Abstract
The henipaviruses, represented by Nipah virus and Hendra virus, are emerging zoonotic viral pathogens responsible for repeated outbreaks associated with high morbidity and mortality in Australia, Southeast Asia, India and Bangladesh. These viruses enter host cells via a class I viral fusion mechanism mediated by their attachment and fusion envelope glycoproteins; efficient membrane fusion requires both these glycoproteins in conjunction with specific virus receptors present on susceptible host cells. The henipavirus attachment glycoprotein interacts with a cellular B class ephrin protein receptor triggering conformational alterations leading to the activation of the viral fusion (F) glycoprotein. The analysis of monoclonal antibody (mAb) reactivity with G has revealed measurable alterations in the antigenic structure of the glycoprotein following its binding interaction with receptor. These observations only appear to occur with full-length native G glycoprotein, which is a tetrameric oligomer, and not with soluble forms of G (sG), which are disulfide-linked dimers. Single amino acid mutations in a heptad repeat-like structure within the stalk domain of G can disrupt its association with F and subsequent membrane fusion promotion activity. Notably, these mutants of G also appear to confer a post-receptor bound conformation implicating the stalk domain as an important element in the G glycoprotein’s structure and functional relationship with F. Together, these observations suggest fusion is dependent on a specific interaction between the F and G glycoproteins of the henipaviruses. Further, receptor binding induces measurable changes in the G glycoprotein that appear to be greatest in respect to the interactions between the pairs of dimers comprising its native tetrameric structure. These receptor-induced conformational changes may be associated with the G glycoprotein’s promotion of the fusion activity of F.
References
Anonymous. 2008. Hendra Virus, Human, Equine — Australia (Queensland). International Society for Infectious Diseases. Report No.: 20080821.2606.
Anonymous. 2007. Hendra Virus, Human, Equine Australia, (Queensland): correction. International Society for Infectious Diseases. Report No.: 20070903.2896.
Anonymous. 2008. Nipah Virus, Fatal — Bangladesh (Dhaka). International Society for Infectious Diseases. Report No.: 20080311.0979.
Bishop K A, Broder C C. 2008. Hendra and Nipah: Lethal Zoonotic Paramyxoviruses. In: Emerging Infections (Scheld W M, Hammer S M, Hughes J M, ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology.
Bishop K A, Hickey A C, Khetawat D,et al. 2008. Residues in the stalk domain of the hendra virus g glycoprotein modulate conformational changes associated with receptor binding. J Virol, 82(22): 11398–11409.
Bishop K A, Stantchev T S, Hickey A C,et al. 2007. Identification of hendra virus g glycoprotein residues that are critical for receptor binding. J Virol. 81(11): 5893–5901.
Bonaparte M I, Dimitrov A S, Bossart K N,et al. 2005. Ephrin-B2 ligand is a functional receptor for Hendra virus and Nipah virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102(30): 10652–10657.
Bossart K N, Broder C C. 2009. Paramyxovirus Entry. In: Viral Entry into Host Cells (Pöhlmann S, Simmons G, ed.). Austin: TX Landes Bioscience.
Bossart K N, Crameri G, Dimitrov A S,et al. 2005. Receptor binding, fusion inhibition, and induction of cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies by a soluble g glycoprotein of hendra virus. J Virol, 79(11): 6690–6702.
Bossart K N, McEachern J A, Hickey A C,et al. 2007. Neutralization assays for differential henipavirus serology using Bio-Plex Protein Array Systems. J Virol Methods, 142(1–2): 29–40.
Bossart K N, Wang L F, Eaton B T,et al. 2001. Functional expression and membrane fusion tropism of the envelope glycoproteins of Hendra virus. Virology, 290(1): 121–135.
Bossart K N, Wang L F, Flora M N,et al. 2002. Membrane fusion tropism and heterotypic functional activities of the nipah virus and hendra virus envelope glycoproteins. J Virol, 76(22): 11186–11198.
Bowden T A, Aricescu A R, Gilbert R J,et al. 2008. Structural basis of Nipah and Hendra virus attachment to their cell-surface receptor ephrin-B2. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 15(6): 567–572.
Chua K B. 2003. Nipah virus outbreak in Malaysia. J Clin Virol, 26(3): 265–275.
Chua K B, Goh K J, Wong K T,et al. 1999. Fatal encephalitis due to Nipah virus among pig-farmers in Malaysia [see comments]. Lancet, 354(9186): 1257–1259.
