Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography

  • short review
  • Published:
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the world, with most patients having a dismal prognosis. As many as 40 % of lung cancers are diagnosed in stage IV, with current 5-year survival rates well below 20 %. Conventional chest radiography has been historically derided as a valid screening tool for this dreaded disease. A recent National Cancer Institute-sponsored study known as the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian cancer screening trial found no benefit from such screening in patients at risk. In recent years, low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest has emerged as a promising screening tool. Recent evidence from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated a 20 % reduction in mortality from lung cancer in patients undergoing three rounds of LDCT screening. Opponents of lung cancer screening favor its limited use in the setting of well-designed trials claiming excessive false-positive findings, overdiagnosis, and morbidity and mortality associated with invasive testing. That notwithstanding, leading medical societies such as ASCO and ATS have positioned themselves recently in favor of screening subjects meeting the NLST criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, McCauley DI, Sone S, Hanaoka T, Markowitz S, et al. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1763–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berlin NI, Buncher CR, Fontana RS, et al. The National Cancer Institute Cooperative Early Lung Cancer Detection Program. Results of the initial screen (prevalence). Early lung cancer detection: introduction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;130:545–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Flehinger BJ, Kimmel M, Polyak T, Melamed MR. Screening for lung cancer. The Mayo Lung Project revisited. Cancer. 1993;72:1573–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Strauss GM, Gleason RE, Sugarbaker DJ. Screening for lung cancer. Another look; a different view. Chest. 1997;111:754–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berlin NI. Overview of the NCI Cooperative Early Lung Cancer Detection Program. Cancer. 2000;89(11 Suppl.):2349–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Church TR, et al. Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA. 2011 Nov 2;306(17):1865–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, McGuinness G, Miettinen OS, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet. 1999;354(9173):99–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pastorino U, Bellomi M, Landoni C, et al. Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results. Lancet. 2003;362(9384):593–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Veronesi G, et al. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: a non-invasive diagnostic protocol for baseline lung nodules. Lung Cancer. 2008;61(3):340–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bach PB. Inconsistencies in findings from the Early Lung Cancer Action Project studies of lung cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(13):1002–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Henschke CI. Re: inconsistencies in findings from the Early Lung Cancer Action Project studies of lung cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(3):254–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tobin MJ. Counterpoint: evidence-based medicine lacks a sound scientific base. Chest. 2008 May;133(5):1071–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kovalchik SA, Tammemagi M, Berg CD, Caporaso NE, Riley TL, Korch M, et al. Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung cancer death. N Engl J Med. 2013:369(3);245–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, Mali WPTM, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, et al. Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer. 2007;120(4):868–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M, et al. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(23):2221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruano-Ravina A, Pérez Ríos M, Fernández-Villar A. Cribado de cáncer de pulmón con tomografía computarizada de baja dosis después del National Lung Screening Trial. El debate continúa abierto. Arch Bronconeumol. doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2012.10.003.

  19. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Mettler F, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012 June 7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0.

  21. Hendee WR, O’Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology. 2012:264(2):312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wisnivesky JP, Mushlin AI, Sicherman N, Henschke CI. The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: preliminary results of baseline screening. Chest. 2003;124(2):614–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goulart BH, Bensink ME, Mummy DG, Ramsey SD. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: costs, national expenditures, and cost-effectiveness. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012 Feb;10(2):267–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McMahon PM, Kong CY, Bouzan C, Weinstein MC, Cipriano LE, Tramontano AC, Johnson BE, Weeks JC, Gazelle GS. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the United States. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Nov;6(11):1841–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Villanti AC, Jiang Y, Abrams DB, Pyenson BS. A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions. PLoS One. 2013 Aug;8(8):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Aalst CM, et al. Lung cancer screening and smoking abstinence: 2 year follow-up data from the Dutch and Belgian randomised controlled lung cancer screening trial. Thorax. 2010;65(7):600–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2418–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pulmonary Department, IIS-Fundación Jimenez Díaz-CIBERES, Avenida de los Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Luis M. Seijo Maceiras MD

Authors
  1. Luis M. Seijo Maceiras MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis M. Seijo Maceiras MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seijo Maceiras, L. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. memo 7, 6–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-013-0127-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-013-0127-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation