Quantitative Simulation on Powder Shear Flow Using Discrete Element Method
- 60 Downloads
In the pharmaceutical industry, a deep understanding on the physical properties of drug substance (DS) and excipients, such as the powder flowability and compressibility, is critical for the quality control of solid dose drug product (DP). The purpose of this work is to develop a quantitative simulation method to model powder flow by applying the discrete element method (DEM) simulation on the ring shear testing process.
A commercially available software Star CCM+ v10.2 by Siemens (New York, NY, USA) was applied as the DEM simulation software. A workstation with Dual CPUs Intel® Xeon® E5-2640 @ 2.50 GHz (24 processors) was applied as the simulation hardware. The Hertz-Mindlin non-slip contact model was applied for particle-particle and particle-wall interactions. The Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) model was applied to model the cohesion between particles. Original data of powder flowability was measured using the Ring Shear Tester RST-XS by Jenike & Johanson, Inc. (Tyngsborough, MA, USA).
The sliding friction coefficient and the work of cohesion were determined as influential parameters on the flowability of DEM particles in the scope of this study. Correlation was established between DEM parameter setting and shear flow behavior of bulk DEM particles by applying multiple linear regression and was verified by comparing simulation with shear flow data of common pharmaceutical excipients.
This method is recommended for general formulation and manufacture development of solid dose DP.
KeywordsDiscrete element method Shear flow Particle technology
This work is supported by the Formulation Development group of Takeda-Boston. The author would like to thank Willow DiLuzio, Frederick Hicks, Hirohisa Takeuchi, Yoshinobu Sato, and Marianne Langston for their assistance, and Siemens PLM for providing the simulation software.
- 3.Luding S. Contact Models for very loose granular materials. In: Eberhard P, editor. IUTAM Symposium on Multiscale Problems in Multibody System Contacts: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium held in Stuttgart, Germany, February 20–23, 2006. Netherlands: Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.JenikeAW. Storage and flow of solids, bulletin no. 123. Bulletin of the University of Utah. 1964;53(26).Google Scholar
- 7.Schulze D. Shear testing of powders for process optimization. Ann Trans Nordic Rheology Soc. 2013;21:99–106.Google Scholar
- 8.Schulze D. Flow properties of powders and bulk solids. Braunschweig/Wolfenbu ttel: University of Applied Sciences; 2006.Google Scholar
- 15.AignerA, SchneiderbauerS, KlossC, PirkerS. Determining the coefficient of friction by shear tester simulation. 3rd International Conference on Particle-Based Methods; 2013; 2013. p. 335–42.Google Scholar
- 28.Mindlin R. Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. J Appl Mech. 1949;16Google Scholar
- 30.GrafK, Kappl M. Physics and chemistry of interfaces: John Wiley & Sons2006.Google Scholar
- 31.JohnsonKL, JohnsonKL. Contact mechanics: Cambridge university press 1987.Google Scholar
- 34.Derekshani S, Schott D, Lodewijks G. Reducing computation time of DEM simulations of fine granular materials. Bulk Solids Handling. 2013;6:52–6.Google Scholar