Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Peritumoral Retraction Clefting & Intratumoral Eosinophils on Overall Survival in Oral Squamous Carcinoma Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pathology & Oncology Research

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of peritumoral retraction clefts (RC) and tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) as predictors of overall survival (OS) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients. Their relationships with tumor-factors were also examined. Eighty-seven OSCC cases (pTNM: I + II/III + IV; 32/55), post-curative surgery, comprised the study cohort. Three observers independently estimated the percent RC semi-quantitatively in the selected tumor sections. Additionally, stromal eosinophils were counted in ten consecutive high-power fields of intratumoral and peritumoral regions to evaluate the corresponding TATE. The percent RC ranged between 0% -90% (Mean ± SD: 16 ± 24%; Median: 5%). The stromal eosinophils were greater in peritumoral as compared to intratumoral region. The events of death and tumor recurrence were reached in 16 (18.4%) and 36 (41%) cases respectively. The 3-years OS was 69% [Median OS: 1880 days; Mean follow up: 471(Range; 36–1880) days]. Increased percent RC exhibited relationship with pathologic stage (pTNM III&IV), primary tumor (pT III&IV), tumor depth > 4 mm and categorical tumor recurrence. Additionally, peritumoral eosinophilic infiltrates increased with increasing tumor depths and muscle invasion. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significantly reduced OS in OSCC cases exhibiting: increased percent RC (>2.5%), mild -moderate/absent intratumoral TATE (versus intense TATE) or categorical tumor recurrence. In subsequent multivariate tests, all the three variables retained significance. Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for the observers who estimated percent RC. In conclusion, RC and intratumoral TATE proved to be independent predictors of OS in our OSCC cohort. Additionally, increased percent RC pointed towards aggressive tumor behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKenney JK, Gomez JA, Desai S, Lee MW, Amin MB (2001) Morphologic expressions of urothelial carcinoma in situ: a detailed evaluation of its histologic patterns with emphasis on carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Am J Surg Pathol 25:356–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Irie J, Manucha V, Ioffe OB, Silverberg SG (2007) Artefact as the pathologist’s friend: peritumoral retraction in in situ and infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast. Int J Surg Pathol 15:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kossard S, Epstein EH Jr, Cerio R et al (2006) Basal cell carcinoma. In: LeBoit PE, Burg G, Weedon D, Sarasain A (eds) World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Skin Tumours, 3rd edn. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krušlin B, Tomas D, Rogatsch H, Novosel I, Čupić H, Belicza M, Kraus O, Mikuz G (2003) Periacinar retraction clefting in the prostatic needle core biopsies: an important diagnostic criterion or a simple artifact? Virchows Arch 443:524–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell KA, Smith Sehdev AE, Kurman RJ (2001) Refined diagnostic criteria for implants associated with ovarian atypical proliferative serous tumors (borderline) and micropapillary serous carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 25:419–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Acs G, Khakpour N, Kiluk J, Lee MC, Laronga C (2015) The presence of Extensive Retraction Clefts in Invasive Breast Carcinomas correlates with lymphatic invasion and nodal metastasis and predicts poor outcome. A prospective validation study of 2742 consecutive cases. Am J Surg Pathol 39:325–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Acs G, Paragh G, Rakosy Z, Laronga C, Zhang PJ (2012) The extent of retraction clefts correlates with lymphatic vessel density and VEGF-C expression and predicts nodal metastasis and poor prognosis in early-stage breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol 25:163–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Acs G, Dumoff KL, Solin LJ, Pasha T, Xu X, Zhang PJ (2007) Extensive retraction artifact correlates with lymphatic invasion and nodal metastasis and predicts poor outcome in early stage breast carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 31:129–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomas D, Spajić B, Milošević M, Demirović A, Marušić Z, Krušlin B (2011) Extensive retraction artifact predicts biochemical recurrence -free survival in prostatic carcinoma. Histopathology 58:447–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bujas T, Pavić I, Leniček T, Mijić A, Krušlin B, Tomas D (2008) Peritumoral retraction clefting correlates with advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Pathol Oncol Res 14:443–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pereira MC, Oliveira DT, Kowalski LP (2011) The role of eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in oral cancer: a review. Arch Oral Bio 56:353–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain D, Tikku G, Bhadana P, Dravid C, Grover RK (2017) A semi-quantitative World Health Organization grading scheme evaluating worst tumor differentiation predicts disease-free survival in oral squamous carcinoma patients. Ann Diagn Pathol 29:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Acs G, Paragh G, Chuang ST, Laronga C, Zhang PJ (2009) The presence of micropapillary features and retraction artifact in core needle biopsy material predicts lymph node metastasis in breast carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 33:202–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rakosy Z, Paragh G, Acs G (2010) A distinct gene expression profiling is associated with aggressive breast carcinomas showing prominent retraction artifact. Mod Pathol 23(suppl 1s):67A

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gombos Z, Xu X, Chu CS, Zhang PJ, Acs G (2005) Peritumoral lymphatic vessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor C expression in early stage squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Clin Cancer Res 11:8364–8371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krušlin B, Tomas D, Čviko A, Čupić H, Odak L, Belicza M (2006) Periacinar clefting and p63 immunostaining in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostatic carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res 12:205–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomas D, Kruslin B (2004) The potential value of (myo)fibroblastic stromal reaction in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostate 61:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dorta RG, Landman G, Kowalski LP, Lauris JR, Latorre MR, Oliveira DT (2002) Tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia as a prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Histopathology 41:152–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldsmith MM, Cresson DH, Askin FB (1987) Part II. The prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilia in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 96:319–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldsmith MM, Belchis DA, Cresson DH, Merritt WD, Askin FB (1992) The importance of the eosinophil in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 106:27–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong DT, Bowen SM, Elovic A, Gallagher GT, Weller PF (1999) Eosinophil ablation and tumor development. Oral Oncol 35:496–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Horiuchi K, Mishima K, Ohsawa M, Sugimura M, Aozasa K (1993) Prognostic factors for well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity with emphasis on immunohistochemical evaluation. J Surg Oncol 53:92–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tadbir AA, Ashraf MJ, Sardari Y (2009) Prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilic infiltration in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Craniofac Surg 20:287–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oliveira DT, Tjioe KC, Assao A, Faustino SES, Carvalho AL, Landman G, Kowalski LP (2009) Tissue eosinophilia and its association with tumoral invasion of oral cancer. Int J Surg Pathol 17:244–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lundqvist L, Stenlund H, Laurell G, Nylander K (2012) The importance of stromal inflammation in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. J Oral Pathol Med 41:379–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simson L, Ellyard JI, Dent LA, Matthaei KI, Rothenberg ME, Foster PS, Smyth MJ, Parish CR (2007) Regulation of carcinogenesis by IL-5 and CCL11: a potential role for eosinophils in tumor immune surveillance. J Immunol 178:4222–4229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the residents, colleagues and technical staff of the Institute.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhruv Jain.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial)

The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals

For this type of retrospective study, formal consent was not required from Institutional Ethics Committee. However, every effort was made to maintain strict secrecy of the patients’ identity during all stages of the study.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, D., Tikku, G., Bhadana, P. et al. The Impact of Peritumoral Retraction Clefting & Intratumoral Eosinophils on Overall Survival in Oral Squamous Carcinoma Patients. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 25, 183–189 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-017-0328-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-017-0328-x

Keywords

Navigation