Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a microbial consortium for dairy wastewater treatment

Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wastewater from the dairy industries usually contains high concentrations of contaminants and, since the volume generated is also high, the total contaminant load is very significant. Among the available options for treatment, biological degradation looks like the most promising one. Furthermore, the supplementation of the native microbial populations with external microorganisms with high specific degradation rates (bio-augmentation) has demonstrated to improve the performance of treatment. The main objective of this research was to select a combination of bacteria to improve the aerobic treatment of dairy processing wastewater. For this purpose, eleven fat/protein-degrading microorganisms belonging to the genera Bacillus, Serratia, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Stenotrophomonas, Klebsiella and Escherichia, were evaluated as potential degrading bacteria using a Plackett-Burman design. Assays were carried out to select the strains that most significantly influenced the degradation of wastewater and biomass yield, in terms of COD removal. A simulated dairy industry effluent was used as culture medium. Four strains were selected as potential members of the microbial consortium: Lactococcus garvieae, Bacillus thuringiensis, Escherichia coli and Stenotrophomonas sp. The optimal operation temperature and pH range of the selected consortium were 32°C and 6 ∼ 8, respectively. The degradation percentages reached with the selected consortium were 80.67 and 83.44% at 24 and 48 h, respectively. The selected consortium significantly improved the degradation of the dairy wastewater, and the degradation degree achieved by this consortium was higher than by using the strains individually.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kushwaha, J. P., V. C. Srivastava, and I. D. Mall (2010) Treatment of dairy wastewater by commercial activated carbon and bagasse fly ash: Parametric, kinetic and equilibrium modelling, disposal studies. Bioresour. Technol. 101: 3474–3483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodriguez, R. (2010) Caracterización y tratamiento de efluentes líquidos en la industria láctea. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Industrial (INTI). Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lobo Poblet, M. S. (2009) Aspectos ambientales, sociales y económicos de la industria láctea. Unidad de Medio Ambiente — Secretaría de Industria, Comercio y PyME., Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Omil, F., J. M. Garrido, B. Arrojo, and R. Méndez (2003) Anaerobic filter reactor performance for the treatment of complex dairy wastewater at industrial scale. Water Res. 37: 4099–4108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kushwaha, J. P., V. C. Srivastava, and I. D. Mall (2011) An overview of various technologies for the treatment of dairy wastewaters. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 51: 442–452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Britz, T. J., C. van Schalkwyk, and Y. T. Hung (2005) Treatment of dairy processing wastewaters. In: L. K. Wang, Y. T. Hung, H. H. Lo, and C. Yapijakis (eds.). Waste treatment in the food processing industry. CRC Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Komatsu, T., K. Hanaki, and T. Matsuo (1991) Prevention of lipid inhibition in anaerobic processes by introducing a two-phase system. Water Sci. Technol. 23: 1189–1200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Loperena, L., M. D. Ferrari, A. L. Díaz, G. N. Ingold, L. V. N. Pérez, F. Carvallo, D. Travers, R. J. Menes, and C. Lareo (2009) Isolation and selection of native microorganisms for the aerobic treatment of simulated dairy wastewaters. Bioresour. Technol. 100: 1762–1766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Masse, L., K. J. Kennedy, and S. Chou (2001) The effect of an enzymatic pretreatment on the hydrolysis and size reduction on fat particles in slaughterhouse wastewater. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76: 629–635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer, A. C., C. J. van der Gast, and I. P. Thompson (2005) Perspectives and vision for strain selection in bioaugmentation. Trends Biotechnol. 23: 74–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhall, P., R. Kumar, and A. Kumar (2012) Biodegradation of sewage wastewater using autochthonous bacteria. Sci. World J. 2012: ID 861903.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brenner, K., L. You, and F. H. Arnold (2008) Engineering microbial consortia: A new frontier in synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol. 26: 483–489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Durruty, I., E. Okada, J. F. González, and S. Murialdo (2011) Multisubstrate monod kinetic model for simultaneous degradation of chlorophenol mixtures. Biotechnol. Bioproc. Eng. 16: 908–915.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, Z. and W. W. Mohn (2002) Bioaugmentation with the resin acid-degrading bacterium Zoogloea resiniphila DhA-35 to counteract pH stress in an aerated lagoon treating pulp and paper mill effluent. Water Res. 36: 2793–2801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Salem, S. R., M. S. A. Shabeb, and A. A. Amara (2009) Optimization of thermophilic protease production in Bacillus mixed cultures under mesophilic conditions. World J. Agric. Sci. 5: 375–383.