Corey E A, Iorio R M. 2007. Mutations in the stalk of the measles virus hemagglutinin protein decrease fusion but do not interfere with virus-specific interaction with the homologous fusion protein. J Virol, 81(18): 9900–9910.
Deng R, Wang Z, Mirza A M,et al. 1995. Localization of a domain on the paramyxovirus attachment protein required for the promotion of cellular fusion by its homologous fusion protein spike. Virology, 209(2): 457–469.
Drescher U. 2002. Eph family functions from an evolutionary perspective. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 12(4): 397–402.
Eaton B T, Broder C C, Middleton D,et al. 2006. Hendra and Nipah viruses: different and dangerous. Nat Rev Microbiol, 4(1): 23–35.
Eaton B T, Broder C C, Wang L F. 2005. Hendra and Nipah viruses: pathogenesis and therapeutics. Curr Mol Med, 5(8): 805–816.
Eaton B T, Mackenzie J S, Wang L-F. 2007. Henipaviruses. In: Fields Virology (Knipe D M, Howley P M, ed.). 5 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 1587–1600.
Epstein J H, Prakash V, Smith C S,et al. 2008. Henipavirus infection in fruit bats (Pteropus giganteus), India. Emerg Infect Dis, 14(8): 1309–1311.
Guillaume V, Aslan H, Ainouze M,et al. 2006. Evidence of a potential receptor-binding site on the Nipah virus G protein (NiV-G): identification of globular head residues with a role in fusion promotion and their localization on an NiV-G structural model. J Virol, 80(15): 7546–7554.
Gurley E S, Montgomery J M, Hossain M J,et al. 2007. Person-to-person transmission of Nipah virus in a Bangladeshi community. Emerg Infect Dis, 13(7): 1031–1037.
Harcourt B H, Lowe L, Tamin A,et al. 2005. Genetic characterization of Nipah virus, Bangladesh, 2004. Emerg Infect Dis, 11(10): 1594–1597.
Harit A K, Ichhpujani R L, Gupta S,et al. 2006. Nipah/Hendra virus outbreak in Siliguri, West Bengal, India in 2001. Indian J Med Res. 123(4): 553–560.
Hayman D T, Suu-Ire R, Breed A C,et al. 2008. Evidence of henipavirus infection in West African fruit bats. PLoS ONE, 3(7): e2739.
Heroult M, Schaffner F, Augustin H G. 2006. Eph receptor and ephrin ligand-mediated interactions during angiogenesis and tumor progression. Exp Cell Res, 312(5): 642–650.
Iorio R M, Mahon P J. 2008. Paramyxoviruses: different receptors — different mechanisms of fusion. Trends Microbiol, 16(4): 135–137.
Krishanan S, Biswas K. 2007. Nipah Outbreak in India and Bangladesh. Newsletter: World Health Organization-South East Asia regional office.
Lamb R A, Jardetzky T S. 2007. Structural basis of viral invasion: lessons from paramyxovirus F. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 17(4): 427–436.
Lamb R A, Parks G D. 2007. Paramyxoviridae: The Viruses and Their Replication. In: Fields Virology (Knipe D M, Howley P M, ed.). 5 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p 1449–1496.
Lamb R A, Paterson R G, Jardetzky T S. 2006. Paramyxovirus membrane fusion: Lessons from the F and HN atomic structures. Virology, 344(1): 30–37.
Lawrence M C, Borg N A, Streltsov V A,et al. 2004. Structure of the haemagglutinin-neuraminidase from human parainfluenza virus type III. J Mol Biol, 335(5): 1343–1357.
Li Y, Wang J, Hickey A C,et al. 2008. Antibodies to Nipah or Nipah-like viruses in bats, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 14(12): 1974–1976.
Luby S P, Rahman M, Hossain M J,et al. 2006. Foodborne transmission of Nipah virus, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis, 12(12): 1888–1894.
Melanson V R, Iorio R M. 2006. Addition of N-glycans in the stalk of the Newcastle disease virus HN protein blocks its interaction with the F protein and prevents fusion. J Virol, 80(2): 623–633.
Melanson V R, Iorio R M. 2004. Amino acid substitutions in the F-specific domain in the stalk of the newcastle disease virus HN protein modulate fusion and interfere with its interaction with the F protein. J Virol, 78(23): 13053–13061.
Morrison T G. 2001. The three faces of paramyxovirus attachment proteins. Trends Microbiol, 9(3): 103–105.
