Summary
For patients suffering from localized and advanced stage esophageal cancer, long-term outcomes remain poor. However, as already seen in other tumors, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to practice-changing results in the treatment of esophageal cancer. In this short review, five emerging studies are presented and discussed, which have changed standard of care in this disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cited Literature
Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.
International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO. Globocan. China. 2020.
Arnold M, et al. Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018. Gut. 2020;69(9):1564–71.
Hou H, et al. Survival of esophageal cancer in China: a pooled analysis on hospital-based studies from 2000 to 2018. Front Oncol. 2019;9:548.
van Hagen P, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.
Sjoquist KM, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy forresectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):681–92.
Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Goetze TO, Meiler J, Kasper S et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1948–1195.
Kelly RJ, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT): first results of the checkmate 577 study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(4):S1142–S215.
Kato K, Sun J, Shah MA. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first line therapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer: the phase 3 KEYNOTE-590 study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(4):S1142–S215.
Chau I, Doki Y, Ajani JA, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: first results of the checkmate 648 study. 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting. 2021. Abstract 4001.
Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, et al. KEYNOTE-181 investigators. Randomized phase III KEYNOTE-181 study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(35):4138–48.
Kato K, Cho B, Takahashi M, Okada M, Lin C, Chin K, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1506–17.
Further Reading
Xu RH, Luo H, Lu J, et al. ESCORT-1st: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with untreated advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). J Clin Oncol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4000.
Shen L, Lu Z‑H, Wang J‑Y, et al. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastaticesophageal squamous cell cancer: first results of the phase III ORIENT-15 study. European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; September 16–21, 2021. 2021. Abstract LBA52.
Xu J, Jiang H, Pan Y, et al. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo as first-line treatment for advanced gastric orgastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma (ORIENT- 16: first results of a randomized, double-blind,phase III study. European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; September 16–21, 2021. 2021. Abstract LBA53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
E. Müldür and W. Hilbe declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müldür, E., Hilbe, W. Practice-changing strategies in the treatment of esophageal cancer. memo 15, 35–38 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-021-00779-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-021-00779-1