Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mutant KRAS Status Is Associated with Increased KRAS Copy Number Imbalance: a Potential Mechanism of Molecular Heterogeneity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pathology & Oncology Research

Abstract

Mutation rates determined by allele-specific PCR can be highly different in KRAS exon 2 mutant colorectal carcinoma (CRC) samples suggesting intratumoural heterogeneity. To address the effect of KRAS gene copy number on the relative mutant allele frequency the KRAS locus was individually quantified following FISH analysis in 36 cases. We observed, that mutant KRAS status was associated with an elevated KRAS locus number (2.36 ± 0.42 vs 2.63 ± 0.75; p = 0.037) reflecting an increased aneuploidy status but no true amplification of the locus. In parallel, KRAS locus copy numbers showed significant intercellular variability (1–16 copies/cell nucleus) within individual tumours also indicating to a dynamic intratumoural oscillation of the mutant allele copy number. In conclusion, aneusomy is a common feature of KRAS mutant CRC and KRAS copy number variations may have an impact on the relative mutant allele frequency detected by allele specific PCR/sequencing), potentially leading to subclonal diversity and influencing tumour behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neumann J, Zeindl-Eberhart E, Kirchner T, Jung A (2009) Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract 205(12):858–862

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lièvre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D et al (2006) KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 66(8):3992–3995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Krieken JH, Jung A, Kirchner T et al (2008) KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program. Virchows Arch 453(5):417–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M et al (2008) Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(10):1626–1634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ et al (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359(17):1757–1765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu S, Xiao X, Lu J, Qian X, Liu B, Feng J (2013) Colorectal Cancer Patients with Low Abundance of KRAS Mutation May Benefit from EGFR Antibody Therapy. PLoS One 8(7)

  7. Dócs O, Fazakas F, Horváth NL et al (2015) Changes of KRAS exon 2 codon 12/13 mutation status in recurrent colorectal cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 21(2):399–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakhoum SF, Compton DA (2012) Chromosomal instability and cancer: a complex relationship with therapeutic potential. J Clin Invest 122(4):1138–1143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Orum H, Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Berg RH, Buchardt O, Stanley C (1993) Single base pair mutation analysis by BNA directed PCR clamping. Nucleic Acids Res 21(23):5332–5336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cappuzzo F, Hirsch FR, Rossi E et al (2005) Epidermal growth factor receptor Gene and Protein and Gefitinib sensitivity in non–small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(9):643–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fehrmann RS, Karjalainen JM, Krajewska M et al (2015) Gene expression analysis identifies global gene dosage sensitivity in cancer. Nat Genet 47(2):115–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moroni M, Veronese S, Benvenuti S et al (2005) Gene copy number for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and clinical response to antiEGFR treatment in colorectal cancer: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol 6(5):279–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seth R, Crook S, Ibrahem S, Fadhil W, Jackson D, Ilyas M (2009) Concomitant mutations and splice variants in KRAS and BRAF demonstrate complex perturbation of the ras/Raf signalling pathway in advanced colorectal cancer. Gut 58(9):1234–1241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Valtorta E, Misale S, Sartore-Bianchi A et al (2013) KRAS gene amplification in colorectal cancer and impact on response to EGFR-targeted therapy. Int J Cancer 133(5):1259–1265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrera LA, Prada D, Andonegui MA, González AD (2008) The epigenetic origin of aneuploidy. Curr Genomics 9(1):43–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hegyi K, Méhes G (2012) Mitotic failures in cancer: aurora B kinase and its potential role in the development of aneuploidy. Pathol Oncol Res. 18(4):761–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soh J, Okumura N, Lockwood WW et al Oncogene mutations, copy number gains and mutant allele specific imbalance (MASI) frequently occur together in tumour cells. PLoS One s4(10):e7464

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the project grant TÁMOP-4.2.2. A-11/1/KONV-2012-0045 of the European Union with cooperation with the European Social Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gábor Méhes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dócs, O., Hegyi, K., Mokánszky, A. et al. Mutant KRAS Status Is Associated with Increased KRAS Copy Number Imbalance: a Potential Mechanism of Molecular Heterogeneity. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 23, 417–423 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-016-0126-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-016-0126-x

Keywords

Navigation