Abstract
Objective
Polysorbates 20 and 80 are the most used surfactants for the development of parenteral protein formulations, because of their beneficial safety and stabilisation profile. Although, showing excellent stabilisation properties, the stabilisation mechanism(s) of these surfactants for aqueous protein formulations are still unclear. Different stabilisation models have been discussed in the literature, among them the possible formation of protein-surfactant micelle complexes.
Methods
This study focusses on the determination of the self-association properties of compendial grade polysorbate 20 HP (PS 20 HP) and polysorbate 80 HP (PS 80 HP) with regard to the formed micelle size (by dynamic light scattering, DLS), the concentration upon which the surfactant molecules self-associate (cmr, critical micelle concentration range) to form micelles, and the related surface tension. Surface tension and micelle size were determined as a function of temperature, as well as composition of the formulation (presence of a buffer salt and influence of ionic strength).
Results
The critical micelle concentration range values (cmr) at 25 °C are between 15–75 μM for PS 20 HP, but considerably lower for PS 80 HP with 7–16 μM, depending only slightly on the formulation composition. With increasing temperature, the cmr decreases slightly. PS 80 HP forms larger micelles (Rh = 4.5 nm) compared with PS 20 HP (Rh = 3.5 nm) (25 °C). The temperature dependency of the micelle size is more pronounced for PS 80 HP.
Conclusions
Based on these results, the suggested stabilisation mechanism, especially for antibody formulations, by the formation of antibody-polysorbate micelle complexes, is critically discussed, and the current study shows that this stabilisation mechanism is not likely, for commonly used monoclonal antibody formulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dwivedi M, Blech M, Presser I, Garidel P. Polysorbate degradation in biotherapeutic formulations: identification and discussion of current root causes. Int J Pharm. 2018;552:422–36.
Ravuri KSK. Polysorbate degradation and quality. AAPS Adv Pharmaceut Sci Ser. 2018;38:25–62.
Bahetia A, Kumarb L, Bansalb AK. Excipients used in lyophilization of small molecules. J Excipients Food Chem. 2010;1(1):41–54.
Moreton RC. Excipients to the year 2025 – and beyond! J Excipients Food Chem. 2019;10(2):29–40.
Gervasi V, Dall Agnol R, Cullen S, McCoy T, Vucen S, Crean A. Parenteral protein formulations: an overview of approved products within the European Union. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;131:8–24.
Huang Z, Wu M, Ma C, Bai X, Thang X, Zhao Z, et al. Spectroscopic quantification of surfactants in solid lipid nanoparticles. J Pharm Innov. 2020;15:155–62.
Carpenter JF, Manning MC, editors. Rational design of stable protein formulations. Theory and practice. LLC, New York: Springer Science - Business Media; 2002.
Garidel P, Blume A, Wagner M. Prediction of colloidal stability of high concentration protein formulations. Pharm Dev Technol. 2015;20:367–74.
Garidel P, Kuhn AB, Schäfer LV, Karow-Zwick AR, Blech M. High-concentration protein formulations: how high is high? Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2017;119:353–60.
Khan TA, Mahler HC, Kishore RSK. Key interactions of surfactants in therapeutic protein formulations: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;97:60–7.
Maggio ET. Use of excipients to control aggregation in peptide and protein formulations. J Excipients Food Chem. 2010;1(2):40–9.
Sahin E, Deshmukh S. Challenges and considerations in development and manufacturing of high concentration biologics drug products. J Pharm Innov. 2020;15:255–67.
Wang W, Wang J, Wang DQ. Dual effects of tween 80 on protein stability. Int J Pharm. 2008;347:31–8.
Den Engelsman J, Garidel P, Smulders R, Koll H, Smith B, Bassarab S, et al. Strategies for the assessment of protein aggregates in pharmaceutical biotech product development. Pharm Res. 2011;28:920–33.
Garidel P, Kebbel F. Protein therapeutics and aggregates characterized by photon correlation spectroscopy. BioProcess Int. 2010;8:38–46.
