CHO cells via high-level sgRNA-Cas9 complex
- 494 Downloads
Increasing demand for recombinant therapeutic proteins has warranted the need for an efficient host cell to produce high-quality proteins, with a high yield. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells appear to meet this demand, and their genetic tailoring will facilitate improvements in their productivity for recombinant proteins. Recent advances in programmable RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease (RGN) have facilitated CHO cell engineering via site-specific genome editing. One critical determinant for increasing genomeediting efficiency is attaining a balanced expression level of Cas9 nuclease and guide RNAs in the nucleus. Here, we achieved high-level expression of Cas9 nuclease and single guide RNA (sgRNA), enhancing expression levels approximately three-fold over the conventional methodology by using an iterative transfection approach. We demonstrated that high abundance of sgRNA and Cas9 nuclease induced a two-fold increase in the site-specific mutation rate on average for both single and multiple genetic targets. Sequencing results confirmed frame-shift mutations at targeted genomic loci created by error-prone NHEJassociated mutations. Moreover, we controlled the amount of sgRNA-Cas9 complex formation in vitro and delivered the complex directly to cells, resulting in the maximization of mutation frequency by the high-level of sgRNA-Cas9 complex. Importantly, mutation rates of putative off-target sites remained minimal in spite of the improved genome-editing efficiency. These results provide an efficient strategy for editing the CHO genome with the reduction of the time-consuming screening efforts aimed at isolating clones with desirable properties.
Keywordsgenome editing CRISPR/Cas9 Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells iterative transfection
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Steentoft, C., Vakhrushev, S. Y., Vester-Christensen, M. B., Schjoldager, K. T., Kong, Y., Bennett, E. P., U. Mandel, H. Wandall, S. B. Levery, and H. Clausen (2011) Mining the O-glycoproteome using zinc-finger nuclease-glycoengineered SimpleCell lines. Nat. Methods. 8: 977–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Meuris, L., F. Santens, G. Elson, N. Festjens, M. Boone, A. Dos Santos, S. Devos, F. Rousseau, E. Plets, E. Houthuys, P. Malinge, G. Magistrelli, L. Cons, L. Chatel, B. Devreese, and N. Callewaert (2014) GlycoDelete engineering of mammalian cells simplifies N-glycosylation of recombinant proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 32: 485–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Xu, X., H. Nagarajan, N. E. Lewis, S. Pan, Z. Cai, X. Liu, W. Chen, M. Xie, W. Wang, S. Hammond, M.R. Andersen, N. Neff, B. Passarelli, W. Koh, H. C. Fan, J. Wang, Y. Gui, K. H. Lee, M. J. Betenbaugh, S. R. Quake, I. Famili, B. O. Palsson, and J. Wang (2011) The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line. Nat. Biotechnol. 29: 735–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lewis, N. E., X. Liu, Y. Li, H. Nagarajan, G. Yerganian, E. O’Brien, A. Bordbar, A. M. Roth, J. Rosenbloom, C. Bian, M. Xie, W. Chen, N. Li, D. Baycin-Hizal, H. Latif, J. Forster, M. J. Betenbaugh, I. Famili, X. Xu, J. Wang, and B. O. Palsson (2013) Genomic landscapes of Chinese hamster ovary cell lines as revealed by the Cricetulus griseus draft genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 759–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Sealover, N. R., A. M. Davis, J. K. Brooks, H. J. George, K. J. Kayser, and N. Lin (2013) Engineering Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells for producing recombinant proteins with simple glycoforms by zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN)-mediated gene knockout of mannosyl (alpha-1,3-)-glycoprotein beta-1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (Mgat1). J. Biotechnol. 167: 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Carlson, D. F., S. C. Fahrenkrug, and P. B. Hackett (2012) Targeting DNA With Fingers and TALENs. Mol. Ther. Nucleic acids. 1: e3.Google Scholar
- 18.Duda, K., L. A. Lonowski, M. Kofoed-Nielsen, A. Ibarra, C. M. Delay, Q. Kang, Z. Yang, S. M. Pruett-Miller, E. P. Bennett, H. H. Wandall, G. D. Davis, S. H. Hansen, and M. Frodin (2014) Highefficiency genome editing via 2A-coupled co-expression of fluorescent proteins and zinc finger nucleases or CRISPR/Cas9 nickase pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: e84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ghorbaniaghdam, A., J. Chen, O. Henry, and M. Jolicoeur (2014) Analyzing clonal variation of monoclonal antibody-producing CHO cell lines using an in silico metabolomic platform. PloS One. 9: e90832.Google Scholar
- 22.Santiago, Y., E. Chan, P. Q. Liu, S. Orlando, L. Zhang, F. D. Urnov, M. C. Holmes, D. Guschin, A. Waite, J. C. Miller, E. J. Rebar, P. D. Gregory, A. Klug, and T. N. Collingwood (2008) Targeted gene knockout in mammalian cells by using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 5809–5814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Zuris, J. A., D. B. Thompson, Y. Shu, J. P. Guilinger, J. L. Bessen, J. H. Hu, M. L. Maeder, J. K. Joung, Z. Y. Chen, and D. R. Liu (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33: 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Sakuma, T., A. Nishikawa, S. Kume, K. Chayama, and T. Yamamoto (2014) Multiplex genome engineering in human cells using all-in-one CRISPR/Cas9 vector system. Sci. Rep. 4: 5400.Google Scholar