Skip to main content
Log in

Imperative of continual support by the European Community for future advances in paediatric oncology in Europe: meeting report of the EC-funded science-communication project DIRECT “Overcoming Cancer with Research”

  • Experts Statement
  • Published:
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background/Purpose

Remarkable advances in paediatric cancer research and treatment were achieved during the last decades: In industrialised nations, overall cure rates were raised from below 20% to over 75% during the last forty years. Randomised investigator-driven clinical trials have been the backbone of this progress so far. The EU Clinical Trial Directive was introduced to improve the quality and safety of drug development; however, it has created considerable administrative “extra” workload as well as financial constraints for trials aiming at cancer treatment optimisation in children. It failed to provide harmonisation for clinical trials throughout Europe because translation into national law was highly divergent. To address the resulting challenges for future advances in European paediatric oncology including the promotion of new drug development, improved communication between all stakeholders is warranted.

Methods

Supported by the EC-funded FP7 science-communication project “DIRECT”, a meeting of European paediatric oncologists, representatives of patients’ and parents’ associations, survivors, and competent authorities was organised to investigate past successes and future challenges in paediatric oncology in Europe.

Results

The DIRECT-Symposium contributed to assess what is required in the future to advance the care and closer approach to “total cure” of European children and adolescents with cancer in all medical, psychological and social aspects. Various strategies were discussed and are summarised in this article.

Conclusion

EC-funded science-communication projects such as DIRECT are successful means to foster the public awareness of the necessities in caring for and curing paediatric cancer patients in the future. Amongst these, appreciation of the specific conditions and a need of continual funding by the EU are imperative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALL:

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

CTD:

Clinical trials directive

DIRECT:

Disseminate Results from EC funded projects improved Therapy options in paediatric oncology

EC:

European commission

EMEA:

European medicine agency

EORTC:

European organisation for research and treatment of cancer

EU:

European union

FP7:

7th Framework programme

GCP:

Good clinical practice

GPOH:

Society of paediatric oncology/haematology

IARC:

International agency for research on cancer

I–BFM:

International Berlin/Frankfurt/Muenster study group

IDCT:

Investigator driven clinical trials

IMP:

Investigational medicinal product

ITCC:

European consortium for innovative therapies for children with cancer

KPOH:

German competent net for paediatric oncology/ haematology

PDCO:

Paediatric committee

PIP:

Paediatric investigation plan

SIOP (-E):

International society of paediatric oncology (-Europe)

TOS:

Therapy optimising study

References

  1. Parkin DM, Stiller CA and Draper GJ et al (1988). The international incidence of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 42: 511–520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gatta G, Zigon G and Capocaccia R et al (2009). The EUROCARE working group. Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995–2002. Eur J Cancer 45: 992–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farber S, Diamond LK and Mercer RD et al (1948). Temporary remissions in acute leukaemia in children produced by folic acid antagonist, 4-aminoptryl-glutamic acid (Aminopterin). N Engl J Med 238: 787–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pritchard-Jones K, Steliarova-Foucher E and Stiller C et al (2006). Cancer in children and adolescents in Europe: developments over 20 years and future challenges. Eur J Cancer 42: 2183–2190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Server of the EC-FP7-project DIRECT. Available at www.forschenheiltkrebs.eu (accessed July 30th, 2009).

  6. Pritchard-Jones K. (2008). Clinical trials for children with cancer in Europe – Still a long way from harmonisation. A report from SIOP Europe. Eur J Cancer 44: 2106–2111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Creutzig U, Henze G, Bielack S, Herold R, Kaatsch P, Klussmann J-H, Graf N, Reinhardt D, Schrappe M, Zimmermann M, Juergens H. Krebserkrankungen bei Kindern. Erfolg durcheinheitliche Therapiekonzepte seit 25 Jahren. Deutsches Aerzteblatt, 100(13): A842– A852, 2003.

  8. Vassal G. (2009). Will children with cancer benefit from the new European Paediatric Medicines Regulation?. Eur J Cancer 45: 1535–1546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moericke A. Practical study execution on a national level. International Symposium on Past Successes and Future Challenges in Pediatric Oncology, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17, 2008. (abstr # 8)

  10. Biondi A. Overcoming cancer with research. May 15–17, 2008. Established therapeutic compounds. Introduction to session 3. International Symposium on Past Successes and Future Challenges in Pediatric Oncology, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17, 2008. (abstr # 10)

  11. Roberts R, Rodriguez W and Murphy D et al (2003). Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies. JAMA 290: 905–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thouvenel C, Gény MS and Demirdjian S et al (2002). Statuory pediatric Information’s available for anticancer drugs: inventory and proposals. Arch Pediatr 9: 685–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medical products for human use. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:121:0034:0044:EN:PDF (accessed 19.06.2009).

  14. Regulation (EC) No. 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 (Text with EEA relevance). http://eurlex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:378:0001:0019:EN:PDF (accessed 19.06.2009).

  15. Guidance on Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs) and other medicinal products used in clinical trials. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol-10/guidance-on-imp_nimp_04-2007.pdf (accessed 19.06.2009).

  16. Hearn J and Sullivan R. (2007). The impact of the ‘Clinical Trials’ directive on the cost and conduct of non-commercial cancer trials in the UK. Eur J Cancer 43: 8–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchel C. (2007). Clinical trials in paediatric haematology-oncology: are future successes threatened by the EU directive on the conduct of clinical trials?. Arch Dis Child 92: 1024–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baeyens AJ. (2004). Impact of the European clinical trials directive on the academic clinical research. Med Law 23: 103–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keim B. (2007). Tied up in red tape, European trials shut down. Nat Med 13: 110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Muellner M. Activities for licensing drugs – a regulator’s view. International Symposium on Past Successes and Future Challenges in Pediatric Oncology, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17, 2008. (abstr # 12).