Final report on the safety assessment of polysorbates 20, 21, 40, 60, 61, 65, 80, 81, and 85. J Am Coll Toxicol. 1984;3(5):1–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/10915818409021272.
Falconer RJ. Advances in liquid formulations of parenteral therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:107412.
Maggio ET. Polysorbates, peroxides, protein aggregation, and immunogenicity – a growing concern. J Excipients Food Chem. 2012;3(2):45–53.
Maggio ET. Reducing or eliminating polysorbate induced anaphylaxis and unwanted immunogenicity in biotherapeutics. J Excipients Food Chem. 2017;8(2):52–61.
Schwartzberg LS, Navari RM. Safety of polysorbate 80 in the oncology setting. Adv Ther. 2018;35:754–67.
Singh SK, Mahler HC, Hartman C, Stark CA. Are injection site reactions in monoclonal antibody therapies caused by polysorbate excipient degradants? J Pharm Sci. 2018;107:2735–41.
Tomlinson A, Demeule B, Lin B, Yadav S. Polysorbate 20 degradation in biopharmaceutical formulations: quantification of free fatty acids, characterization of particulates, and insights into the degradation mechanism. Mol Pharm. 2015;2015(12):3805–15.
Dixit N, Salamat-Miller N, Salinas PA, Taylor KD, Basu SK. Residual host cell protein promotes polysorbate 20 degradation in a sulfatase drug product leading to free fatty acid particles. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105:1657–66.
Dwivedi M, Buske J, Haemmerling F, Blech M, Garidel P. Acidic and alkaline hydrolysis of polysorbates under aqueous conditions: towards understanding polysorbate degradation in biopharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;144:105211.
Zhang L, Yadav S, Demeule B, Wang J, Mozziconacci O, Schӧneich C. Degradation mechanisms of polysorbate 20 differentiated by 18O-labeling and mass spectrometry. Pharm Res. 2017;34:84–100.
Cheng Y, Hu M, Zamiri C, Carcelen T, Demeule B, Tomlinson A, et al. A rapid high-sensitivity reversed phase ultra high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method for assessing polysorbate 20 degradation in protein therapeutics. J Pharm Sci. 2019;108:2880–6.
Dahotre S, Tomlinson A, Lin B, Yadav S. Novel markers to track oxidative polysorbate degradation in pharmaceutical formulations. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;157:201–7.
Evers DH, Schultz-Fademrecht T, Garidel P, Buske J. Development and validation of a selective marker-based quantification of polysorbate 20 in biopharmaceutical formulations using UHPLC QDa detection. J Chromatography B. 2020:122287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122287.
Lee HJ, McAuley A, Schilke KF, McGuire J. Molecular origins of surfactant-mediated stabilization of protein drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:1160–71.
Koepf E, Eisele S, Schroeder R, Brezesinski G, Friess W. Notorious but not understood: how liquid-air interfacial stress triggers protein aggregation. Int J Pharm. 2018a;637:202–12.
Koepf E, Schroeder R, Brezesinski G, Friess W. The film tells the story: physical-chemical characteristics of IgG at the liquid-air interface. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018b;119:396–407.
Tanford C (1980) The hydrophobic effect. Formation of micelles and biological membranes. Wiley; Brisbane, Chichester, New York, Toronto.
Garidel P, Hoffmann C, Blume A. A thermodynamic analysis of the binding interaction between polysorbate 20 and 80 with human serum albumins and immunoglobulins: a contribution to understand colloidal protein stabilization. Biophys Chem. 2009;143:70–8.
Hoffmann C, Blume A, Miller I, Garidel P. Insights into protein-polysorbate interactions analysed by means of isothermal titration and differential scanning calorimetry. Eur Biophys J. 2009;38:557–68.
McAuley WJ, Jones DS, Kett VL. Characterisation of the interaction of lactate dehydrogenase with Tween-20 using isothermal titration calorimetry, interfacial rheometry and surface tension measurements. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98:2659–69.
Kerth A, Garidel P, Howe J, Alexander C, Mach JP, Waelli T, et al. An infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopic (IRRAS) study of the interaction of lipid A and lipopolysaccharide re with endotoxin-binding proteins. Med Chem. 2009;5:535–42.
