Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Therapeutic options for the treatment of infections with multiresistant grampositive bacteria in oncological patients

  • Short review
  • Published:
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Infections with highly resistant grampositive bacteria are a major threat to the patients with underlying malignant diseases and due to more aggressive treatment strategies the incidence of these infections increased over the past years. For many years, glycopeptides such as vancomycin, have been the standard treatment for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and ampicillin-resistant enterococci. However, the clinical use of vancomycin may be limited by the adverse effects like poor tissue penetration and the emergence of vancomycin-resistant strains such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci and staphylococci. Thus, in recent years, new antimicrobial agents have been introduced into clinical praxis or are under investigation. This review summarizes current clinical data on novel therapeutics such as linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin as well as investigational new drugs. Linezolid, an oxazolidinone derivative, has proven clinical activity only against infections with grampositive bacteria including vancomycin-resistant rods. Tigecycline is a tetracycline derivative with a very broad antimicrobial spectrum including multiresistant grampositive strains. Daptomycin, belonging to a new class of cyclic lipopeptide antibiotics, is approved for the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections, bactermia and endocarditis with grampositive bacteria. However, only limited data exist on the clinical use of tigecycline and daptomycin in oncological patients. In the near future, novel cephalosporins and carbapenems with activity against MRSA as well as new semisynthetic glycopeptides will extend our therapeutic possibilities in the treatment of infections by multiresistant grampositive bacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Phair JP, Riesing KS, Metzger E. Bacteremic infection and malnutrition in patients with solid tumors: investigation of host defense mechanisms. Cancer, 45(10): 2702–2706, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koll BS, Brown AE. The changing epidemiology of infections at cancer hospitals. Clin Infect Dis, 17(Suppl 2): S322–S328, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris PG, et al. Emergence of MRSA in positive blood cultures from patients with febrile neutropenia-a cause for concern. Support Care Cancer, 2008 February 15 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0398-5

  • Cosgrove SE, et al. Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis, 36(1): 53–59, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EARSS, European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System. http://www.rivm.nl/earss/

  • Chambers HF. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus? Emerg Infect Dis, 7(2): 178–182, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moellering RC, Linezolid: the first oxazolidinone antimicrobial. Ann Intern Med, 138(2): 135–142, 2003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt J, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49(6): 2260–2266, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein E, et al. Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis, 32(3): 402–412, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderink RG, et al. Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia. Chest, 124(5): 1789–1797, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PF, et al. Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of linezolid for treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections in cancer patients with neutropenia. Ann Oncol, 14(5): 795–801, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaksic B, et al. Efficacy and safety of linezolid compared with vancomycin in a randomized, double-blind study of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis, 42(5): 597–607, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef S, et al. The role of vitamin B6 in the prevention of haematological toxic effects of linezolid in patients with cancer. J Antimicrob Chemother, 61(2): 421–424, 2008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JJ, Wilson JW, Estes LL. Linezolid and serotonergic drug interactions: a retrospective survey. Clin Infect Dis, 43(2): 180–187, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Projan SJ. Preclinical pharmacology of GAR-936, a novel glycylcycline antibacterial agent. Pharmacotherapy, 20(9 Pt 2): 219S–223S; discussion 224S–228S, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen PJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of a novel glycylcycline, the 9-t-butylglycylamido derivative of minocycline (GAR-936). Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 43(4): 738–744, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis-Grosse EJ, et al. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: results of 2 double-blind phase 3 comparison studies with vancomycin-aztreonam. Clin Infect Dis, 41(Suppl 5): S341–S353, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breedt J, et al. Safety and efficacy of tigecycline in treatment of skin and skin structure infections: results of a double-blind phase 3 comparison study with vancomycin-aztreonam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49(11): 4658–4666, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babinchak T, et al. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: analysis of pooled clinical trial data. Clin Infect Dis, 41(Suppl 5): S354–S367, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen JN, et al. Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother, 55(3): 283–288, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arbeit RD, et al. The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections. Clin Infect Dis, 38(12): 1673–1681, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler VG Jr, et al. Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med, 355(7): 653–665, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman JA, et al. Inhibition of daptomycin by pulmonary surfactant: in vitro modeling and clinical impact. J Infect Dis, 191(12): 2149–2152, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poutsiaka DD, et al. Daptomycin in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia in neutropenic patients. J Infect, 54(6): 567–571, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noel GJ, et al. A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections. Clin Infect Dis, 46(5): 647–655, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noel GJ, et al. Results of a double-blind, randomized trial of ceftobiprole treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 52(1): 37–44, 2008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot GH, et al. Phase 2 study of ceftaroline versus standard therapy in treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 51(10): 3612–3616, 2007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koga T, et al. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of CS-023 (RO4908463), a novel parenteral carbapenem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49(8): 3239–3250, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kihara R, et al. Potency of SMP-601, a Novel Carbapenem, in Hematogenous Murine Bronchopneumonia Caused by Methicillin-Resistant and Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 52(6): 2163–2168, 2008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raad I, et al. Efficacy and safety of weekly dalbavancin therapy for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis, 40(3): 374–380, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer E, et al. Once-weekly dalbavancin versus standard-of-care antimicrobial regimens for treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis, 37(10): 1298–1303, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jauregui LE, et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of once-weekly dalbavancin versus twice-daily linezolid therapy for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Clin Infect Dis, 41(10): 1407–1415, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stryjewski ME, et al. Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections caused by gram-positive organisms. Clin Infect Dis, 46(11): 1683–1693, 2008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Micek ST, Alternatives to vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Infect Dis, 45(Suppl 3): S184–S190, 2007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peppard WJ, Schuenke CD. Iclaprim, a diaminopyrimidine dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor for the potential treatment of antibiotic-resistant staphylococcal infections. Curr Opin Investig Drugs, 9(2): 210–225, 2008

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Weiss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fritsche, G., Weiss, G. Therapeutic options for the treatment of infections with multiresistant grampositive bacteria in oncological patients. memo 1, 177–180 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-008-0057-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-008-0057-7

Keywords

Navigation