Murray G. 2006. Miscellaneous: Hendra Virus Findings in Queensland, Australia. Paris, France: World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), www.oie.int. Report No.: Vol. 19 - No. 26.
Negrete O A, Levroney E L, Aguilar H C,et al. 2005. EphrinB2 is the entry receptor for Nipah virus, an emergent emergent deadly paramyxovirus. Nature, 436(7049): 401–405.
Pager C T, Craft W W, Jr Patch J,et al. 2006. A mature and fusogenic form of the Nipah virus fusion protein requires proteolytic processing by cathepsin L. Virology, 346(2): 251–257.
Pager C T, Dutch R E. 2005. Cathepsin L is involved in proteolytic processing of the hendra virus fusion protein. J Virol, 79(20): 12714–12720.
Pasquale E B. 2004. Eph-ephrin promiscuity is now crystal clear. Nat Neurosci, 7(5): 417–418.
Plemper R K, Hammond A L, Gerlier D,et al. 2002. Strength of envelope protein interaction modulates cytopathicity of measles virus. J Virol, 76(10): 5051–5061.
Poliakov A, Cotrina M, Wilkinson D G. 2004. Diverse roles of eph receptors and ephrins in the regulation of cell migration and tissue assembly. Dev Cell, 7(4): 465–480.
Reynes J M, Counor D, Ong S,et al. 2005. Nipah virus in Lyle’s flying foxes, Cambodia. Emerg Infect Dis, 11(7): 1042–1047.
Russell C J, Jardetzky T S, Lamb R A. 2001. Membrane fusion machines of paramyxoviruses: capture of intermediates of fusion. Embo J, 20(15): 4024–4034.
Stone-Hulslander J, Morrison T G. 1997. Detection of an interaction between the HN and F proteins in Newcastle disease virus-infected cells. J Virol, 71(9): 6287–6295.
Stone-Hulslander J, Morrison T G. 1999. Mutational analysis of heptad repeats in the membrane-proximal region of Newcastle disease virus HN protein. J Virol, 73(5): 3630–3637.
Takimoto T, Taylor G L, Connaris H C,et al. 2002. Role of the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein in the mechanism of paramyxovirus-cell membrane fusion. J Virol, 76(24): 13028–13033.
Tanabayashi K, Compans R W. 1996. Functional interaction of paramyxovirus glycoproteins: identification of a domain in Sendai virus HN which promotes cell fusion. J Virol, 70(9): 6112–6118.
Tsurudome M, Kawano M, Yuasa T,et al. 1995. Identification of regions on the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein of human parainfluenza virus type 2 important for promoting cell fusion. Virology, 213(1): 190–203.
Wang B, Zhang N, Qian K X,et al. 2005. Conserved molecular players for axon guidance and angiogenesis. Curr Protein Pept Sci, 6(5): 473–478.
Wong K T, Shieh W J, Kumar S,et al. 2002. Nipah virus infection: pathology and pathogenesis of an emerging paramyxoviral zoonosis. Am J Pathol, 161(6): 2153–2167.
Xu K, Rajashankar K R, Chan Y P,et al. 2008. Host cell recognition by the henipaviruses: crystal structures of the Nipah G attachment glycoprotein and its complex with ephrin-B3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105(29): 9953–9958.
Yu M, Hansson E, Langedijk J P,et al. 1998. The attachment protein of Hendra virus has high structural similarity but limited primary sequence homology compared with viruses in the genus Paramyxovirus. Virology, 251(2): 227–233.
Yuan P, Thompson T B, Wurzburg B A,et al. 2005. Structural studies of the parainfluenza virus 5 hemagglutinin-neuraminidase tetramer in complex with its receptor, sialyllactose. Structure (Camb), 13(5): 803–815.
Zhang J, Hughes S. 2006. Role of the ephrin and Eph receptor tyrosine kinase families in angiogenesis and development of the cardiovascular system. J Pathol, 208(4): 453–461.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: This work was supported in part by NIH grant AI054715 to C.C.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hickey, A.C., Broder, C.C. The mechanism of henipavirus fusion: Examining the relationships between the attachment and fusion glycoproteins. Virol. Sin. 24, 110–120 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-009-3027-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-009-3027-2
CLC number
- Q939.4
Key words
- Hendra virus
- Nipah virus
- Henipavirus
- Paramyxovirus
- Viral entry