Kudryashova EV, Meinders MBJ, Visser AJWG, van Hoek A, de Jongh HJ. Structure and dynamics of egg white ovalbumin adsorbed at the air/water interface. Eur Biophys J. 2003;32(6):553–62.
Martin AH, Meinders MBJ, Bos MA, Cohen Stuart MA, Van Vliet T. Conformational aspects of proteins at the air/water interface studied by infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy. Langmuir. 2003;19:2922–8.
Mitropoulos V, Mütze A, Fischer P. Mechanical properties of protein adsorption layers at the air/water and oil/water interface: a comparison in light of the thermodynamical stability of proteins. Adv Colloid Interf Sci. 2014;206:195–206.
Rabe M, Kerth A, Blume A, Garidel P. Albumin displacement on the air/water interface by tween (polysorbate) surfactants. Eur Biophysics J. 2020 (in press).
Bodratti AM, Alexandridis P. Formulation of poloxamers for drug delivery. J Funct Biomater. 2018;2018(9):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010011.
Lu Y, Zhang E, Yang J, Cao Z. Strategies to improve micelle stability for drug delivery. Nano Res. 2018;11(10):4985–98.
Waters LJ, Smith OEP, Small W, Mellor S. Understanding polysorbate-compound interactions within the CMC region. J Chromatogr A. 2020;1623(2020):461212.
Hait S, Moulik SP. Determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of nonionic surfactants by donor-acceptor interaction with iodine and correlation of CMC with hydrophile-lipophile balance and other parameters of the surfactants. J Surfactant Deterg. 2001;4:303–9.
Horiuchi S, Winter G. CMC determination of nonionic surfactants in protein formulations using ultrasonic resonance technology. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;92:8–14.
Mittal KL. Determination of CMC of polysorbate 20 in aqueous solution by surface tension method. J Pharm Sci. 1970;61(8):1334–5.
Nayem J, Zhang Z, Tomlinson A, Zarraga IE, Wagner NJ, Liu Y. Micellar morphology of polysorbate 20 and 80 and their ester fractions in solution via small-angle neutron scattering. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:01498–508.
Ortiz-Tafoya MC, Tecante A. Physicochemical characterization of sodium stearoyllactylate (SSL), polyoxyethylenesorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20) and κ-carrageenan. Data Brief. 2018;19:642–50.
Szymczyk K, Zdziennicka A, Jańczuk B. Adsorption and aggregation properties of some polysorbates at different temperatures. J Solut Chem. 2018;47:1824–40.
Wan LSC, Lee PFS. CMC of polysorbates. J Pharm Sci. 1974;61(8):136–7.
Braun AC, Ilko D, Merget B, Gieseler H, Germershaus O, Holzgrabe U, et al. Predicting critical micelle concentration and micelle molecular weight of polysorbate 80 using compendial methods. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;94:559–68.
Brezesinski G, Mögel HJ. Grenzflächen und Kolloide. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg: Physikalisch-chemisch Grundlagen; 1993.
Dörfler HD. Grenzflächen- und Kolloidchemie. VCH-Verlag: Weinheim; 1994.
Schwuger MJ. Lehrbuch der Grenzflächenchemie. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 1996.
Lauth J, Kowalczyl J. Einführung in die Physik und Chemie der Grenzflächen und Kolloide. Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum; 2016.
DIN EN 14370: 2004–11 Grenzflächenaktive Stoffe - Bestimmung der Oberflächenspannung.
DIN 53914: 1997–07 Prüfung von Tensiden - Bestimmung der Oberflächenspannung.
Hoffmann C. Protein-Detergenz-Wechselwirkungen. Germany: Masterarbeit Martin-Luther-Universität Halle/Saale; 2007.
Den Engelsman J, Kebbel F, Garidel P. Laser light scattering-based techniques used for the characterisation of protein therapeutics. In: Mahler HC, Jiskoot W, editors. Analysis of aggregates and particles in protein pharmaceuticals, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Chapter, vol. 3. 1st ed; 2012. p. 37–60.