  21. Hemminki A and Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL. (2006). Harmful impact of EU Clinical Trials Directive. BMJ 332: 501–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pieters R, Schrappe M and De Lorenzo P et al (2007). A treatment protocol for infants younger than 1 year with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Interfant-99): an observational study and a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 370: 240–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pieters R. Practical study execution on an international level. International Symposium on Past Successes and Future Challenges in Pediatric Oncology, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17, 2008. (abstr # 7)

  24. Schriever J. Legal Framework for clinical studies in the European Union. International Symposium on Past Successes and Future Challenges in Pediatric Oncology, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17, 2008. (abstr # 6)

  25. Lie SO. Practical needs of treatment. International Symposium on Past Successes and Future Challenges in Pediatric Oncology, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17, 2008. (abstr # 11)

  26. Jazbec J. Comments from EMEA PDCO. International Symposium on Past Successes and Future Challenges in Pediatric Oncology, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17, 2008. (abstr # 13)

  27. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P, et al. AVOREN Trial investigators. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet, 370: 2103–2111, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. SHARP Investigators Study Group. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med, 359: 378–390, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kola I and Landis J. (2004). Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?. Nat Rev Drug Disc 3: 711–715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morland B. ITCC activities. International Symposium on Past Successes and Future Challenges in Pediatric Oncology, Vienna, Austria, May 15–17, 2008. (abstr # 21)

  31. Goerger B, Morland B, Ndiaje A, et al. Target-driven exploratory study of imatinib mesylate in children with solid malignancies by the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer (ITCC) European Consortium. Eur J Cancer, (in press).

  32. http://www.emea.europa.eu/htms/huma/paediatrics/classwaivers.htm (accessed 19.06.2009).

  33. http://www.emea.europa.eu/htms/human/paediatrics/inventory.htm (accessed 19.06.2009).

  34. Note for guidance on evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man: addendum in paediatric oncology EMEA/CPMP/EWP/569/02 http://www.emea.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/056902en.pdf (accessed 19.06.2009).

  35. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, et al. Cross sectional survey of patients’ satisfaction with information about cancer. BMJ, 319: 1247– 1248, 1999.

  36. Wilkes L, White K, O’Riordan L. Empowerment through information: supporting rural families of oncology patients in palliative care. Ausr Rural Health, 8: 41–46, 2000.

  37. Informationportal of the German Society for Paediatric Oncology/ Haematology (GPOH) and the compentence network Paediatric Oncology/Haematology (KPOH). Available at: http://www. kinderkrebsinfo.de (accessed 17.08.2009).

  38. Herold R, Creutzig U and Henze G. (1999). Kompetenznetz Paediatrische Onkologie und Haematologie. Humboldt Spectr 4: 4–9

    Google Scholar 

  39. Creutzig U, Juergens H and Herold R et al (2004). Konzepte der GPOH und des Kompetenznetzes zur Weiterentwicklung und Qualitaetssicherung in der Paediatrischen Onkologie. Klin Paediatr 216: 379–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Herold R, Tallen G, Creutzig U, et al. Neuer Informationsserver im Internet fuer Betroffene, Fachleute und Laien in der Paediatrischen Onkologie und Haematologie: http://www.kinderkrebsinfo.de/ Monatsschr Kinderheilk, 150: 1301, 2002.

  41. Tallen G, Bode A, Reinken K, et al. Ein Online-Informationsdienst zu Krebserkrankungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen: http://www. kinderkrebsinfo.de. Newsletter Regionale Gesundheitsversorgung und Krankenpflege – Gesundheitsversorgung von Kindern: 23–25, 2008.

  42. European Science Foundation. Forward Look: Investigator Driven Clinical trials. <http://www.esf.org/publications/forward-looks. html> (accessed 17.06.2009).

  43. St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung. Gemeinsam die medizinische Versorgung von Kindern mit Krebs verbessern. “Observer” – Pressetext Austria: pts080519041, 19.05.2008, 17:27.

  44. St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung. Radeln fuer sich selbst und gegen Sarkome bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. “Observer” – Pressetext Austria: pts080708006, 08.07.2008, 08:30.

  45. Oesterreichische Apothekerkammer. Forschen heilt Krebs. “Observer” – OE 1 Online. Available at: http://www.OE1ORF.at (18.08.2008, 18.33).

  46. Clinical trials. Available at: http://ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed August 17, 2009).

  47. Jones CL and Holmgren E. (2007). An adaptive Simon two-stage design for phase 2 studies of targeted therapies. Contemp Clin Trials 28: 654–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Goebel U, Fischer R and Henze G. (1997). Von der Therapiestudie zur Qualitaetssicherung in der Paediatrischen Onkologie. Klin Paediatr 209: 145–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursula Creutzig MD.

Additional information

G. Tallen, M. Dworzak, as well as H. Gadner and Ursula Creutzig contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tallen, G., Dworzak, M., Gadner, H. et al. Imperative of continual support by the European Community for future advances in paediatric oncology in Europe: meeting report of the EC-funded science-communication project DIRECT “Overcoming Cancer with Research”. memo 2, 234–245 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-009-0168-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-009-0168-9

Keywords

Navigation