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Navarrete-Bolaños, J. L., H. Jiménez-Islas, E. Botello-Alvarez, and R. Rico-Martínez (2003) Mixed culture optimization for marigold flower ensilage via experimental design and response surface methodology. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51: 2206–2211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Agüero, M. V., C. E. Kotlar, and S. I. Roura (2011) METHODS: Simultaneous optimization of biomass and protease biosynthesis by a local isolated Pseudomonas sp. — Selection of main medium components and operating conditions. Ind. Biotechnol. 7: 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajendran, A., A. Palanisamy, and V. Thangavelu (2008) Evaluation of medium components by Plackett-burman statistical design for lipase production by candida rugosa and kinetic modeling. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 24: 436–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazzucotelli, C. A., A. G. Ponce, C. E. Kotlar, and M. R. Moreira (2013) Isolation and characterization of bacterial strains with a hydrolytic profile with potential use in bioconversion of agroindustial by-products and wastes. Food Sci. Technol. (Campinas). 33: 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dhandhukia, P. C. and V. R. Thakkar (2007) Significant medium components for enhanced jasmonic acid production by Lasiodiplodia theobromae using Plackett-Burman Design. Curr. Trends Biotechnol. Pharm. 1: 79–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chandrashekar, K., P. A. Felse, and T. Panda (1999) Optimization of temperature and initial pH and kinetic analysis of tartaric acid production by Gluconobacter suboxydans. Bioproc. Eng. 20: 203–207.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. APHA (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed., American Public Health Association/ American water works Association/Water environment federation. Washington D. C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Contreras, E. M., N. C. Bertola, L. Gianuzzi, and N. E. Zaritzky (2002) A modified method to determine biomass concentration as COD in pure cultures and in activated sludge systems. Water SA. 28: 463–467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan, Y. J., M. F. Chong, C. L. Law, and D. G. Hassell (2009) A review on anaerobic-aerobic treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 155: 1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuddus, M. and P. W. Ramteke (2011) Production optimization of an extracellular cold-active alkaline protease from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia MTCC 7528 and its application in detergent industry. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5: 809–816.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tenorio-Sánchez, S. A., N. G. Rojas-Avelizapa, J. E. Ibarra, L. I. Rojas Avelizapa, and R. Cruz-Camarillo (2010) Characterization of a Bacillus thuringiensis strain isolated from a highly polychlorinated biphenyls contaminated soil. Tecnólog@.3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Travassos, L. H., M. N. Pinheiro, F. S. Coelho, J. L. M. Sampaio, V. L. C. Merquior, and E. A. Marques (2004) Phenotypic properties, drug susceptibility and genetic relatedness of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical strains from seven hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J. Appl. Microb. 96: 1143–1150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vandecasteele, F. P. J., T. F. Hess, and R. L. Crawford (2003) Constructing efficient microbial consortia using a genetic algorithm. Genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO, 2003). July 12–16. Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huban, C. M. and R. D. Plowman (1997) Bioaugmentation: Put microbes to work. Chem. Eng. Mag. 104: 74–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kosseva, M. R., C. A. Kent, and D. R. Lloyd (2003) Thermophilic bioremediation strategies for a dairy waste. Biochem. Eng. J. 15: 125–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schneider, I. D. and Y. I. Topalova (2011) Effect of bioaugmentation on anaerobic wastewater treatment in the dairy industry. J. Dairy Sci. 94: 4389–4397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Becker, P., D. Köster, M. N. Popov, S. Markossian, G. Antranikian, and H. Märkl (1999) The biodegradation of olive oil and the treatment of lipid-rich wool scouring wastewater under aerobic thermophilic conditions. Water Res. 33: 653–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Carta-Escobar, F., J. Pereda-Marín, P. Álvarez-Mateos, F. Romero-Guzmán, and M. M. Durán Barrantes (2005) Aerobic purification of dairy wastewater in continuous regime: Part II: Kinetic study of the organic matter removal in two reactor configurations. Biochem. Eng. J. 22: 117–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaewsuk, J., W. Thorasampan, M. Thanuttamavong, and G. T. Seo (2010) Kinetic development and evaluation of membrane sequencing batch reactor (MSBR) with mixed cultures photosynthetic bacteria for dairy wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Manag. 91: 1161–1168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Durruty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzucotelli, C.A., Durruty, I., Kotlar, C.E. et al. Development of a microbial consortium for dairy wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Bioproc E 19, 221–230 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-013-0517-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-013-0517-8

Keywords

Navigation