Karow AR, Götzl J, Garidel P. Resolving power of dynamic light scattering for protein and polystyrene nanoparticles. Pharm Dev Technol. 2015;20(1):84–9.
Pallas NR, Harrison Y. An automated drop shape apparatus and the surface tension of pure water. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 1990;43:169–94.
Martos A, Koch W, Jiskoot W, Wuchner K, Winter G, Friess W, et al. Trends on analytical characterization of polysorbates and their degradation products in biopharmaceutical formulations. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:1722–35.
Hildebrand A, Garidel P, Neubert R, Blume A. Thermodynamics of demicellization of mixed micelles composed of sodium oleate and bile salts. Langmuir. 2004;20:320–8.
Tsamaloukas AD, Beck A, Heerklotz H. Modeling the micellization behavior of mixed and pure n-alkyl-maltosides. Langmuir. 2009;25:4393–401.
Paula S, Sues W, Tuchtenhagen J, Blume A. Thermodynamics of micelle formation as a function of temperature: a high sensitivity titration calorimetry study. J Phys Chem. 1995;99:11742–51.
Basheva ES, Kralchevsky PA, Danov KD, Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Lips A. The colloid structural forces as a tool for particle characterization and control of dispersion stability. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2007;9:5183–98.
Rehman N, Ullah H, Alam S, Khaliq Jan A, Wali Khan S, Tariq M. Surface and thermodynamic study of micellization of non ionic surfactant/diblock copolymer system as revealed by surface tension and conductivity. JMES. 2017;8(4):1161–7.
Niño M, Patino JMR. Surface tension of bovine serum albumin and tween 20 at the air-aqueous interface. J Amer Oil Chem Soc. 1998;75(10):1241–8.
Garidel P, Presser I. Lyophilisation of high-concentration protein formulations. In: Ward KR, Matejtschuk P, editors. Lyophilisation of pharmaceuticals and biologicals: new technologies and approaches, Methods in pharmacology and toxicology, Springer, chapter, vol. 12; 2019. p. 291–325.
Stetefeld J, McKenna SA, Pate TR. Dynamic light scattering: a practical guide and applications in biomedical sciences. Biophys Rev. 2016;8:409–27.
Mandal AB, Gupta S, Moulik SP. Charcaterisation of Tween 20 and Tween 80 micelles in aqueous medium from transport studies. Indian J Chem. 1985;24A:670–3.
Chen H, Panagiotopoulos AZ. Molecular modelling of surfactant micellization using solvent-accessible surface area. Langmuir. 2019;25:2443–50.
Robson RJ, Dennis EA. The size, shape, and hydration of nonionic surfactant micelles. Triton X-100. J Phys Chem. 1977;81(11):1075–8.
Le Maire M, Champeil P, Møller JV. Interaction of membrane proteins and lipids with solubilizing detergents. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1508:86–111.
Bhattacharya SC, Das H, und Moulik SP. Effect of Solvent and Micellar Enviroment on Spectroscopic Behavior of the Dye Safranine T. J. Photoch. Photobio. A. 1994;79:109–114.
Penfold J, Thomas RK, Li PX, Petkov JT, Tucker I, Webster JRP, et al. Adsorption at air–water and oil–water interfaces and self-assembly in aqueous solution of ethoxylated polysorbate nonionic surfactants. Langmuir. 2015;31:3003–11.
Kebbel F. Charakterisierung kolloidaler und thermischer Stabilitäten von Antikörpern mittels dynamischer Lichtstreuung. Universität Ulm: Diplomarbeit; 2009.
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Hoffmann and F. Kebbel for excellent technical assistance and J. Mittag for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and Animals
This article does not contain any studies with human and animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garidel, P., Blech, M., Buske, J. et al. Surface Tension and Self-association Properties of Aqueous Polysorbate 20 HP and 80 HP Solutions: Insights into Protein Stabilisation Mechanisms. J Pharm Innov 16, 726–734 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-020-09488-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-020-09488-4