Labeling of influenza viruses with synthetic fluorescent and biotin-labeled lipids
- 534 Downloads
Direct labeling of virus particles is a powerful tool for the visualization of virus-cell interaction events. However, this technique involves the chemical modification of viral proteins that affects viral biological properties. Here we describe an alternative approach of influenza virus labeling that utilizes Function-Spacer-Lipid (FSL) constructs that can be gently inserted into the virus membrane. We assessed whether labeling with fluorescent (fluo-Ad-DOPE) or biotin-labeled (biot-CMG2-DOPE) probes has any deleterious effect on influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) receptor specificity, neuraminidase (NA) activity, or replicative ability in vitro. Our data clearly show that neither construct significantly affected influenza virus infectivity or viral affinity to sialyl receptors. Neither construct influenced the NA activities of the influenza viruses tested, except the A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1) strain. Our data indicate that lipid labeling provides a powerful tool to analyze influenza virus infection in vitro.
Keywordsbioimaging Function-Spacer-Lipid (FSL) constructs labeling of influenza viruses synthetic lipids
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blake D, Bovin N, Bess D, Henry S. 2011. FSL constructs: a simple method for modifying cell/virion surfaces with a range of biological markers without affecting their viability. J Vis Exp, 54:e3289.Google Scholar
- Ewers H., Schelhaas M. 2012. Analysis of virus entry and cellular membrane dynamics by single particle tracking. In: Methods in Enzymology, 506:63–80.Google Scholar
- Matrosovich M N, Gambaryan A S, Tuzikov A B, Byramova N E, Mochalova L V, Golbraikh A A, Shenderovich M D, Finne J, Bovin N V. 1993. Probing of the receptor-binding sites of the H1 and H3 influenza virus hemagglutinins by synthetic and natural sialosides. Virology, 196:111–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reed L J, Muench H. 1938. A simple method for estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg, 27:493–497.Google Scholar
- Wright P F, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. 2006. Orthomyxoviruses In: Knipe D M, Howley P M (eds), Fields Virology, 5th ed, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp1641–1740.Google Scholar